Department of Radiology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
J Radiat Res. 2011;52(5):592-9. doi: 10.1269/jrr.11005. Epub 2011 Jul 16.
The objective of our study was to describe the dose gradient characteristics of Linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery using Paddick's gradient index (GI) and to elucidate the factors influencing the GI value. Seventy-three plans for brain metastases using the dynamic conformal arcs were reviewed. The GI values were calculated at the 80% and 90% isodose surfaces (IDSs) and at the different target coverage IDSs (D99, D95, D90, and D85). The GI values significantly decreased as the target coverage of the reference IDS increased (the percentage of the IDS decreased). There was a significant inverse correlation between the GI values and target volume. The plans generated with the addition of a 1-mm leaf margin had worse GI values both at the D99 and D95 relative to those without leaf margin. The number and arrangement of arcs also affected the GI value. The GI values are highly sensitive to (1) the IDS selection variability for dose prescription or evaluation, (2) the target volume, and (3) the planning method. To objectively compare the quality of dose gradient between rival plans, it would be preferable to employ the GI defined at the reference IDS indicating the specific target coverage (e.g., D95), irrespective of the intended marginal dose. The modified GI (mGI), defined in this study, substituting the denominator of the original GI with the target volume, would be useful to compensate for the false superior GI value in cases of target over-coverage with the reference IDS and to objectively evaluate the dose gradient outside the target boundary.
我们的研究目的是描述使用 Paddick 梯度指数 (GI) 的直线加速器立体定向放射外科的剂量梯度特征,并阐明影响 GI 值的因素。回顾了 73 例使用动态适形弧治疗脑转移瘤的计划。在 80%和 90%等剂量面(IDS)以及不同靶区覆盖的 IDS(D99、D95、D90 和 D85)上计算 GI 值。随着靶区覆盖参考 IDS 的增加(IDS 的百分比降低),GI 值显著降低。GI 值与靶区体积呈显著负相关。与没有叶边的计划相比,增加 1mm 叶边的计划在 D99 和 D95 处的 GI 值更差。叶片数量和排列也会影响 GI 值。GI 值对(1)剂量处方或评估的 IDS 选择变化性、(2)靶区体积和(3)规划方法非常敏感。为了客观比较竞争计划之间的剂量梯度质量,最好使用在参考 IDS 上定义的 GI,该 GI 表示特定的靶区覆盖(例如,D95),而不考虑预期的边缘剂量。本研究中定义的修正 GI(mGI),用目标体积代替原始 GI 的分母,将有助于补偿参考 IDS 下靶区过度覆盖时的虚假高 GI 值,并客观评估靶区边界外的剂量梯度。