• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物能源原料选择、景观动态与土地利用之间的相互作用。

Interactions among bioenergy feedstock choices, landscape dynamics, and land use.

机构信息

Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830, USA.

出版信息

Ecol Appl. 2011 Jun;21(4):1039-54. doi: 10.1890/09-0501.1.

DOI:10.1890/09-0501.1
PMID:21774412
Abstract

Landscape implications of bioenergy feedstock choices are significant and depend on land-use practices and their environmental impacts. Although land-use changes and carbon emissions associated with bioenergy feedstock production are dynamic and complicated, lignocellulosic feedstocks may offer opportunities that enhance sustainability when compared to other transportation fuel alternatives. For bioenergy sustainability, major drivers and concerns revolve around energy security, food production, land productivity, soil carbon and erosion, greenhouse gas emissions, biodiversity, air quality, and water quantity and quality. The many implications of bioenergy feedstock choices require several indicators at multiple scales to provide a more complete accounting of effects. Ultimately, the long-term sustainability of bioenergy feedstock resources (as well as food supplies) throughout the world depends on land-use practices and landscape dynamics. Land-management decisions often invoke trade-offs among potential environmental effects and social and economic factors as well as future opportunities for resource use. The hypothesis being addressed in this paper is that sustainability of bioenergy feedstock production can be achieved via appropriately designed crop residue and perennial lignocellulosic systems. We find that decision makers need scientific advancements and adequate data that both provide quantitative and qualitative measures of the effects of bioenergy feedstock choices at different spatial and temporal scales and allow fair comparisons among available options for renewable liquid fuels.

摘要

生物能源原料选择对景观的影响是巨大的,这取决于土地利用方式及其环境影响。尽管生物能源原料生产相关的土地利用变化和碳排放是动态且复杂的,但与其他交通燃料替代品相比,木质纤维素原料可能会提供增强可持续性的机会。对于生物能源的可持续性,主要的驱动因素和关注点包括能源安全、粮食生产、土地生产力、土壤碳和侵蚀、温室气体排放、生物多样性、空气质量以及水的数量和质量。生物能源原料选择的诸多影响需要在多个尺度上使用多个指标,以更全面地说明其影响。最终,全球生物能源原料资源(包括粮食供应)的长期可持续性取决于土地利用方式和景观动态。土地管理决策通常会在潜在环境影响以及社会和经济因素之间进行权衡,同时也会考虑未来资源利用的机会。本文所探讨的假设是,通过合理设计的作物残茬和多年生木质纤维素系统,可以实现生物能源原料生产的可持续性。我们发现,决策者需要科学的进步和充分的数据,这些数据既可以提供不同时空尺度上生物能源原料选择影响的定量和定性衡量标准,也可以在可再生液体燃料的现有选择之间进行公平比较。

相似文献

1
Interactions among bioenergy feedstock choices, landscape dynamics, and land use.生物能源原料选择、景观动态与土地利用之间的相互作用。
Ecol Appl. 2011 Jun;21(4):1039-54. doi: 10.1890/09-0501.1.
2
Recent Land Use Change to Agriculture in the U.S. Lake States: Impacts on Cellulosic Biomass Potential and Natural Lands.美国湖泊地区近期农业土地利用变化:对纤维素生物质潜力和自然土地的影响。
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 11;11(2):e0148566. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148566. eCollection 2016.
3
Biofuels, land, and water: a systems approach to sustainability.生物燃料、土地与水:可持续性的系统方法
Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Aug 1;43(15):6094-100. doi: 10.1021/es900801u.
4
Landscape patterns of bioenergy in a changing climate: implications for crop allocation and land-use competition.气候变化下生物能源的景观格局:对作物分配和土地利用竞争的影响。
Ecol Appl. 2016 Mar;26(2):515-29. doi: 10.1890/15-0545.
5
The potential impacts of biomass feedstock production on water resource availability.生物质原料生产对水资源可获得性的潜在影响。
Bioresour Technol. 2010 Mar;101(6):2014-25. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.10.037. Epub 2009 Nov 24.
6
Assessing Regional-Scale Impacts of Short Rotation Coppices on Ecosystem Services by Modeling Land-Use Decisions.通过模拟土地利用决策评估短轮伐期矮林对生态系统服务的区域尺度影响。
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 15;11(4):e0153862. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153862. eCollection 2016.
7
Biogeochemical Research Priorities for Sustainable Biofuel and Bioenergy Feedstock Production in the Americas.美洲可持续生物燃料和生物能源原料生产的生物地球化学研究重点
Environ Manage. 2015 Dec;56(6):1330-55. doi: 10.1007/s00267-015-0536-7. Epub 2015 May 26.
8
Alternative scenarios of bioenergy crop production in an agricultural landscape and implications for bird communities.农业景观中生物能源作物生产的替代方案及其对鸟类群落的影响。
Ecol Appl. 2016 Jan;26(1):42-54. doi: 10.1890/14-1490.
9
Aquatic weeds as the next generation feedstock for sustainable bioenergy production.水生杂草作为下一代可持续生物能源生产的原料。
Bioresour Technol. 2018 Mar;251:390-402. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.11.082. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
10
Biofuels on the landscape: is "land sharing" preferable to "land sparing"?生物燃料与景观:“土地共享”是否优于“土地节约”?
Ecol Appl. 2012 Dec;22(8):2035-48. doi: 10.1890/12-0711.1.

引用本文的文献

1
Lignin Nanoparticles: Transforming Environmental Remediation.木质素纳米颗粒:变革环境修复
Nanomaterials (Basel). 2024 Sep 23;14(18):1541. doi: 10.3390/nano14181541.
2
Hydrologic cost-effectiveness ratio favors switchgrass production on marginal croplands over existing grasslands.水文成本效益比表明,在边际农田种植柳枝稷比在现有草原种植更具优势。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 8;12(8):e0181924. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181924. eCollection 2017.
3
Bioenergy and Biodiversity: Key Lessons from the Pan American Region.生物能源与生物多样性:泛美地区的关键经验教训。
Environ Manage. 2015 Dec;56(6):1377-96. doi: 10.1007/s00267-015-0559-0. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
4
Communicating about bioenergy sustainability.生物能源可持续性沟通。
Environ Manage. 2013 Feb;51(2):279-90. doi: 10.1007/s00267-012-0014-4. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
5
Comparing scales of environmental effects from gasoline and ethanol production.比较汽油和乙醇生产的环境影响规模。
Environ Manage. 2013 Feb;51(2):307-38. doi: 10.1007/s00267-012-9983-6. Epub 2012 Dec 2.
6
Environmental indicators of biofuel sustainability: what about context?生物燃料可持续性的环境指标:语境如何?
Environ Manage. 2013 Feb;51(2):291-306. doi: 10.1007/s00267-012-9907-5. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
7
Biomass for energy in the European Union - a review of bioenergy resource assessments.欧盟的能源生物质——生物能源资源评估综述。
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2012 Apr 30;5(1):25. doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-5-25.