Suppr超能文献

血糖控制与血脂和血压降低及动脉粥样硬化的关系:SANDS 经验。

Relationship of glycemia control to lipid and blood pressure lowering and atherosclerosis: the SANDS experience.

机构信息

MedStar Health Research Institute, Hyattsville, MD 20782, USA.

出版信息

J Diabetes Complications. 2011 Nov-Dec;25(6):362-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2011.04.001. Epub 2011 Jul 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Cardiovascular disease prevention for patients with type 2 diabetes is accomplished through hypertension and dyslipidemia management. Although studies have established strategies for lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and blood pressure (BP), none have examined whether glycemia influences ability to achieve lipid and BP targets. This post hoc analysis from the Stop Atherosclerosis in Native Diabetics Study examines the role of baseline glycemia in achieving standard and aggressive targets and outcomes after 36 months.

METHODS

Diabetic individuals aged > 40 years with no cardiovascular events (n = 499) were randomized to aggressive versus standard targets for LDL-C, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) and systolic BP (SBP). Management algorithms were used for both groups. Carotid ultrasound and echocardiography were performed at baseline and after 36 months.

RESULTS

No differences were observed in baseline hemoglobin A1c between treatment groups nor any significant change in A1c after 36 months in either group. Baseline A1c, however, was significantly and negatively related to achieving LDL-C (P = .007), non-HDL-C (P = .03) and SBP targets (P = .007) and to changes in LDL-C (P = .007), non-HDL-C (P = .03) and SBP (P = .001) in both groups. Baseline A1c failed to predict progression of carotid intima medial thickness (CIMT) (P = .42) or left ventricular mass index (LVMI) (P = .10), nor was it related to the effects of lipid and BP lowering on CIMT and LVMI over 36 months.

CONCLUSIONS

In diabetic adults with no cardiovascular disease events, A1c was negatively associated with ability to achieve LDL-C, non-HDL-C and SBP goals but was not independently related to treatment-associated changes in CIMT or LVMI over 36 months.

摘要

目的

通过高血压和血脂异常管理来预防 2 型糖尿病患者的心血管疾病。虽然研究已经确定了降低低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)和血压(BP)的策略,但没有研究检查血糖是否会影响达到血脂和 BP 目标的能力。来自 Native Diabetics Study 的这项事后分析检查了基线血糖在达到标准和强化目标以及 36 个月后结果中的作用。

方法

将无心血管事件的年龄>40 岁的糖尿病个体(n=499)随机分为 LDL-C、非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(non-HDL-C)和收缩压(SBP)的强化目标与标准目标两组。两组均使用管理算法。在基线和 36 个月后进行颈动脉超声和超声心动图检查。

结果

两组之间在治疗开始时的血红蛋白 A1c 没有差异,也没有任何组在 36 个月后 A1c 有明显变化。然而,基线 A1c 与 LDL-C(P=0.007)、非-HDL-C(P=0.03)和 SBP 目标(P=0.007)的达标显著负相关,与 LDL-C(P=0.007)、非-HDL-C(P=0.03)和 SBP(P=0.001)在两组中的变化也显著负相关。基线 A1c 未能预测颈动脉内膜中层厚度(CIMT)的进展(P=0.42)或左心室质量指数(LVMI)(P=0.10),也与 36 个月内降脂和降压对 CIMT 和 LVMI 的影响无关。

结论

在无心血管疾病事件的糖尿病成人中,A1c 与 LDL-C、非-HDL-C 和 SBP 目标的达标能力呈负相关,但与 36 个月内 CIMT 或 LVMI 的治疗相关变化无关。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

8
Standards of medical care in diabetes--2009.《糖尿病医疗护理标准——2009》
Diabetes Care. 2009 Jan;32 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S13-61. doi: 10.2337/dc09-S013.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验