Suppr超能文献

全员教学、全员学习、全员提升?:组织间学习在质量改进合作中的作用。

All teach, all learn, all improve?: the role of interorganizational learning in quality improvement collaboratives.

机构信息

School of Public Health, School of Management, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

出版信息

Health Care Manage Rev. 2012 Apr-Jun;37(2):154-64. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e31822af831.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Quality improvement collaboratives are an increasingly common strategy for implementing evidence-based practices in health care. However, research shows that many participating organizations do not achieve the level of performance improvement desired.

PURPOSE

This study examined the use of interorganizational learning activities (inter-OLAs) as an explanation for mixed performance improvement among collaborative participants. We tested the hypotheses that inter-OLA use is positively associated with participants' performance improvement and that this relationship is moderated by the use of intraorganizational learning activities (intra-OLAs) and quality-focused human resource (Q-HR) practices.

METHODOLOGY

We conducted a survey of organizational teams participating in 4 Institute for Healthcare Improvement Breakthrough Series collaboratives. Survey responses from 52 teams, regarding the use of inter-OLAs, intra-OLAs and Q-HR practices, were linked to performance improvement data obtained from the Institute for Healthcare Improvement and demographic data obtained from secondary sources.

FINDINGS

The more collaborative teams used inter-OLAs, the more their organizations' performance improved. Contrary to our hypothesis, the use of intra-OLAs did not moderate this relationship; teams' use of intra-OLAs added to, but did not multiply, the effect of inter-OLA use. In contrast, an organization's use of Q-HR practices multiplied the performance benefit of inter-OLA use.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Our findings suggest that organizations that participate in collaboratives are more likely to improve their performance if they use the inter-OLAs offered by the collaborative. Our results also suggest that complementing high use of inter-OLAs with intra-OLA use and Q-HR practices enhances performance improvement. For collaborative sponsors, our findings imply that including activities that facilitate interorganizational and intraorganizational learning are worthwhile.

摘要

背景

质量改进合作是在医疗保健中实施循证实践的一种越来越常见的策略。然而,研究表明,许多参与组织并未达到预期的绩效提升水平。

目的

本研究考察了组织间学习活动(inter-OLAs)的使用情况,以解释合作参与者之间绩效提升效果的差异。我们检验了以下假设:inter-OLA 的使用与参与者的绩效提升呈正相关,并且这种关系受到组织内学习活动(intra-OLA)和以质量为导向的人力资源(Q-HR)实践的调节。

方法

我们对参与了四项“改善医疗保健国际协会突破性系列合作”的组织团队进行了一项调查。从机构获得了与绩效改进相关的数据,并从二级来源获得了团队关于使用 inter-OLA、intra-OLA 和 Q-HR 实践的调查响应。

结果

合作团队使用 inter-OLA 的程度越高,其组织的绩效提升幅度越大。与我们的假设相反,intra-OLA 的使用并没有调节这种关系;团队对 intra-OLA 的使用增加了 inter-OLA 使用的效果,但并没有使其倍增。相比之下,组织使用 Q-HR 实践会使 inter-OLA 使用的绩效收益倍增。

实践意义

我们的研究结果表明,如果组织参与合作,使用合作提供的 inter-OLA,则更有可能提高其绩效。我们的结果还表明,将 intra-OLA 使用和 Q-HR 实践与高 inter-OLA 使用相结合,可增强绩效提升效果。对于合作赞助商而言,我们的研究结果意味着包括促进组织间和组织内学习的活动是值得的。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Leadership Collaboratives: Navigating the Paradigm Shift.领导力协作:应对范式转变
Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2025 Jan 17;29(1):96-99. doi: 10.1188/25.CJON.96-99.

本文引用的文献

3
Learning networks for sustainable, large-scale improvement.用于可持续大规模改进的学习网络。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009 May;35(5):286-91. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(09)35041-2.
5
Evidence for the impact of quality improvement collaboratives: systematic review.质量改进协作影响的证据:系统评价
BMJ. 2008 Jun 28;336(7659):1491-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39570.749884.BE. Epub 2008 Jun 24.
6
Effects of quality improvement collaboratives.质量改进协作组织的效果
BMJ. 2008 Jun 28;336(7659):1448-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a216. Epub 2008 Jun 24.
8
How do teams in quality improvement collaboratives interact?质量改进协作组中的团队是如何互动的?
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2007 May;33(5):267-76. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(07)33031-6.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验