• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Repeatability of SUV measurements in serial PET.PET 中 SUV 测量的重复性。
Med Phys. 2011 May;38(5):2629-38. doi: 10.1118/1.3578604.
2
CT-based attenuation correction in the calculation of semi-quantitative indices of [18F]FDG uptake in PET.PET中[18F]FDG摄取半定量指标计算中的基于CT的衰减校正。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003 Mar;30(3):344-53. doi: 10.1007/s00259-002-1070-4. Epub 2002 Dec 20.
3
Influence of Statistical Fluctuation on Reproducibility and Accuracy of SUVmax and SUVpeak: A Phantom Study.统计波动对SUVmax和SUVpeak的可重复性及准确性的影响:一项模体研究
J Nucl Med Technol. 2015 Sep;43(3):222-6. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.115.161745. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
4
Noise considerations for PET quantification using maximum and peak standardized uptake value.使用最大标准化摄取值和峰值标准化摄取值进行 PET 定量的噪声考虑因素。
J Nucl Med. 2012 Jul;53(7):1041-7. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.101733. Epub 2012 May 24.
5
Instrumentation factors affecting variance and bias of quantifying tracer uptake with PET/CT.影响 PET/CT 定量示踪剂摄取的方差和偏差的仪器因素。
Med Phys. 2010 Nov;37(11):6035-46. doi: 10.1118/1.3499298.
6
Clinical implications of different image reconstruction parameters for interpretation of whole-body PET studies in cancer patients.不同图像重建参数对癌症患者全身PET研究解读的临床意义。
J Nucl Med. 2004 Apr;45(4):559-66.
7
Phantom validation of coregistration of PET and CT for image-guided radiotherapy.用于图像引导放射治疗的PET与CT配准的体模验证
Med Phys. 2004 May;31(5):1083-92. doi: 10.1118/1.1688041.
8
Repeatability of quantitative FDG-PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT in recurrent ovarian carcinoma: test-retest measurements for tumor FDG uptake, diameter, and volume.定量FDG-PET/CT与增强CT在复发性卵巢癌中的重复性:肿瘤FDG摄取、直径及体积的重测分析
Clin Cancer Res. 2014 May 15;20(10):2751-60. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-2634. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
9
Motion effects on SUV and lesion volume in 3D and 4D PET scanning.3D和4D PET扫描中运动对SUV及病变体积的影响。
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2011 Dec;34(4):489-95. doi: 10.1007/s13246-011-0109-x. Epub 2011 Nov 12.
10
Application of intravenous contrast in PET/CT: does it really introduce significant attenuation correction error?静脉造影剂在PET/CT中的应用:它真的会引入显著的衰减校正误差吗?
J Nucl Med. 2005 Feb;46(2):283-91.

引用本文的文献

1
Whole-body PET image denoising for reduced acquisition time.用于减少采集时间的全身PET图像去噪
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 30;11:1415058. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1415058. eCollection 2024.
2
Optimisation of scan duration and image quality in oncological Zr immunoPET imaging using the Biograph Vision PET/CT.使用 Biograph Vision PET/CT 优化肿瘤 Zr 免疫 PET 成像中的扫描时间和图像质量。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023 Jul;50(8):2258-2270. doi: 10.1007/s00259-023-06194-4. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
3
Analyzing spatial distribution between F-fluorodeoxyglucose and F-boronophenylalanine positron emission tomography to investigate selection indicators for boron neutron capture therapy.分析氟脱氧葡萄糖与氟硼苯丙氨酸正电子发射断层扫描之间的空间分布,以研究硼中子俘获治疗的选择指标。
EJNMMI Phys. 2022 Dec 19;9(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s40658-022-00514-7.
4
The Utility of PET/CT Metabolic Parameters Measured Based on Fixed Percentage Threshold of SUVmax and Adaptive Iterative Algorithm in the New Revised FIGO Staging System for Stage III Cervical Cancer.基于SUVmax固定百分比阈值和自适应迭代算法测量的PET/CT代谢参数在新修订的FIGO III期宫颈癌分期系统中的应用
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jul 29;8:680072. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.680072. eCollection 2021.
5
Population-based input function for TSPO quantification and kinetic modeling with [C]-DPA-713.用于使用[C]-DPA-713进行TSPO定量和动力学建模的基于人群的输入函数。
EJNMMI Phys. 2021 Apr 29;8(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s40658-021-00381-8.
6
Patterns-of-failure guided biological target volume definition for head and neck cancer patients: FDG-PET and dosimetric analysis of dose escalation candidate subregions.失败模式引导的头颈部癌患者生物靶区定义:FDG-PET及剂量递增候选子区域的剂量学分析
Radiother Oncol. 2017 Aug;124(2):248-255. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.07.017. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
7
Repeatability of SUV in Oncologic F-FDG PET.肿瘤学 F-FDG PET 中 SUV 的可重复性
J Nucl Med. 2017 Apr;58(4):523-532. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.186353. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
8
Longitudinal monitoring of reconstructed activity concentration on a clinical time-of-flight PET/CT scanner.在临床飞行时间PET/CT扫描仪上对重建后的活度浓度进行纵向监测。
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2017 Jan;4(1):011004. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.4.1.011004. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
9
Prospective, longitudinal, multi-modal functional imaging for radical chemo-IMRT treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer: the INSIGHT study.局部晚期头颈癌根治性化疗调强放疗的前瞻性、纵向、多模态功能成像:INSIGHT研究
Radiat Oncol. 2015 May 15;10:112. doi: 10.1186/s13014-015-0415-7.
10
PET quantification with a histogram derived total activity metric: superior quantitative consistency compared to total lesion glycolysis with absolute or relative SUV thresholds in phantoms and lung cancer patients.基于直方图导出的总活度指标的PET定量分析:与使用绝对或相对SUV阈值的总病变糖酵解相比,在体模和肺癌患者中具有更高的定量一致性。
Nucl Med Biol. 2014 May-Jun;41(5):410-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2014.02.006. Epub 2014 Feb 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Instrumentation factors affecting variance and bias of quantifying tracer uptake with PET/CT.影响 PET/CT 定量示踪剂摄取的方差和偏差的仪器因素。
Med Phys. 2010 Nov;37(11):6035-46. doi: 10.1118/1.3499298.
2
Variability in PET quantitation within a multicenter consortium.多中心协作组内 PET 定量的可变性。
Med Phys. 2010 Jul;37(7):3660-6. doi: 10.1118/1.3455705.
3
PET/CT Assessment of Response to Therapy: Tumor Change Measurement, Truth Data, and Error.正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)评估治疗反应:肿瘤变化测量、真实数据和误差。
Transl Oncol. 2009 Dec;2(4):223-30. doi: 10.1593/tlo.09223.
4
Quantitative imaging for evaluation of response to cancer therapy.用于评估癌症治疗反应的定量成像。
Transl Oncol. 2009 Dec;2(4):195-7. doi: 10.1593/tlo.09217.
5
Repeatability of 18F-FDG PET in a multicenter phase I study of patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies.18F-FDG PET在晚期胃肠道恶性肿瘤患者多中心I期研究中的重复性
J Nucl Med. 2009 Oct;50(10):1646-54. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.063347. Epub 2009 Sep 16.
6
From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors.从RECIST到PERCIST:实体瘤中PET反应标准的不断演变的考量
J Nucl Med. 2009 May;50 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):122S-50S. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.057307.
7
Reproducibility of standardized uptake value measurements determined by 18F-FDG PET in malignant tumors.18F-FDG PET测定恶性肿瘤标准化摄取值的可重复性
J Nucl Med. 2008 Nov;49(11):1804-8. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.054239. Epub 2008 Oct 16.
8
Partial-volume effect in PET tumor imaging.PET肿瘤成像中的部分容积效应。
J Nucl Med. 2007 Jun;48(6):932-45. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.106.035774. Epub 2007 May 15.
9
Time course of early response to chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients with 18F-FDG PET/CT.非小细胞肺癌患者接受18F-FDG PET/CT检查后对化疗早期反应的时间进程
J Nucl Med. 2007 May;48(5):744-51. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.106.038513.
10
18F-FDG PET is an early predictor of pathologic tumor response to preoperative radiochemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.18F-FDG PET是局部晚期直肠癌术前放化疗后肿瘤病理反应的早期预测指标。
J Nucl Med. 2006 Aug;47(8):1241-8.

PET 中 SUV 测量的重复性。

Repeatability of SUV measurements in serial PET.

机构信息

Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10021, USA.

出版信息

Med Phys. 2011 May;38(5):2629-38. doi: 10.1118/1.3578604.

DOI:10.1118/1.3578604
PMID:21776800
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7986573/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The standardized uptake value (SUV) is a quantitative measure of FDG tumor uptake frequently used as a tool to monitor therapeutic response. This study aims to (i) assess the reproducibility and uncertainty of SUV max and SUV mean, due to purely statistical, i.e., nonbiological, effects and (ii) to establish the minimum uncertainty below which changes in SUV cannot be expected to be an indicator of physiological changes.

METHODS

Three sets of measurements were made using a GE Discovery STE PET/CT Scanner in 3D mode: (1) A uniform 68Ge 20 cm diameter cylindrical phantom was imaged. Thirty serial frames were acquired for durations of 3, 6, 10, 15, and 30 min. (2) Esser flangeless phantom (Data Spectrum, approximately 6.1 L) with fillable thin-walled cylinders inserts (diameters: 8, 12, 16, and 25 mm; height: approximately 3.8 mm) was scanned for five consecutive 3 min runs. The cylinders were filled with 18FDG with a 37 kBq/cc concentration, and with a target-to-background ratio (T/BKG) of 3/1. (3) Eight cancer patients with healthy livers were scanned approximately 1.5 h post injection. Three sequential 3 min scans were performed for one bed position covering the liver, with the patient and bed remaining at the same position for the entire length of the scan. Volumes of interest were drawn on all images using the corresponding CT and then transferred to the PET images. For each study (1-3), the average percent change in SUV mean and SUV max were determined for each run pair. Moreover, the repeatability coefficient was calculated for both the SUV mean and SUV max for each pair of runs. Finally, the overall ROI repeatability coefficient was determined for each pair of runs.

RESULTS

For the 68Ge phantom the average percent change in SUV max and SUV mean decrease as a function of increasing acquisition time from 4.7 +/- 3.1 to 1.1 +/- 0.6%, and from 0.14 +/- 0.09 to 0.04 +/- 0.03%, respectively. Similarly, the coefficients of repeatability also decrease between the 3 and 30 min acquisition scans, in the range of 10.9 +/- 3.9% - 2.6 +/- 0.9%, and 0.3 +/- 0.1% - 0.10 +/- 0.04%, for the SUV max and SUV mean, respectively. The overall ROI repeatability decreased from 18.9 +/- 0.2 to 6.0 +/- 0.1% between the 3 and 30 min acquisition scans. For the l8FDG phantom, the average percent change in SUV max and SUV mean decreases with target diameter from 3.6 +/- 2.0 to 1.5 +/- 0.8% and 1.5 +/- 1.3 to 0.26 +/- 0.15%, respectively, for targets from 8-25 mm in diameter and for a region in the background (BKG). The coefficients of repeatability for SUV max and SUV mean also decrease as a function of target diameter from 7.1 +/- 2.5 to 2.4 +/- 0.9 and 4.2 +/- 1.5 to 0.6 +/- 0.2, respectively, for targets from 8 mm to BKG in diameter. Finally, overall ROI repeatability decreased from 12.0 +/- 4.1 to 13.4 +/- 0.5 targets from 8 mm to BKG in diameter. Finally, for the measurements in healthy livers the average percent change in SUVmax and SUV mean were in the range of 0.5 +/- 0.2% - 6.2 +/- 3.9% and 0.4 +/- 0.1 and 1.6 +/- 1%, respectively. The coefficients of repeatability for SUV max and SUV men are in the range of 0.6 +/- 0.7% - 9.5 +/- 12% and 0.6 +/- 0.7% - 2.9 +/- 3.6%, respectively. The overall target repeatability varied between 27.9 +/- 0.5% and 41.1 +/- 1.0%.

CONCLUSIONS

The statistical fluctuations of the SUV mean are half as large as those of the SUV max in the absence of biological or physiological effects. In addition, for clinically applicable scan durations (i.e., approximately 3 min) and FDG concentrations, the SUV max and SUV mean have similar amounts of statistical fluctuation for small regions. However, the statistical fluctuations of the SUVmean rapidly decrease with respect tothe SUVmax as the statistical power of the data grows either due to longer scanning times or as the target regions encompass a larger volume.

摘要

目的

标准化摄取值(SUV)是一种常用于监测治疗反应的 FDG 肿瘤摄取的定量测量方法。本研究旨在:(i)评估由于纯粹的统计,即非生物学效应引起的 SUVmax 和 SUVmean 的可重复性和不确定性;(ii)确定 SUV 变化不可能指示生理变化的最小不确定性。

方法

使用 GE Discovery STE PET/CT 扫描仪在 3D 模式下进行了三组测量:(1)均匀的 68Ge 20cm 直径圆柱状体模,采集 3、6、10、15 和 30min 的 30 个连续帧。(2)Esser 无边缘体模(Data Spectrum,约 6.1L),可填充薄壁圆柱插入物(直径:8、12、16 和 25mm;高度:约 3.8mm),连续进行五次 3min 扫描。圆柱体用 18FDG 填充,浓度为 37kBq/cc,目标与背景的比值(T/BKG)为 3/1。(3)八名健康肝脏的癌症患者,注射后约 1.5 小时进行扫描。对一个肝区的三个连续 3min 扫描进行了 3 次扫描,患者和床在整个扫描过程中保持在同一位置。使用相应的 CT 在所有图像上绘制感兴趣区域(ROI),然后将其转移到 PET 图像上。对于每个研究(1-3),确定了每个运行对的 SUVmean 和 SUVmax 的平均百分比变化。此外,还计算了每个运行对的 SUVmean 和 SUVmax 的重复性系数。最后,确定了每个运行对的整体 ROI 重复性系数。

结果

对于 68Ge 体模,SUVmax 和 SUVmean 的平均百分比变化随着采集时间的增加而降低,从 4.7%±3.1%降低至 1.1%±0.6%,从 0.14%±0.09%降低至 0.04%±0.03%。同样,在 3 和 30min 采集扫描之间,SUVmax 和 SUVmean 的重复性系数也分别在 10.9%±3.9%-2.6%±0.9%和 0.3%±0.1%-0.10%±0.04%的范围内降低。在 3 和 30min 采集扫描之间,整体 ROI 重复性从 18.9%±0.2%降低至 6.0%±0.1%。对于 18FDG 体模,SUVmax 和 SUVmean 的平均百分比变化随着目标直径的减小而降低,从 8-25mm 直径的目标的 3.6%±2.0%降低至 1.5%±0.8%,从 1.5%±1.3%降低至 0.26%±0.15%,对于背景(BKG)区域。SUVmax 和 SUVmean 的重复性系数也随着目标直径的减小而降低,从 8mm 目标的 7.1%±2.5%降低至 2.4%±0.9%和 4.2%±1.5%降低至 0.6%±0.2%,对于 BKG 区域。最后,整体 ROI 重复性从 12.0%±4.1%降低至 13.4%±0.5%,从 8mm 目标到 BKG 区域。最后,在健康肝脏的测量中,SUVmax 和 SUVmean 的平均百分比变化在 0.5%±0.2%-6.2%±3.9%和 0.4%±0.1%和 1.6%±1%的范围内。SUVmax 和 SUVmean 的重复性系数在 0.6%±0.7%-9.5%±12%和 0.6%±0.7%-2.9%±3.6%的范围内。整体目标重复性在 27.9%±0.5%和 41.1%±1.0%之间变化。

结论

在不存在生物学或生理学效应的情况下,SUVmean 的统计波动是 SUVmax 的一半。此外,对于临床可应用的扫描时间(即大约 3min)和 FDG 浓度,对于小区域,SUVmax 和 SUVmean 具有相似数量的统计波动。然而,随着数据统计能力的提高,即由于扫描时间的延长或目标区域的体积增大,SUVmean 的统计波动相对于 SUVmax 迅速减小。