Araraquara School of Dentistry, UNESP-Univ Estadual Paulista, Pediatric Dentistry, São Paulo, Brazil.
Oper Dent. 2011 Mar-Apr;36(2):133-42. doi: 10.2341/10-006-L.
This in vitro study evaluated the performance of visual (International Caries Detection and Assessment System [ICDAS]) and radiographic (bitewing [BW]) examinations for occlusal caries detection and their associations with treatment decision (TD). Permanent teeth (n=104) with occlusal surfaces varying from sound to cavitated were selected. Sites were identified from 10× occlusal surface photographs. Standardized bitewing (BW) radiographs were taken. Four dentists with at least five years of experience scored all teeth twice (one-week interval) for ICDAS (0–6), BW (0=sound, 1=caries restricted to enamel, 2=caries in outer third dentin, 3=caries in inner third dentin), and TD (0=no treatment, 1=sealant, 2=microabrasion and sealant, 3=round bur sealant, 4a=resin, 4b=amalgam). Histological validation was performed by observation under a light microscope, with lesions classified on a five-point scale. Intraexaminer and interexaminer repeatability were assessed using two-way tables and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Comparisons between percentage correct, specificity, sensitivity, and area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve were performed using bootstrap analyses. ICCs for intraexaminer and interexaminer repeatability indicated good repeatability for each examiner, ranging from 0.78 to 0.88, and among examiners, ranging from 0.74 to 0.81. Correlation between ICDAS and TD was 0.85 and between BW and TD was 0.78. Correlation between the methods and histological scores was moderate (0.63 for ICDAS and 0.61 for BW). The area under the ROC curve was significantly greater for ICDAS than for BW (p<0.0001). ICDAS had significantly lower specificity than BW did (p=0.0269, 79% vs 94%); however, sensitivity was much higher for ICDAS than for BW (p<0.0001, 83% vs 44%). Data from this investigation suggested that the visual examination (ICDAS) showed better performance than radiographic examination for occlusal caries detection. The ICDAS was strongly associated with TD. Although the correlation between the ICDAS and BW was lower, it is still valuable in the clinical decision-making process.
本体外研究评估了视觉(国际龋病检测和评估系统[ICDAS])和影像学(咬合片[BW])检查在窝沟龋检测中的性能及其与治疗决策(TD)的关系。选择了从正常到龋坏的磨牙咬合面。从 10×咬合面照片中识别出病变部位。拍摄标准化的咬合片(BW)射线照片。四位具有至少五年经验的牙医在一周的间隔内两次对所有牙齿进行 ICDAS(0-6)、BW(0=正常,1=龋局限于釉质,2=龋在外三分之一牙本质,3=龋在内三分之一牙本质)和 TD(0=无治疗,1=窝沟封闭,2=微研磨和窝沟封闭,3=圆钻窝沟封闭,4a=树脂,4b=银汞合金)评分。通过在光显微镜下观察进行组织学验证,病变分为五分制。使用双向表和组内相关系数(ICC)评估内部和外部检查者的重复性。使用 bootstrap 分析比较百分比正确、特异性、敏感性和接收器工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积。内部和外部检查者的 ICC 表明每位检查者的重复性都很好,范围在 0.78 到 0.88 之间,检查者之间的重复性范围在 0.74 到 0.81 之间。ICDAS 与 TD 之间的相关性为 0.85,BW 与 TD 之间的相关性为 0.78。方法与组织学评分之间的相关性为中度(ICDAS 为 0.63,BW 为 0.61)。ROC 曲线下面积 ICDAS 明显大于 BW(p<0.0001)。ICDAS 的特异性明显低于 BW(p=0.0269,79%对 94%);然而,ICDAS 的敏感性明显高于 BW(p<0.0001,83%对 44%)。这项研究的数据表明,视觉检查(ICDAS)在窝沟龋检测中的性能优于影像学检查。ICDAS 与 TD 密切相关。尽管 ICDAS 与 BW 的相关性较低,但它在临床决策过程中仍然具有价值。