Department of Dentistry, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada.
Department of Public and Global Affairs, Fairleigh Dickson University, Vancouver, Canada.
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Sep 29;24(1):1160. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04934-y.
Early detection of caries is essential for applying non-surgical treatment procedures and preventing the formation of cavitated lesions leading to unnecessary removal of tooth structure. Understanding dentists' preferences for caries detection tools can inform stakeholders about their strategies and knowledge of contemporary, evidence-based caries management approaches. However, there is a lack of research exploring the detection methods of caries commonly used by dentists in Ontario, Canada. The objective of this study was to investigate the methods of caries detection and diagnosis preferred by dentists in Ontario.
A 21-item self-reported survey was mailed to one thousand Ontario dental practices in the Winter of 2022. Descriptive and bivariate data analysis were performed to determine the associations between: demographics and professional practice characteristics (explanatory variables), and methods for detecting and diagnosing dental caries (outcome variables) using SPSS Statistics 29.0.
A total of 325 dentists (33%) responded to the survey, with 274 answering all of the questions completely. The highest proportion of respondents were 35-44 years of age (32.8%) and male (53.4%). More than half of the respondents reported using a dental explorer to assess primary occlusal caries (57.6%), secondary caries (57.1%), and cervical caries (57.5%). Likewise, 57.9% of the participants reported using dental radiographs to diagnose proximal caries. Among additional caries detection tools, digital radiography (89.8%) and traditional radiography (84.7%) were the most used methods/modalities, while cone beam computed tomography was the least (12.8%). Most study participants did not use any caries classification system (77.7%) or caries risk assessment tool (85.3%).
Participants preferred conventional methods for caries detection, instead of contemporary visual-tactile caries lesions classification and/or caries risk assessment systems. These findings indicate a need for continuing dental education programs tailored to evidence-based caries management approaches.
早期发现龋齿对于应用非手术治疗程序和防止形成空洞性病变从而导致不必要地去除牙体结构至关重要。了解牙医对龋齿检测工具的偏好可以使利益相关者了解他们的策略和对当代循证龋齿管理方法的了解。然而,目前缺乏研究探索加拿大安大略省牙医常用的龋齿检测方法。本研究的目的是调查安大略省牙医常用的龋齿检测和诊断方法。
2022 年冬季,向安大略省的 1000 家牙科诊所邮寄了一份 21 项的自我报告调查。使用 SPSS Statistics 29.0 进行描述性和双变量数据分析,以确定以下因素之间的关联:人口统计学和专业实践特征(解释变量)与检测和诊断龋齿的方法(结果变量)。
共有 325 名牙医(33%)对调查做出了回应,其中 274 名牙医完整回答了所有问题。回答者中年龄在 35-44 岁(32.8%)和男性(53.4%)的比例最高。超过一半的受访者报告使用牙科探针评估原发性咬合面龋齿(57.6%)、继发性龋齿(57.1%)和颈部龋齿(57.5%)。同样,57.9%的参与者报告使用牙科射线照相术诊断邻面龋齿。在其他龋齿检测工具中,数字射线照相术(89.8%)和传统射线照相术(84.7%)是最常用的方法/模式,而锥形束计算机断层扫描术的使用率最低(12.8%)。大多数研究参与者没有使用任何龋齿分类系统(77.7%)或龋齿风险评估工具(85.3%)。
参与者更喜欢传统的龋齿检测方法,而不是现代的视觉触觉龋齿病变分类和/或龋齿风险评估系统。这些发现表明需要开展针对循证龋齿管理方法的继续教育计划。