Suppr超能文献

运用潜在类别分析方法探究莫桑比克民众对蚊虫控制技术的偏好。

Investigating preferences for mosquito-control technologies in Mozambique with latent class analysis.

机构信息

Department of Communication Arts & Sciences and the Methodology Center, the Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.

出版信息

Malar J. 2011 Jul 21;10:200. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-10-200.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is common practice to seek the opinions of future end-users during the development of innovations. Thus, the aim of this study is to investigate latent classes of users in Mozambique based on their preferences for mosquito-control technology attributes and covariates of these classes, as well as to explore which current technologies meet these preferences.

METHODS

Surveys were administered in five rural villages in Mozambique. The data were analysed with latent class analysis.

RESULTS

This study showed that users' preferences for malaria technologies varied, and people could be categorized into four latent classes based on shared preferences. The largest class, constituting almost half of the respondents, would not avoid a mosquito-control technology because of its cost, heat, odour, potential to make other health issues worse, ease of keeping clean, or inadequate mosquito control. The other three groups are characterized by the attributes which would make them avoid a technology; these groups are labelled as the bites class, by-products class, and multiple-concerns class. Statistically significant covariates included literacy, self-efficacy, willingness to try new technologies, and perceived seriousness of malaria for the household.

CONCLUSIONS

To become widely diffused, best practices suggest that end-users should be included in product development to ensure that preferred attributes or traits are considered. This study demonstrates that end-user preferences can be very different and that one malaria control technology will not satisfy everyone.

摘要

背景

在创新开发过程中征求未来最终用户的意见是常见做法。因此,本研究的目的是基于他们对控制蚊虫技术属性的偏好以及这些属性的协变量,来调查莫桑比克用户的潜在类别,并探讨哪些现有技术符合这些偏好。

方法

在莫桑比克的五个农村村庄进行了调查。使用潜在类别分析对数据进行了分析。

结果

本研究表明,用户对疟疾技术的偏好存在差异,并且可以根据共同的偏好将人们分为四个潜在类别。最大的类别,几乎占受访者的一半,不会因为成本、热量、气味、可能使其他健康问题恶化、清洁保养容易或控制蚊虫效果不佳而避免使用蚊虫控制技术。其他三个群体的特点是会因为某些属性而避免使用技术;这些群体被标记为叮咬类、副产品类和多重问题类。具有统计学意义的协变量包括文化程度、自我效能感、尝试新技术的意愿以及家庭对疟疾的严重程度的认知。

结论

为了广泛传播,最佳实践建议应将最终用户纳入产品开发过程中,以确保考虑到他们所偏好的属性或特点。本研究表明,最终用户的偏好可能存在很大差异,一种疟疾控制技术不会满足所有人的需求。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Feasibility of malaria elimination.疟疾消除的可行性。
Lancet. 2011 Feb 19;377(9766):638, author reply 638. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60229-8.
2
Call to action: priorities for malaria elimination.行动呼吁:疟疾消除的优先事项。
Lancet. 2010 Nov 6;376(9752):1517-21. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61500-0. Epub 2010 Oct 28.
7
PROC LCA: A SAS Procedure for Latent Class Analysis.PROC LCA:一种用于潜在类别分析的SAS程序。
Struct Equ Modeling. 2007;14(4):671-694. doi: 10.1080/10705510701575602.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验