• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

适合评估患者导航的患者报告结局测量。

Patient-reported outcome measures suitable to assessment of patient navigation.

机构信息

Departments of Family Medicine and Community and Preventive Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 2011 Aug;117(15 Suppl):3603-17. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26260.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.26260
PMID:21780095
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4407470/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are measures completed by patients to capture outcomes that are meaningful and valued by patients. To help standardize PRO measures in patient navigation research and program evaluation, the Patient-Reported Outcomes Working Group (PROWG) was convened as part of the American Cancer Society's National Patient Navigator Leadership Summit.

METHODS

The PROWG consisted of clinicians, researchers, and program managers from a variety of perspectives who developed a set of recommended PRO measures across the cancer continuum (ie, screening, diagnostic follow-up, treatment, survivorship, end of life) as well as those useful for assessing family caregivers. Measures were recommended based on face validity, responsiveness to navigation, reliability, and construct validity in relevant populations. Other considerations included readability, existence of multiple language versions, the existence of norm groups, and respondent burden.

RESULTS

The PROWG reached consensus on measures for use in the domains of treatment adherence; perceived barriers to care; satisfaction with cancer care; satisfaction with patient navigation services; working alliance with patient navigator; perceived knowledge/competence/self-efficacy; functional assessment/symptom burden; global quality of life; specific quality-of-life symptoms (eg, depression, anxiety); and perceived cultural competency of the navigator. In domains where validated measures were found lacking, recommendations were made for areas of needed scale development.

CONCLUSIONS

These measures should guide research and programmatic evaluation of patient navigation.

摘要

背景

患者报告的结局(PROs)是患者完成的测量,以捕捉对患者有意义和有价值的结局。为了帮助标准化患者导航研究和计划评估中的 PRO 测量,患者报告结局工作组(PROWG)作为美国癌症协会国家患者导航员领导力峰会的一部分而成立。

方法

PROWG 由来自不同视角的临床医生、研究人员和项目管理人员组成,他们在癌症连续体(即筛查、诊断随访、治疗、生存、生命末期)中开发了一系列推荐的 PRO 测量,以及那些用于评估家庭照顾者的有用的测量。根据外观有效性、对导航的响应性、可靠性和相关人群中的构念有效性来推荐测量。其他考虑因素包括可读性、存在多种语言版本、存在规范组以及受访者负担。

结果

PROWG 在以下领域的测量方面达成了共识:治疗依从性;护理障碍感知;癌症护理满意度;对患者导航服务的满意度;与患者导航员的工作联盟;感知知识/能力/自我效能;功能评估/症状负担;整体生活质量;特定生活质量症状(例如,抑郁、焦虑);以及导航员的感知文化能力。在发现缺乏经过验证的测量的领域,建议制定需要开发的量表领域。

结论

这些测量应该指导患者导航的研究和计划评估。

相似文献

1
Patient-reported outcome measures suitable to assessment of patient navigation.适合评估患者导航的患者报告结局测量。
Cancer. 2011 Aug;117(15 Suppl):3603-17. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26260.
2
Measuring the impact and potential of patient navigation: proposed common metrics and beyond.衡量患者导航的影响和潜力:拟议的通用指标及其他。
Cancer. 2011 Aug;117(15 Suppl):3537-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26265.
3
Patients, family caregivers, and patient navigators: a partnership approach.患者、家属护理人员和患者导航员:一种伙伴关系方法。
Cancer. 2011 Aug;117(15 Suppl):3592-3602. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26263.
4
Patient navigation in breast cancer: a systematic review.乳腺癌患者导航:系统评价。
Cancer Nurs. 2010 Mar-Apr;33(2):127-40. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e3181c40401.
5
Psychometric development and reliability analysis of a patient satisfaction with interpersonal relationship with navigator measure: a multi-site patient navigation research program study.患者对导航员人际关系满意度量表的心理计量学发展和信度分析:一项多站点患者导航研究计划研究。
Psychooncology. 2012 Sep;21(9):986-92. doi: 10.1002/pon.2002. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
6
Survivorship navigation outcome measures: a report from the ACS patient navigation working group on survivorship navigation.生存导航结局指标:美国癌症协会患者导航工作组关于生存导航的报告。
Cancer. 2011 Aug;117(15 Suppl):3575-84. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26261.
7
Cross-cultural validation of a Patient Satisfaction with Interpersonal Relationship with Navigator measure: a multi-site patient navigation research study.跨文化验证患者对与导航员关系满意度的测量:一项多地点患者导航研究。
Psychooncology. 2012 Dec;21(12):1309-15. doi: 10.1002/pon.2018. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
8
Increasing health service access by expanding disease coverage and adding patient navigation: challenges for patient satisfaction.通过扩大疾病覆盖范围和增加患者导航来增加卫生服务获取途径:患者满意度面临的挑战。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Mar 6;20(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-5009-x.
9
Metrics for evaluating patient navigation during cancer diagnosis and treatment: crafting a policy-relevant research agenda for patient navigation in cancer care.用于评估癌症诊断和治疗期间患者导航的指标:制定癌症护理中患者导航的相关政策研究议程。
Cancer. 2011 Aug;117(15 Suppl):3565-74. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26269.
10
Implementing and measuring the impact of patient navigation at a comprehensive community cancer center.在一家综合性社区癌症中心实施并衡量患者导航服务的影响。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2010 Jan;37(1):61-8. doi: 10.1188/10.ONF.61-68.

引用本文的文献

1
Identification of interventions to improve patient experienced quality of care in transitions between healthcare settings: a scoping review.确定改善医疗环境之间患者体验护理质量的干预措施:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 30;24(1):1155. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11609-5.
2
Content validity of patient-reported measures evaluating experiences of the quality of transitions in healthcare settings-a scoping review.评估患者在医疗保健环境中经历的过渡质量的报告测量的内容效度:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 22;24(1):828. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11298-0.
3
Evaluation of the implementation of single points of access for unattached patients in primary care and their effects: a study protocol.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychometric development and reliability analysis of a patient satisfaction with interpersonal relationship with navigator measure: a multi-site patient navigation research program study.患者对导航员人际关系满意度量表的心理计量学发展和信度分析:一项多站点患者导航研究计划研究。
Psychooncology. 2012 Sep;21(9):986-92. doi: 10.1002/pon.2002. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
2
Community navigation for stroke survivors and their care partners: description and evaluation.社区导航在脑卒中幸存者及其照顾者中的应用:描述与评估。
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2010 May-Jun;17(3):183-90. doi: 10.1310/tsr1703-183.
3
Relative to the general US population, chronic diseases are associated with poorer health-related quality of life as measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS).
评价初级保健中未附属于任何医疗机构的患者的单点接入实施情况及其效果的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 3;13(3):e070956. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070956.
4
Patient navigation for colorectal cancer screening in deprived areas: the COLONAV cluster randomized controlled trial.贫困地区结直肠癌筛查中的患者导航:COLONAV 集群随机对照试验。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Jan 6;23(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10169-3.
5
Improving Cancer Care Delivery: Learnings for Oncology Nurses and Patient Navigation From a National Quality Survey.改善癌症护理服务:从一项全国质量调查中汲取的肿瘤护理与患者导航经验教训。
J Adv Pract Oncol. 2022 Jul;13(5):484-493. doi: 10.6004/jadpro.2022.13.5.2. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
6
A Study Protocol for the Management of Children With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Based on ePROs.一项基于电子患者报告结局(ePROs)的幼年特发性关节炎患儿管理研究方案。
Front Pediatr. 2022 Jul 6;10:905182. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.905182. eCollection 2022.
7
Web-Based Peer Navigation for Men with Prostate Cancer and Their Family Caregivers: A Pilot Feasibility Study.基于网络的前列腺癌患者及其家属同伴导航:一项试点可行性研究。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Jun 15;29(6):4285-4299. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29060343.
8
Healthcare Predictors of Information Dissemination About Genetic Risks.遗传风险信息传播的医疗保健预测因素。
Cancer Control. 2022 Jan-Dec;29:10732748221104666. doi: 10.1177/10732748221104666.
9
Using Concept Mapping to Explore Interpersonal Communication Components of Patient Navigation in Breast Cancer Care.运用概念图探索乳腺癌护理中患者导航的人际沟通要素。
Cancer Nurs. 2023;46(4):321-330. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000001118. Epub 2022 Dec 11.
10
Professional patient navigation in a hospital setting: a randomized controlled trial.医院环境中的专业患者导航:一项随机对照试验。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Apr;29(4):2111-2123. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05721-5. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
与一般美国人群相比,慢性疾病与较差的健康相关生活质量相关,这是通过患者报告的结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)进行测量的。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Nov;63(11):1195-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.012. Epub 2010 Aug 5.
4
Patient navigation in breast cancer: a systematic review.乳腺癌患者导航:系统评价。
Cancer Nurs. 2010 Mar-Apr;33(2):127-40. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e3181c40401.
5
The Alberta Cardiac Access Collaborative: improving the cardiac patient journey.艾伯塔省心脏疾病诊疗协作项目:改善心脏病患者就医流程。
Healthc Q. 2009;13 Spec No:85-90. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2009.21104.
6
Use of existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments and their modification: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Evaluating and Documenting Content Validity for the Use of Existing Instruments and Their Modification PRO Task Force Report.使用现有患者报告结局(PRO)工具及其修改版:ISPOR 现有工具使用及其修改版的内容效度评估和文件记录的良好研究实践 PRO 工作组报告。
Value Health. 2009 Nov-Dec;12(8):1075-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00603.x. Epub 2009 Sep 25.
7
National Cancer Institute Patient Navigation Research Program: methods, protocol, and measures.美国国立癌症研究所患者导航研究项目:方法、方案与措施
Cancer. 2008 Dec 15;113(12):3391-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23960.
8
Patient navigation: state of the art or is it science?患者导航:是先进技术还是科学?
Cancer. 2008 Oct 15;113(8):1999-2010. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23815.
9
The conceptualization and measurement of therapeutic alliance: an empirical review.治疗联盟的概念化与测量:一项实证综述。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2008 Oct;28(7):1167-87. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2008.04.002. Epub 2008 Apr 23.
10
Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes.确定患者报告结局的反应性和最小重要差异的推荐方法。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Feb;61(2):102-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012. Epub 2007 Aug 3.