Department of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, China.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Nov;15(5):507-14. doi: 10.3171/2011.6.SPINE11250. Epub 2011 Jul 22.
With the increasing advocacy for total disc replacement (TDR) as a potential alternative to fusion in the management of lumbar degenerative disc disease, intradiscal pressures (IDPs) and facet joint stresses at the adjacent levels of spine have generated considerable interest. The purpose of this study was to compare adjacent-level IDPs and facet joint stresses among TDR, discectomy, and fusion.
Ten fresh human cadaveric lumbar specimens (L2-S1) were subjected to an unconstrained load in axial torsion, lateral bending, flexion, and extension by using multidirectional flexibility test. Four surgical treatment modes-control (disc intact), discectomy, TDR, and fusion-were tested in sequential order at L4-5. During testing, the IDPs and facet forces following each treatment were calculated at the adjacent vertebral levels (L3-4 and L5-S1).
Intradiscal pressures and facet force pressures were similar between the intact condition and the TDR reconstruction at the L3-4 and L5-S1 levels under all loading conditions (p > 0.05). Compared with the intact and TDR groups, the discectomy and fusion groups had higher IDPs at the L3-4 and L5-S1 levels under all loading conditions (p < 0.05). No significant difference in the facet force pressure was noted among the intact, discectomy, and TDR groups at the L3-4 and L5-S1 levels under any loading conditions (p > 0.05). However, the facet force pressure produced for fusion was significantly higher than the mean values obtained for the intact, discectomy, and TDR groups at the L3-4 and L5-S1 levels under all loading conditions (p < 0.05).
Lumbar TDR maintained adjacent-level IDPs and facet force pressures near the values for intact spines, whereas adjacent-level IDPs tended to increase after discectomy or fusion and facet forces tended to increase after fusion.
随着全椎间盘置换术(TDR)作为治疗腰椎退行性疾病的一种潜在替代融合术的方法越来越受到推崇,椎间盘内压力(IDP)和脊柱相邻节段关节突关节的压力引起了相当大的关注。本研究的目的是比较 TDR、椎间盘切除术和融合术治疗相邻节段的 IDP 和关节突关节压力。
10 个新鲜的人体腰椎标本(L2-S1)在轴向扭转、侧屈、屈伸的多维灵活性试验中受到无约束的载荷。在 L4-5 节段,依次测试了四种手术治疗模式(对照组-椎间盘完整、椎间盘切除术、TDR 和融合术)。在测试过程中,计算了每种治疗方法后相邻节段(L3-4 和 L5-S1)的 IDP 和关节突关节力。
在所有加载条件下,与完整状态和 L3-4 和 L5-S1 水平的 TDR 重建相比,椎间盘完整状态和 TDR 重建的 IDP 和关节突关节力相似(p>0.05)。与完整组和 TDR 组相比,在所有加载条件下,椎间盘切除术和融合术组的 L3-4 和 L5-S1 水平的 IDP 更高(p<0.05)。在任何加载条件下,L3-4 和 L5-S1 水平的关节突关节力均无明显差异,完整组、椎间盘切除术组和 TDR 组之间(p>0.05)。然而,在所有加载条件下,融合术产生的关节突关节力明显高于完整组、椎间盘切除术组和 TDR 组的平均值(p<0.05)。
腰椎 TDR 保持了相邻节段 IDP 和关节突关节力接近完整脊柱的值,而椎间盘切除术后相邻节段 IDP 趋于增加,融合术后关节突关节力趋于增加。