Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BB, UK.
Trends Ecol Evol. 2011 Oct;26(10):541-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.06.011. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
Ecological restoration is becoming regarded as a major strategy for increasing the provision of ecosystem services as well as reversing biodiversity losses. Here, we show that restoration projects can be effective in enhancing both, but that conflicts can arise, especially if single services are targeted in isolation. Furthermore, recovery of biodiversity and services can be slow and incomplete. Despite this uncertainty, new methods of ecosystem service valuation are suggesting that the economic benefits of restoration can outweigh costs. Payment for Ecosystem Service schemes could therefore provide incentives for restoration, but require development to ensure biodiversity and multiple services are enhanced and the needs of different stakeholders are met. Such approaches must be implemented widely if new global restoration targets are to be achieved.
生态修复正逐渐被视为增加生态系统服务供给和扭转生物多样性丧失的主要策略。在这里，我们表明，修复项目可以有效地增强这两个方面，但也可能会出现冲突，特别是如果单独针对单一服务进行修复。此外，生物多样性和服务的恢复可能会缓慢且不完整。尽管存在这种不确定性，但生态系统服务价值的新方法表明，修复的经济效益可能超过成本。因此，生态系统服务付费计划可以为修复提供激励，但需要进一步开发以确保生物多样性和多种服务得到增强，并满足不同利益相关者的需求。如果要实现新的全球修复目标，就必须广泛实施这些方法。
