NIHR King's Patient Safety and Service Quality Research Centre, King's College London, Strand Bridge House, 138-142 Strand, London WC2R 1HH, United Kingdom.
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom.
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Aug;73(4):522-529. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.014. Epub 2011 Jul 5.
Over the past two decades, an international trend of exposing public health services to different forms of economic organisation has emerged. In the English National Health Service (NHS), care is currently provided through a quasi-market including 'diverse' providers from the private and third sector. The predominant scheme through which private sector companies have been awarded NHS contracts is the Independent Sector Treatment Centre (ISTC) programme. ISTCs were designed to produce innovative models of service delivery for elective care and stimulate innovation among incumbent NHS providers. This paper investigates these claims using qualitative data on the impact of an ISTC upon a local health economy (LHE) composed of NHS organisations in England. Using the case of elective orthopaedic surgery, we conducted semi-structured interviews with senior managers from incumbent NHS providers and an ISTC in 2009. We show that ISTCs exhibit a different relationship with frontline clinicians because they counteract the power of professional communities associated with the NHS. This has positive and negative consequences for innovation. ISTCs have introduced new routines unencumbered by the extant norms of professional communities, but they appear to represent weaker learning environments and do not reproduce cooperation across organisational boundaries to the same extent as incumbent NHS providers.
在过去的二十年中,一种将公共卫生服务暴露于各种形式的经济组织的国际趋势已经出现。在英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)中,目前通过包括私营和第三部门的“多样化”提供者在内的准市场提供护理。私营部门公司获得 NHS 合同的主要计划是独立部门治疗中心(ISTC)计划。ISTC 的设计目的是为选择性护理提供创新的服务交付模式,并刺激现有 NHS 提供者的创新。本文使用关于 ISTC 对由英格兰 NHS 组织组成的本地卫生经济(LHE)的影响的定性数据来调查这些说法。我们选择了择期矫形外科手术的案例,于 2009 年对现有 NHS 提供者和 ISTC 的高级管理人员进行了半结构化访谈。我们表明,ISTC 与一线临床医生之间存在不同的关系,因为它们削弱了与 NHS 相关的专业社区的权力。这对创新有积极和消极的影响。ISTC 引入了不受专业社区现有规范约束的新例程,但它们似乎代表了较弱的学习环境,并且不像现有 NHS 提供者那样在组织边界上进行合作。