• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣乳房重建的成本分析]

[A cost analysis of DIEP flap in breast reconstruction].

作者信息

Marchac A, Bosc R, Benjoar M-D, Hivelin M, Lepage C, Lantieri L

机构信息

Service de chirurgie plastique réparatrice et esthétique, hôpital Henri-Mondor, Créteil, France.

出版信息

Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2011 Aug;56(4):275-9. doi: 10.1016/j.anplas.2011.06.001. Epub 2011 Jul 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.anplas.2011.06.001
PMID:21782310
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We postulate that the absence of a CPT code for DIEP (deep inferior epigastric perforator) free flap in breast reconstruction is in part responsible for the delayed adoption of this modern technique in France. In order to provide data to our regulating health agency, we determined the cost of this technique compared to a gold standard. We performed a cost-identification study, comparing costs of DIEP free flap versus latissimus dorsi pedicled flap with implant (LD+I) in secondary breast reconstruction following irradiation.

METHODS

Over a 12-month period, direct medical and non-medical costs as well as indirect costs were recorded in both groups (DIEP and LD+I).

RESULTS

In an academic department funded by the national health system, total cost of a secondary breast reconstruction by DIEP free flap was 10,671 ± 3005€ (n=57) versus 8218 ± 2049€ (n=18) for the LD+I group (P<0.05). Mean OR occupation time was 390 ± 64minutes for DIEP versus 283 ± 44minutes for LD+I (P<0.05). Mean hospital stay was 6 ± 2 days for DIEP versus 5 ± 2 days for LD+I (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

DIEP free flap technique offers a long lasting breast reconstruction at an reasonable expense compared to the LD+I (+22%). Furthermore, in an academic department, collaboration of two microsurgeons during DIEP flaps allows OR times to drop significantly and become competitive with LD+I.

摘要

背景

我们推测,在法国,乳房重建中缺乏用于腹壁下深动脉穿支(DIEP)游离皮瓣的现行程序编码,部分导致了这项现代技术的采用延迟。为了向我们的健康监管机构提供数据,我们确定了与金标准相比这项技术的成本。我们进行了一项成本识别研究,比较了DIEP游离皮瓣与背阔肌带蒂皮瓣联合植入物(LD+I)在放疗后二期乳房重建中的成本。

方法

在12个月的时间里,记录了两组(DIEP和LD+I)的直接医疗和非医疗成本以及间接成本。

结果

在一个由国家卫生系统资助的学术部门,DIEP游离皮瓣二期乳房重建的总成本为10671±3005欧元(n=57),而LD+I组为8218±2049欧元(n=18)(P<0.05)。DIEP的平均手术占用时间为390±64分钟,而LD+I为283±44分钟(P<0.05)。DIEP的平均住院时间为6±2天,而LD+I为5±2天(P>0.05)。

结论

与LD+I相比(增加22%),DIEP游离皮瓣技术以合理的费用提供了持久的乳房重建。此外,在一个学术部门,两名显微外科医生在DIEP皮瓣手术中的协作可使手术时间显著缩短,并与LD+I具有竞争力。

相似文献

1
[A cost analysis of DIEP flap in breast reconstruction].[腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣乳房重建的成本分析]
Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2011 Aug;56(4):275-9. doi: 10.1016/j.anplas.2011.06.001. Epub 2011 Jul 22.
2
Double pedicle deep inferior epigastric perforator/muscle-sparing TRAM flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction.双蒂腹壁下深动脉穿支/保留肌肉的横行腹直肌肌皮瓣用于单侧乳房重建。
Ann Plast Surg. 2007 Apr;58(4):359-63. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000239818.28900.81.
3
Evolving Trends in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: Is the Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap Taking Over?自体乳房重建的发展趋势:腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣是否正在占据主导地位?
Ann Plast Surg. 2016 May;76(5):489-93. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000339.
4
Medium-term cost analysis of breast reconstructions in a single Dutch centre: a comparison of implants, implants preceded by tissue expansion, LD transpositions and DIEP flaps.荷兰单一中心乳房重建术的中期成本分析:假体、假体联合组织扩张、LD 转位术和 DIEP 皮瓣的比较。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011 Aug;64(8):1043-53. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2010.12.028. Epub 2011 Feb 12.
5
A cost-effectiveness analysis of DIEP vs free MS-TRAM flap for microsurgical breast reconstruction.腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣与游离腹直肌肌皮瓣用于显微外科乳房重建的成本效益分析。
J Surg Oncol. 2019 Mar;119(3):388-396. doi: 10.1002/jso.25325. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
6
[Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) free flap in immediate breast reconstruction].[腹壁下深动脉穿支(DIEP)游离皮瓣在即刻乳房重建中的应用]
Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2004 Jan;20(1):6-9.
7
Comparison of the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap and free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap in postmastectomy reconstruction: a cost-effectiveness analysis.乳房切除术后重建中腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣与游离腹直肌肌皮瓣的比较:成本效益分析
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 May;113(6):1650-61. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000117196.61020.fd.
8
[Fibrin sealant significantly decrease postoperative drainage in breast reconstruction by deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap].[纤维蛋白封闭剂显著减少腹壁下深动脉穿支(DIEP)皮瓣乳房重建术后的引流量]
Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2012 Feb;57(1):50-8. doi: 10.1016/j.anplas.2010.10.013. Epub 2011 Jan 14.
9
Comparison of outcomes and donor-site morbidity in unilateral free TRAM versus DIEP flap breast reconstruction.单侧游离腹直肌肌皮瓣与腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣乳房重建的结局及供区并发症比较。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60(11):1219-24. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.07.008. Epub 2007 Aug 27.
10
The value of microvascular breast reconstruction: Cost equivalence of TRAM and DIEP flaps implications in the era of CMS reforms.微血管乳房重建的价值:TRAM 和 DIEP 皮瓣的成本等效性——CMS 改革时代的意义。
Microsurgery. 2024 May;44(4):e31185. doi: 10.1002/micr.31185.

引用本文的文献

1
Single-stage Latissimus Dorsi Breast Reconstruction Using Spectrum Devices: Outcomes and Technique.使用频谱设备进行单阶段背阔肌乳房重建:结果与技术
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 May 3;9(5):e3282. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003282. eCollection 2021 May.
2
The deep inferior epigastric perforator and pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap in breast reconstruction: a comparative study.乳房重建中腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣与带蒂腹直肌肌皮瓣的比较研究
Arch Plast Surg. 2013 May;40(3):187-91. doi: 10.5999/aps.2013.40.3.187. Epub 2013 May 16.
3
The gracilis myocutaneous free flap: a quantitative analysis of the fasciocutaneous blood supply and implications for autologous breast reconstruction.
股薄肌肌皮瓣:对筋膜皮血管供应的定量分析及其对自体乳房重建的影响。
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36367. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036367. Epub 2012 May 9.