Catholic University College South-West-Flanders, KATHO, Department HIVB, Wilgenstraat 32, 8800 Roeselare, Belgium.
Infect Genet Evol. 2011 Dec;11(8):2133-7. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2011.07.008. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
Many reports described the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in different livestock animals from one-species farms. However, in no published reports the prevalence on mixed poultry-pig farms was mentioned, nor the possible relation in MRSA colonization between those two species on one farm, and the possible role of the farmer in the dissemination of MRSA between those two species. Furthermore, no data is available on the optimal sampling site to detect MRSA in broilers. Therefore this study aimed to determine the most suitable sample location in broiler chickens for MRSA and the within flock prevalence of MRSA in various broiler flocks and compared this with the MRSA prevalence in pigs, the colonization of the farmer and the contamination in the barn environment in three mixed poultry-pig farms. MRSA was most frequently isolated from the cloaca and nose shell and to a lesser extent from the skin beneath the wing and the pharynx. The relative sensitivity of the different anatomical sites was, 44.4% for the cloaca, 33.3% for the nose shell, 16.7% for the skin beneath the wing and 5.6% for the pharynx. Based upon these relative sensitivities combining cloaca and nose shell would increase the chance of MRSA detection. A rather low within flock prevalence of MRSA varying between 0% and 28% was detected in broilers, whereas in pigs on the same farms the within herd prevalence varied between 82% and 92%. No MRSA contamination in the direct barn environment of the broilers was found, this in contrast to the environment of the pigs, indicating a relationship between MRSA prevalence and contamination in the environment. Two farmers were continuously colonized, while the third one was only once. In conclusion, a major difference was seen in MRSA occurrence between broilers and pigs from the same farm. This may suggest that broilers are naturally less susceptible to MRSA ST398 colonization than pigs. Conversely, short production time in broilers, vacancy of the barn environment during one week and the higher frequency of disinfection might also explain the lower prevalence in broilers. The farmer may play an important role in the dissemination of MRSA from pigs to poultry, especially in mixed farms where pigs are highly colonized and may act as a reservoir for MRSA ST398 carriage in humans.
许多报告描述了从单一物种农场的不同牲畜中发现耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌 (MRSA) 的流行情况。然而,目前还没有关于混合家禽-猪养殖场中 MRSA 流行情况的报道,也没有关于同一养殖场中这两种物种之间 MRSA 定植的可能关系,以及农民在这两种物种之间传播 MRSA 可能扮演的角色的报道。此外,目前尚无关于在肉鸡中检测 MRSA 的最佳采样部位的相关数据。因此,本研究旨在确定在肉鸡中最适合检测 MRSA 的采样部位,并比较不同肉鸡群中 MRSA 的群内流行率与猪、农民定植情况和三个混合家禽-猪养殖场中畜舍环境的污染情况。MRSA 最常从泄殖腔和鼻腔壳中分离出来,从翅膀下的皮肤和咽部分离出来的比例较小。不同解剖部位的相对敏感性为,泄殖腔为 44.4%,鼻腔壳为 33.3%,翅膀下的皮肤为 16.7%,咽部为 5.6%。基于这些相对敏感性,如果将泄殖腔和鼻腔壳结合起来,将增加检测到 MRSA 的机会。在肉鸡中检测到的 MRSA 群内流行率相当低,在 0%至 28%之间变化,而在同一农场的猪中,群内流行率在 82%至 92%之间变化。在肉鸡的直接畜舍环境中没有发现 MRSA 污染,而在猪的环境中则有,这表明 MRSA 流行率与环境污染之间存在关系。有两名农民持续定植,而第三名农民只定植过一次。总之,来自同一农场的肉鸡和猪之间在 MRSA 发生方面存在很大差异。这可能表明,与猪相比,肉鸡对 MRSA ST398 定植的天然抵抗力较低。相反,肉鸡的生产时间较短,畜舍环境在一周内空置,以及更高的消毒频率也可能解释了肉鸡中流行率较低的原因。农民可能在从猪向家禽传播 MRSA 方面发挥了重要作用,特别是在混合农场中,猪高度定植,可能成为人类携带 MRSA ST398 的储主。