How intensive should radiotherapy for head and neck cancer with synchronous distant metastases be? Review of cases.

PURPOSE

Given the differences in treatment objectives among oncologists and complexities of standards of therapy for advanced head and neck cancer (HNC), we sought to determine whether HNC patients with simultaneous distant metastases (M1) benefit from aggressive therapeutic intervention.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Among the 1,988 patients diagnosed with HNC during a 22-year period, 7 patients with synchronous M1 tumors were identified. Of these individuals, 4 were treated with a prolonged course of radiotherapy for HNC (group A) and 3 were not (group B).

RESULTS

The median survival and 60-day mortality rate in group A were 14 months and 0%, respectively, whereas the corresponding observations for group B were 5.5 months and 50%. No difference in HNC stage or M1 extent was present between the 2 groups. The patients composing group A were older than those in group B.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that some benefit may be obtained by the application of a full course of irradiation for HNC with synchronous M1 disease. The practice of intensive radiotherapy for this particular complicated neoplastic condition needs to be reviewed, considering the health care reform and emphasis on cost-effectiveness in the near future.