Suppr超能文献

髓内棒和水泥静态间隔物构建物在慢性感染的全膝关节置换术中的应用。

Intramedullary rod and cement static spacer construct in chronically infected total knee arthroplasty.

机构信息

University of Chicago, New York, New York 10021, USA.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2012 Feb;27(2):253-259.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.04.021. Epub 2011 Jul 23.

Abstract

Two-stage reimplantation, with interval antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer, is the preferred treatment of prosthetic knee joint infections. In medically compromised hosts with prior failed surgeries, the outcomes are poor. Articulating spacers in such patients render the knee unstable; static spacers have risks of dislocation and extensor mechanism injury. We examined 58 infected total knee arthroplasties with extensive bone and soft tissue loss, treated with resection arthroplasty and intramedullary tibiofemoral rod and antibiotic-laden cement spacer. Thirty-seven patients underwent delayed reimplantation. Most patients (83.8%) were free from recurrent infection at mean follow-up of 29.4 months. Reinfection occurred in 16.2%, which required debridement. Twenty-one patients with poor operative risks remained with the spacer for 11.4 months. All patients, during spacer phase, had brace-free ambulation with simulated tibiofemoral fusion, without bone loss or loss of limb length.

摘要

二期再植入术,联合间隔期抗生素载药水泥间隔物,是治疗人工膝关节感染的首选方法。对于存在先前手术失败且合并医学合并症的宿主,其治疗效果较差。对于此类患者,活动间隔物会导致膝关节不稳定;而静态间隔物则存在脱位和伸肌装置损伤的风险。我们检查了 58 例因广泛骨和软组织损失而导致感染的全膝关节置换术,这些患者接受了关节切除成形术和髓内胫股杆及抗生素载药水泥间隔物治疗。37 例患者接受了延迟再植入术。在平均 29.4 个月的随访中,大多数患者(83.8%)未出现复发性感染。16.2%的患者发生了再感染,需要清创。21 例因手术风险较高的患者仍保留间隔物 11.4 个月。在间隔期,所有患者都无需支具辅助步行,实现了模拟的胫股融合,且没有发生骨丢失或肢体长度丢失。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验