Department of Cardiology, LTSI INSERM U, Hopital Pontchaillou-CHU, Rennes, France.
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Oct 1;108(7):1029-37. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.05.043. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
The effects of aging and of sustained athletic activity on the heart in men aged >50 years are unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the adaptation of the heart in athletic and sedentary men aged <35 and ≥50 years. Echocardiograms recorded at rest and during submaximal exercise were analyzed in 59 athletic seniors (S(ATH) group) and 16 sedentary seniors (S(SED) group) (age ≥50 years) and in 18 athletic youth (Y(ATH) group) and 27 sedentary youth (Y(SED) group) (age <35 years). All subjects were healthy. The reproducibility of measurements was examined, and the echocardiographic characteristics were compared among the study groups. No differences were found in baseline characteristics between the Y(ATH) and Y(SED) groups and between the S(ATH) and S(SED) groups, except for their exercise routines, consisting of >8 hours of bicycling per week in the athletic groups. Left ventricular mass was greater in the Y(ATH) than in the S(ATH) group (p <0.01) and greater in the S(ATH) than in the S(SED) group (p <0.001). Likewise, left ventricular volumes were greater in the athletic than in the sedentary groups (p <0.05), although they were smaller in the seniors than in youth (p <0.01). Left ventricular stroke volume was greater in the athletic than in the sedentary groups (p <0.001); global longitudinal strain during exercise was -20.0 ± 2.4% in the S(ATH) group and -22.1 ± 2.1% in the Y(ATH) group, compared to -19.2 ± 3.4% in the S(SED) group and -20.2 ± 2.4% in the Y(SED) group (p <0.05, athletic vs sedentary). The e' velocities recorded at the septal and lateral mitral annulus were higher at rest and during exercise (p <0.01) in the youth than in the senior groups. In conclusion, systolic and diastolic myocardial adaptation to regular exercise was significantly more prominent in young than in senior volunteers.
目前尚不清楚衰老和持续的运动活动对 50 岁以上男性心脏的影响。本研究旨在评估 35 岁以下和≥50 岁的运动和久坐男性心脏的适应性。对 59 名运动老年人(S(ATH)组)和 16 名久坐老年人(S(SED)组)(年龄≥50 岁)和 18 名运动年轻人(Y(ATH)组)和 27 名久坐年轻人(Y(SED)组)(年龄<35 岁)进行了休息时和亚最大运动时的超声心动图记录,并对这些测量值进行了分析。所有受试者均健康。检查了测量的可重复性,并比较了研究组之间的超声心动图特征。在 Y(ATH)和 Y(SED)组以及 S(ATH)和 S(SED)组之间,除了运动组每周骑自行车超过 8 小时外,在基线特征方面没有差异。与 S(ATH)组相比,Y(ATH)组的左心室质量更大(p<0.01),与 S(SED)组相比,S(ATH)组的左心室质量更大(p<0.001)。同样,与久坐组相比,运动组的左心室容积更大(p<0.05),尽管与年轻人相比,老年人的左心室容积较小(p<0.01)。与久坐组相比,运动组的左心室每搏量更大(p<0.001);与 S(SED)组相比,S(ATH)组和 Y(ATH)组运动时的整体纵向应变分别为-20.0±2.4%和-22.1±2.1%,而 S(SED)组和 Y(SED)组分别为-19.2±3.4%和-20.2±2.4%(p<0.05,运动组与久坐组相比)。与老年人组相比,年轻人组的室间隔和侧壁二尖瓣环的 e'速度在休息和运动时均较高(p<0.01)。总之,与老年志愿者相比,年轻人对规律运动的心肌收缩和舒张适应性更为明显。