Division of Nephrology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Crit Care Med. 2011 Dec;39(12):2665-71. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318228234b.
It has been suggested that fluid accumulation may delay recognition of acute kidney injury. We sought to determine the impact of fluid balance on the incidence of nondialysis requiring acute kidney injury in patients with acute lung injury and to describe associated outcomes, including mortality.
Analysis of the Fluid and Catheter Treatment Trial, a factorial randomized clinical trial of conservative vs. liberal fluid management and of management guided by a central venous vs. pulmonary artery catheter.
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network hospitals.
One thousand patients.
None.
The incidence of acute kidney injury, defined as an absolute rise in creatinine of ≥0.3 mg/dL or a relative change of >50% over 48 hrs, was examined before and after adjustment of serum creatinine for fluid balance. The incidence of acute kidney injury before adjustment for fluid balance was greater in those managed with the conservative fluid protocol (57% vs. 51%, p = .04). After adjustment for fluid balance, the incidence of acute kidney injury was greater in those managed with the liberal fluid protocol (66% vs. 58%, p = .007). Patients who met acute kidney injury criteria after adjustment of creatinine for fluid balance (but not before) had a mortality rate that was significantly greater than those who did not meet acute kidney injury criteria both before and after adjustment for fluid balance (31% vs. 12%, p < .001) and those who had acute kidney injury before but not after adjustment for fluid balance (31% vs. 11%, p = .005). The mortality of those patients meeting acute kidney injury criteria after but not before adjustment for fluid balance was similar to patients with acute kidney injury both before and after adjustment for fluid balance (31% vs. 38%, p = .18).
Fluid management influences serum creatinine and therefore the diagnosis of acute kidney injury using creatinine-based definitions. Patients with "unrecognized" acute kidney injury that is identified after adjusting for positive fluid balance have higher mortality rates, and patients who have acute kidney injury before but not after adjusting for fluid balance have lower mortality rates. Future studies of acute kidney injury should consider potential differences in serum creatinine caused by changes in fluid balance and the impact of these differences on diagnosis and prognosis.
有人认为,液体蓄积可能会延迟急性肾损伤的识别。我们旨在确定液体平衡对急性肺损伤患者中需要非透析治疗的急性肾损伤发生率的影响,并描述相关结局,包括死亡率。
对液体和导管治疗试验(Fluid and Catheter Treatment Trial)的分析,这是一项比较保守与宽松液体管理以及根据中心静脉或肺动脉导管进行管理的两因素随机临床试验。
急性呼吸窘迫综合征网络医院。
1000 名患者。
无。
在调整血清肌酐的液体平衡之前和之后,检查急性肾损伤的发生率,定义为肌酐绝对升高≥0.3mg/dL 或 48 小时内相对变化>50%。在未调整液体平衡时,采用保守液体方案治疗的患者急性肾损伤发生率更高(57%比 51%,p=0.04)。在调整液体平衡后,采用宽松液体方案治疗的患者急性肾损伤发生率更高(66%比 58%,p=0.007)。在调整肌酐的液体平衡后符合急性肾损伤标准的患者死亡率明显高于在调整液体平衡前后均不符合急性肾损伤标准的患者(31%比 12%,p<0.001),以及在调整液体平衡后符合急性肾损伤标准但在调整液体平衡前不符合急性肾损伤标准的患者(31%比 11%,p=0.005)。在调整液体平衡后符合但在调整液体平衡前不符合急性肾损伤标准的患者死亡率与在调整液体平衡前后均符合急性肾损伤标准的患者相似(31%比 38%,p=0.18)。
液体管理影响血清肌酐,因此基于肌酐的定义使用会影响急性肾损伤的诊断。在调整液体平衡后发现的“未识别”急性肾损伤患者死亡率更高,而在调整液体平衡后符合急性肾损伤标准但在调整液体平衡前不符合急性肾损伤标准的患者死亡率更低。未来的急性肾损伤研究应考虑液体平衡变化引起的血清肌酐的潜在差异,以及这些差异对诊断和预后的影响。