Suppr超能文献

经椎间孔硬膜外腔类固醇注射治疗腰椎间盘突出症:后路椎间盘内 versus 节后。

Lumbar retrodiscal versus post-ganglionic transforaminal epidural steroid injection for the treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc herniations.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Daegu Wooridul Spine Hospital, Daegu, South Korea.

出版信息

Pain Physician. 2011 Jul-Aug;14(4):353-60.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESIs) are procedures often utilized in the treatment of radicular pain. TFESIs with a preganglionic approach have been reported to be more effective than TFESIs performed using a classic approach. However, it is unknown whether TFESIs using a retrodiscal approach are as effective as other approaches.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of an epidural steroid injection (ESI) on radicular pain, we conducted a randomized, controlled trial comparing a retrodiscal approach with a classic approach to treat lumbar disc herniation.

DESIGN

A case control study.

METHODS

Forty patients were randomized to receive lumbar TFESIs with either a retrodiscal approach (n=20) or with a classic approach (n=20). Measurements were taken before as well as 4 and 8 weeks after treatment using a visual analog scale (VAS) score, Patient Satisfaction Index (PSI) and the Roland 5-point pain score.

RESULTS

In the retrodiscal group, there was a statistically significant improvement in the VAS score after injection compared to baseline. In the classic group, there was a statistically significant improvement in the VAS score after injection compared to baseline. There was no statistically significant difference in the VAS score, PSI, or the Roland 5-point pain score between those treated with a retrodiscal approache and those treated with a classic approach.

LIMITATIONS

Secondary outcomes were not measured and the study did not include a mid- or long-term follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

In this study, TFESIs performed using a retrodiscal or classic approach had similar effects on radicular pain. The classic and the retrodiscal transforaminal steroid injection resulted in equivalent pain relief.

摘要

背景

腰椎经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射(TFESI)是治疗神经根痛的常用方法。与经典入路相比,节前入路的 TFESI 被报道更有效。然而,经椎间盘后入路的 TFESI 是否与其他入路一样有效尚不清楚。

目的

为了研究硬膜外类固醇注射(ESI)对神经根痛的影响,我们进行了一项随机对照试验,比较了经椎间盘后入路和经典入路治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效。

设计

病例对照研究。

方法

40 例患者随机分为经椎间盘后入路(n=20)或经典入路(n=20)行腰椎 TFESI。治疗前、治疗后 4 周和 8 周分别采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)、患者满意度指数(PSI)和 Roland 5 分疼痛评分进行测量。

结果

在经椎间盘后入路组,注射后 VAS 评分与基线相比有统计学显著改善。在经典组,注射后 VAS 评分与基线相比有统计学显著改善。经椎间盘后入路组与经典入路组之间,VAS 评分、PSI 或 Roland 5 分疼痛评分无统计学显著差异。

局限性

未测量次要结局,且研究未包括中或长期随访期。

结论

在这项研究中,经椎间盘后入路和经典入路行 TFESI 对神经根痛的疗效相似。经典入路和经椎间盘后入路的经椎间孔类固醇注射均能达到等效的疼痛缓解。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验