Department of Clinical Chemistry (KCHL), Sint Franciscus Gasthuis, Kleiweg, PM Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Cytometry A. 2011 Sep;79(9):694-706. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.21105. Epub 2011 Jul 22.
Differential white blood cell count (dWBC) is a frequently used diagnostic tool. For most patient samples an automated blood counter produces a five-part differential count. If this dWBC does not meet pre-set criteria, microscopic dWBC is performed. Microscopy is labor intensive and requires sustained training of technicians. Inter-observer variation and statistical variation are significant, due to limited numbers of cells counted. Flow cytometry is a candidate reference method for dWBC. Advantages are immunological definitions and large number of measured cells. Our goal was to replace (part of) the microscopic dWBC by a flow cytometric dWBC, that gives additional information on blasts, myeloid precursors, and lymphocyte subsets. We designed a cocktail of antibodies (CD4, CD14, CD34, CD16, CD56, CD19, CD45, CD138, CD3, and CD71) combined with a gating strategy and flow cytometric protocol for easy identification of leukocyte populations. This assay, called Leukoflow, requires low sample volume, has few manual handling steps, and a potential turn-around-time shorter than 2 h. We determine percentages and absolute concentrations of at least 13 different cell populations. For quantification of normoblasts a second flow cytometric staining was designed. We compared microscopic dWBC with that of the automated blood counter and Leukoflow for normal and abnormal blood samples. Leukoflow results correlate well with the automated blood counter for leukocytes, neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes, and lymphocytes. Correlation with manual dWBC is lower. Blast counts reported by Leukoflow suffer less from inter-observer variation compared to manual dWBC. In addition to microscopic or cytometric dWBC-techniques T-lymphocytes, CD4-T-lymphocytes, B-lymphocytes, NK-cells, myeloid progenitors, plasma cells, and blasts are determined by Leukoflow. These populations give potential useful clinical information and are subject for future studies focusing on the additional clinical value. Leukoflow is a highly interesting and promising technique for clinical laboratories.
白细胞分类计数(dWBC)是一种常用的诊断工具。对于大多数患者样本,自动化血液计数器会生成五分类白细胞分类计数。如果这个 dWBC 不符合预设标准,就需要进行显微镜下白细胞分类计数。显微镜检查需要大量的劳动力,并且需要对技术人员进行持续的培训。由于计数的细胞数量有限,因此存在观察者间差异和统计差异。流式细胞术是 dWBC 的候选参考方法。其优点是具有免疫学定义和大量测量的细胞。我们的目标是用流式细胞术 dWBC 替代(部分)显微镜下白细胞分类计数,从而提供有关原始细胞、髓系前体细胞和淋巴细胞亚群的额外信息。我们设计了一种抗体鸡尾酒(CD4、CD14、CD34、CD16、CD56、CD19、CD45、CD138、CD3 和 CD71),结合门控策略和流式细胞术方案,易于识别白细胞群体。该检测方法称为 Leukoflow,需要的样本量少,手动操作步骤少,潜在的周转时间短于 2 小时。我们可以确定至少 13 种不同细胞群的百分比和绝对浓度。为了定量检测网织红细胞,我们设计了第二种流式细胞术染色。我们将显微镜下白细胞分类计数与自动化血液计数器和 Leukoflow 进行比较,用于正常和异常血液样本。Leukoflow 与自动化血液计数器的白细胞、中性粒细胞、嗜酸性粒细胞、单核细胞和淋巴细胞相关性良好。与手动白细胞分类计数的相关性较低。与手动白细胞分类计数相比,Leukoflow 报告的原始细胞计数受观察者间差异的影响较小。除了显微镜或细胞术白细胞分类计数技术外,Leukoflow 还可以测定 T 淋巴细胞、CD4-T 淋巴细胞、B 淋巴细胞、NK 细胞、髓系祖细胞、浆细胞和原始细胞。这些群体提供了潜在有用的临床信息,是未来关注额外临床价值的研究的主题。Leukoflow 是一种非常有意义和有前途的临床实验室技术。