Musialik-Swietlińska Ewa, Bober Klaudiusz, Swietliński Janusz, Górny Janusz, Krawczyk Robert, Owsianka-Podleśny Teresa
Klinika Intensywnej Terapii i Patologii Noworodka, SUM w Katowicach p.o. Kierownika, Górnoslaskie Centrum Zdrowia Dziecka, Katowice.
Med Wieku Rozwoj. 2011 Jan-Mar;15(1):84-90.
Interhospital transfer of the sick neonate should be an integral part of neonatal intensive care. However, it is essential that the referring hospital is able to provide the appropriate standard of care from birth up to the point of transfer.
To evaluate the quality of medical interventions before interhospital transport of sick neonates.
Retrospective study based on review of all transport records of530 neonates who were transported at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) in 2006. The examined variables included medical interventions in the maternity unit and transport team interventions before and during the transport.
During the study period there was as a total of 530 transfers to Neonatology Departments, 325 of them (61.32%) were transferred to the NICU and 205 (38.68%) to the Special Care Unit. Within the group of neonates transported to the NICU, 51 (15.7%) infants had hypothermia, 65 (20%) had no venous access before the transport. The most common form of respiratory therapy was oxygen therapy (89 (27.4%) neonates), followed by mechanical ventilation (65 (20%) and NCPAP ventilation (50 (15.4%) infants). As a result of transport team interventions the number of children with hypothermia decreased to 27 (8.3%). Peripheral intravenous devices were inserted in 52 (16%) neonates. The number of infants transported on mechanical ventilation increased to 115 (35.4%), 56 (17.2%) babies received NCPAP and 53 (16.3%) were on supplemental oxygen. The highest number of transport team interventions was found in the group of extremely low birth weight infants.
Inadequate medical preparation of sick neonates in maternity hospital for interhospital transport was the reason for the high incidence of transport team interventions before moving the neonate to the NICU.
患病新生儿的院际转运应是新生儿重症监护的一个组成部分。然而,转诊医院必须能够从出生到转运时提供适当的护理标准。
评估患病新生儿院际转运前的医疗干预质量。
基于对2006年在新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)转运的530例新生儿所有转运记录的回顾进行回顾性研究。检查的变量包括产科病房的医疗干预以及转运团队在转运前和转运期间的干预。
在研究期间,共有530例新生儿被转至新生儿科,其中325例(61.32%)被转至NICU,205例(38.68%)被转至特殊护理病房。在转至NICU的新生儿组中,51例(15.7%)婴儿体温过低,65例(20%)在转运前没有静脉通路。最常见的呼吸治疗形式是氧疗(89例(27.4%)新生儿),其次是机械通气(65例(20%))和鼻塞持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)(50例(15.4%)婴儿)。由于转运团队的干预,体温过低的儿童数量降至27例(8.3%)。52例(16%)新生儿插入了外周静脉装置。机械通气下转运的婴儿数量增加到115例(35.4%),56例(17.2%)婴儿接受NCPAP治疗,53例(16.3%)接受补充氧气治疗。极低出生体重婴儿组的转运团队干预次数最多。
产科医院患病新生儿在院际转运前医疗准备不足,是新生儿转至NICU前转运团队干预发生率高的原因。