McNamara P J, Mak W, Whyte H E
Acute Care Transport Services, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Perinatol. 2005 May;25(5):309-14. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211263.
Morbidity related to ineffective resuscitation and stabilization of premature infants is increased when delivery occurs outside tertiary perinatal centers. The regional neonatal transport team received extensive training to expand their scope of practice to include delivery room resuscitation allowing them to attend high-risk deliveries in community hospitals when maternal transfer was not possible.
Compare the resuscitation and stabilization of premature infants when a specialized neonatal retrieval team (SNRT) is in attendance at delivery with immediate resuscitation and stabilization performed by the referral hospital team (RHT).
We assessed the impact of a specially trained neonatal transport team by comparing the initial resuscitation process, airway and vascular access skills, illness severity and patient stabilization in both groups.
Neonates resuscitated by the RHT were more likely to receive oxygen, mask CPAP, bag and mask ventilation and cardiac compressions for a significantly longer time period. Neonates resuscitated by the SNRT were intubated more promptly (8.5 minutes {1 to 22} vs 16 minutes {1 to 90}, p=0.035) following a fewer number of attempts. The endotracheal tube was correctly positioned on radiological assessment in 72% of cases in the SNRT group vs 38.1% in the RHT group (p<0.001). Many neonates had no vascular access (31%) and were profoundly hypothermic (38.5%) on arrival of the SNRT. Although there was no significant difference in maximum FiO(2) or oxygenation index, babies with respiratory distress syndrome resuscitated by the RHT were less likely to receive surfactant therapy (76.6 vs 34.4%, p=0.001). There was no difference in transport-related mortality between the groups
The presence of a highly skilled transport team at a high-risk preterm delivery improves the quality of neonatal resuscitation by increasing intubation success rates and achieving earlier vascular access. Neonates resuscitated by dedicated neonatal retrieval teams were less likely to become significantly hypothermic. Although the severity of RDS was similar neonates in the RHT were less likely to receive surfactant.
当分娩在三级围产期中心以外的地方进行时,与早产儿复苏和稳定无效相关的发病率会增加。区域新生儿转运团队接受了广泛培训,以扩大其业务范围,包括产房复苏,使他们能够在无法进行产妇转运时参与社区医院的高危分娩。
比较专业新生儿转运团队(SNRT)在分娩时在场进行复苏和稳定与转诊医院团队(RHT)立即进行复苏和稳定时早产儿的复苏和稳定情况。
我们通过比较两组的初始复苏过程、气道和血管通路技能、疾病严重程度和患者稳定情况,评估了经过专门培训的新生儿转运团队的影响。
由RHT复苏的新生儿更有可能接受氧气、面罩持续气道正压通气(CPAP)、气囊面罩通气和心脏按压,且时间显著更长。由SNRT复苏的新生儿在尝试次数较少的情况下更迅速地进行了气管插管(8.5分钟{1至22}对16分钟{1至90},p = 0.035)。在SNRT组中,72%的病例经放射学评估气管插管位置正确,而在RHT组中为38.1%(p < 0.001)。许多新生儿在SNRT到达时没有血管通路(31%)且体温过低(38.5%)。尽管最大吸入氧浓度(FiO₂)或氧合指数没有显著差异,但由RHT复苏的呼吸窘迫综合征婴儿接受表面活性剂治疗的可能性较小(76.6%对34.4%,p = 0.001)。两组之间与转运相关的死亡率没有差异。
在高危早产分娩时有一支技术熟练的转运团队在场,可通过提高气管插管成功率和更早实现血管通路来提高新生儿复苏质量。由专门的新生儿转运团队复苏的新生儿体温显著过低的可能性较小。尽管呼吸窘迫综合征的严重程度相似,但RHT组的新生儿接受表面活性剂治疗的可能性较小。