• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较三个规模类别威斯康星州奶牛场的牛奶大容量培养平板计数和体细胞计数。

Comparison of bulk-tank standard plate count and somatic cell count for Wisconsin dairy farms in three size categories.

机构信息

University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Food Science, 1605 Linden Drive, Madison, USA.

出版信息

J Dairy Sci. 2011 Aug;94(8):4237-41. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4310.

DOI:10.3168/jds.2011-4310
PMID:21787961
Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate possible claims by advocates of small-scale dairy farming that milk from smaller Wisconsin farms is of higher quality than milk from larger Wisconsin farms. Reported bulk tank standard plate count (SPC) and somatic cell count (SCC) test results for Wisconsin dairy farms were obtained for February to December, 2008. Farms were sorted into 3 size categories using available size-tracking criteria: small (≤118 cows; 12,866 farms), large (119-713 cattle; 1,565 farms), and confined animal feeding operations (≥714 cattle; 160 farms). Group means were calculated (group=farm size category) for the farms' minimum, median, mean, 90th percentile, and maximum SPC and SCC. Statistical analysis showed that group means for median, mean, 90th percentile, and maximum SPC and SCC were almost always significantly higher for the small farm category than for the large farm and confined animal feeding operations farm categories. With SPC and SCC as quality criteria and the 3 farm size categories of ≤118, 119 to 713, and ≥714 cattle, the claim of Wisconsin smaller farms producing higher quality milk than Wisconsin larger farms cannot be supported.

摘要

本研究旨在评估小型奶牛场倡导者提出的以下主张是否合理

威斯康星州较小规模农场生产的牛奶比大规模农场的牛奶质量更高。报告了威斯康星州奶牛场 2008 年 2 月至 12 月的散装奶罐标准平板计数(SPC)和体细胞计数(SCC)测试结果。根据现有的规模跟踪标准,将农场分为 3 个规模类别:小(≤118 头牛;12866 个农场)、大(119-713 头;1565 个农场)和封闭动物饲养场(≥714 头;160 个农场)。计算了各农场的最低值、中位数、平均值、第 90 个百分位数和最大值 SPC 和 SCC 的组平均值(组=农场规模类别)。统计分析表明,中位数、平均值、第 90 个百分位数和最大值 SPC 和 SCC 的组平均值对于小型农场类别几乎总是显著高于大型农场和封闭动物饲养场类别。如果以 SPC 和 SCC 作为质量标准,且将威斯康星州的农场规模分为≤118 头、119-713 头和≥714 头这 3 个类别,那么威斯康星州较小规模农场生产的牛奶质量比大规模农场更高的说法是站不住脚的。

相似文献

1
Comparison of bulk-tank standard plate count and somatic cell count for Wisconsin dairy farms in three size categories.比较三个规模类别威斯康星州奶牛场的牛奶大容量培养平板计数和体细胞计数。
J Dairy Sci. 2011 Aug;94(8):4237-41. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4310.
2
Short communication: Correlation of on-site inspection and laboratory milk testing results for Wisconsin grade A dairy farms in 2007 and 2008.简短交流:2007 年和 2008 年威斯康星州 A 级奶牛场现场检查和实验室牛奶检测结果的相关性。
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Sep;93(9):3957-60. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2913.
3
Predicting somatic cell count standard violations based on herd's bulk tank somatic cell count. Part II: Consistency index.基于牛群奶罐体细胞计数预测体细胞计数标准违规情况。第二部分:一致性指数。
J Dairy Sci. 2008 Jan;91(1):433-41. doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0648.
4
Correlation between standard plate count and somatic cell count milk quality results for Wisconsin dairy producers.威斯康星州奶农的标准平板计数与体细胞计数牛奶质量结果之间的相关性。
J Dairy Sci. 2014 May;97(5):2646-52. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7784. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
5
Process audits versus product quality monitoring of bulk milk.批量牛奶的过程审核与产品质量监测。
J Dairy Sci. 2011 Jan;94(1):235-49. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-3528.
6
Management of Wisconsin dairy herds enrolled in milk quality teams.参与牛奶质量团队的威斯康星州奶牛场管理
J Dairy Sci. 2005 Jul;88(7):2660-71. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72943-X.
7
Associations of risk factors with somatic cell count in bulk tank milk on organic and conventional dairy farms in the United States.美国有机和常规奶牛场牛奶体细胞计数与风险因素的关联。
J Dairy Sci. 2013 Jun;96(6):3689-702. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-6271. Epub 2013 Mar 30.
8
Effects of season, milking routine and cow cleanliness on bacterial and somatic cell counts of bulk tank milk.季节、挤奶程序和奶牛清洁度对牛奶罐中牛奶的细菌和体细胞计数的影响。
J Dairy Res. 2011 Nov;78(4):436-41. doi: 10.1017/S0022029911000598. Epub 2011 Aug 16.
9
Limitations of on-site dairy farm regulatory debits as milk quality predictors.作为牛奶质量预测指标的现场奶牛场监管扣分的局限性。
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Mar;98(3):1526-38. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8756. Epub 2015 Jan 15.
10
Short communication: Evaluation of bulk tank milk microbiological quality of nine dairy farms in Tennessee.短讯:田纳西州 9 家奶牛场牛奶大容量储存罐微生物质量评估。
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Aug;95(8):4275-9. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4881.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations between on-farm factors and bulk tank SCC on Irish dairy farms.爱尔兰奶牛场的农场因素与奶罐体细胞计数之间的关联。
Ir Vet J. 2025 Jul 7;78(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13620-025-00300-8.