Peer review: "a critique of the critics".
作者信息
Andersson Karl-Erik
出版信息
J Urol. 2011 Sep;186(3):777-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.07.038. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
PMID:21788036
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Peer review: "a critique of the critics".同行评审：“对批评者的批评”
J Urol. 2011 Sep;186(3):777-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.07.038. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
2
Lessons drawn from the critique of the Hissom closure evaluation.从对希索姆关闭评估的批判中吸取的教训。
Ment Retard. 2006 Oct;44(5):372-5. doi: 10.1352/0047-6765(2006)44[372:LDFTCO]2.0.CO;2.
3
Critics blast 'premature' paper on adult stem cells.批评者抨击关于成体干细胞的“不成熟”论文。
Nature. 2004 Jun 10;429(6992):590. doi: 10.1038/429590b.
4
Paranoid about peer review?担心同行评审？
Nature. 1996 Dec 12;384(6609):509. doi: 10.1038/384509a0.
5
Integrity of the peer review process.
Can J Cardiol. 2000 Jun;16(6):814.
6
Ensuring the quality of peer-review process.确保同行评审过程的质量。
Saudi Med J. 2006 Aug;27(8):1253.
7
Journals submit to scrutiny of their peer-review process.期刊要接受同行评审过程的审查。
Nature. 2006 Jan 19;439(7074):252. doi: 10.1038/439252b.
8
Journals: how to decide what's worth publishing.期刊：如何判断哪些内容值得发表。
Nature. 2003 Jan 16;421(6920):209-10. doi: 10.1038/421209b.
9
Readers' and author's responses to "are traditional peer-reviewed medical articles obsolete?".
MedGenMed. 2006;8(1):70; author reply 70.
10
Peer review.同行评审
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003 Dec;126(6):1681-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.07.015.
Zotero 插件