Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106, USA.
J Urol. 2011 Sep;186(3):844-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.04.078. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
We describe findings from a Urological Surgery Quality Collaborative project focused on improving the use of radiographic staging in men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer.
From May 2009 through September 2010 Urological Surgery Quality Collaborative surgeons collected uniform data for men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. During this period we implemented 3 phases of data collection. Unlike the baseline phase, the second and third rounds were preceded by collaborative quality improvement interventions, including comparative performance feedback, and review and dissemination of clinical guidelines. We evaluated the use of bone scans and computerized tomography across prostate cancer risk strata, Urological Surgery Quality Collaborative practice locations, and before and after quality improvement interventions.
We collected data for 858 men with prostate cancer. Based on the D'Amico classification 44%, 39% and 17% of the men had low, intermediate and high risk cancer, respectively. Overall 25% and 22% of patients underwent staging with a bone scan or computerized tomography, respectively, ordered by a Urological Surgery Quality Collaborative urologist. Urological Surgery Quality Collaborative practices differed significantly in their baseline use of bone scans and computerized tomography for men with low and intermediate risk cancer (p<0.01). Compared with baseline practice patterns (31% bone scans, 28% computerized tomography), urologists in Urological Surgery Quality Collaborative practices ordered fewer bone and computerized tomography scans in post-intervention phases 2 (23%, 21%) and 3 (16%, 13%) of data collection (p<0.01), including a significant reduction in the use of these studies in patients with low and intermediate risk cancer (p<0.05).
Following collaborative feedback on baseline use and review of clinical guidelines, urologists in Urological Surgery Quality Collaborative practices dramatically reduced variations in practice patterns and improved adherence with recommended staging practices.
我们描述了一项泌尿外科手术质量协作项目的研究结果,该项目专注于改善新诊断前列腺癌患者的影像学分期应用。
从 2009 年 5 月至 2010 年 9 月,泌尿外科手术质量协作医师收集了新诊断前列腺癌男性患者的统一数据。在此期间,我们实施了三个阶段的数据收集。与基线阶段不同,第二轮和第三轮数据收集之前分别进行了协作质量改进干预,包括比较绩效反馈以及临床指南的审查和传播。我们评估了在前列腺癌风险分层、泌尿外科手术质量协作实践地点以及质量改进干预前后骨扫描和计算机断层扫描的应用。
我们收集了 858 例前列腺癌患者的数据。根据 D'Amico 分类,44%、39%和 17%的患者分别患有低危、中危和高危癌症。总体而言,分别有 25%和 22%的患者由泌尿外科手术质量协作医师进行了骨扫描和计算机断层扫描分期。在低危和中危癌症患者中,泌尿外科手术质量协作实践在基线阶段的骨扫描和计算机断层扫描应用上存在显著差异(p<0.01)。与基线实践模式(31%的骨扫描,28%的计算机断层扫描)相比,泌尿外科手术质量协作实践中的医师在干预后阶段 2(23%,21%)和 3(16%,13%)的数据收集阶段中减少了骨扫描和计算机断层扫描的数量(p<0.01),包括在低危和中危癌症患者中显著减少了这些检查的应用(p<0.05)。
在对基线使用情况进行协作反馈并审查临床指南后,泌尿外科手术质量协作实践中的医师显著减少了实践模式的差异,并提高了对推荐分期实践的依从性。