Departamento de Biología Vegetal y Ecología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.
Oecologia. 2012 Jan;168(1):153-65. doi: 10.1007/s00442-011-2084-z. Epub 2011 Jul 26.
It is widely recognized that pollinators vary in their effectiveness in pollination mutualisms, due both to differences in flower-pollinator morphological fit as well as pollinator behaviour. However, pollination webs typically treat all interactions as equal, and we contend that this method may provide misleading results. Using empirical and theoretical data, we present the case study of a self-incompatible herb in which the number of flowers visited by a pollinator cannot be used as a surrogate for the total effect of a pollinator on a plant due to differences in per-visit effectiveness at producing seeds. In self-incompatible species, the relationship between interaction frequency and per-interaction effect may become increasingly negative as more flowers per plant are visited due to geitonogamous pollen transfer. We found that pollinators making longer bouts (i.e. visiting more flowers per plant visit) had an overall higher pollination success per bout. However, per-interaction effects tended to decrease as the bout progressed, particularly for pollinators that cause higher pollen deposition. Since the same interaction frequency may result from different combinations of number of bouts (plant visits) and bout length (flowers visited/bout), pollinators making repeatedly shorter bouts may contribute more to plant reproduction for the same number of flowers visited. Consequently, the magnitude of the differences in number of interactions of different insect types may be overridden by the magnitude of the differences in effectiveness as pollinators, even if the same pollinators consistently interact more frequently. We discuss two predictions regarding the validity of using interaction frequency as a surrogate for plant seed production (as a measure of total effect), depending on the degree of self-compatibility, plant size and floral display. We suggest that the role of interaction frequency must be tested for different species, environments, and across wider scales to validate its use as a surrogate for total effect in plant-pollinator networks.
人们普遍认识到,传粉者在传粉互惠关系中的有效性存在差异,这既归因于花-传粉者形态适配的差异,也归因于传粉者行为的差异。然而,传粉网络通常将所有相互作用视为等同的,我们认为这种方法可能会提供误导性的结果。本文使用经验和理论数据,以一种自交不亲和的草本植物为例,提出了一种情况,即由于每次访问产生种子的效率差异,传粉者访问的花朵数量不能作为传粉者对植物总效应的替代。在自交不亲和的物种中,由于每个植株上访问的花朵数量增加,更多的自花授粉花粉转移导致了互作频率与每次互作效应之间的关系可能变得越来越负。我们发现,传粉者的单次访问(即每次访问访问的花朵数量)时间越长,每次访问的整体授粉成功率越高。然而,随着访问的进行,每次互作的效果往往会下降,特别是对于那些导致花粉沉积较高的传粉者。由于相同的互作频率可能来自于单次访问(植株访问)的数量和单次访问(访问的花朵数量)的长度的不同组合,因此,多次访问的传粉者可能会为相同数量的花朵访问做出更多的贡献,从而促进植物繁殖。因此,即使相同的传粉者持续更频繁地相互作用,不同昆虫类型的互作次数的差异幅度也可能被传粉者作为传粉者的有效性的差异幅度所掩盖。我们根据自交程度、植株大小和花部展示讨论了使用互作频率作为植物种子生产(作为总效应的度量)替代指标的两个预测,取决于不同物种、环境和更广泛的尺度。我们建议,必须根据不同的物种、环境和更广泛的尺度来检验互作频率的作用,以验证其在植物-传粉者网络中作为总效应替代指标的有效性。