AZ Center for Bone & Joint Disorders, 2122 E Highland Ave, Ste 300, Phoenix, AZ, 85016, USA,
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2011 Sep;4(3):146-50. doi: 10.1007/s12178-011-9090-y.
Because of the extensile nature and familiarity of the standard posterior-lateral approach to the hip, a family of "micro-posterior" approaches has been developed. This family includes the Percutaneously-Assisted Total Hip (PATH) approach, the Supercapsular (SuperCap) approach and a newer hybrid approach, the Supercapsular Percutaneously-Assisted Total Hip (SuperPATH) approach. Such approaches should ideally provide a continuum for the surgeon: from a "micro" (external rotator sparing) posterior approach, to a "mini" (external rotator sacrificing) posterior approach, to a standard posterior approach. This could keep a surgeon within his comfort zone during the learning curve of the procedure, while leaving options for complicated reconstructions for the more practiced micro-posterior surgeons. This paper details one author's experiences utilizing this combined approach, as well as permutations of this entire micro-posterior family of approaches as applied to more complex hip reconstructions.
由于标准的髋关节后外侧入路具有广泛的适用性和熟悉度,因此开发了一系列“微创后侧”入路。这个系列包括经皮辅助全髋关节置换术(PATH)入路、关节囊外(SuperCap)入路和一种较新的混合入路,即关节囊外经皮辅助全髋关节置换术(SuperPATH)入路。这些入路理想情况下应为外科医生提供一个连续的选择:从“微创”(保留外旋肌)后侧入路,到“迷你”(牺牲外旋肌)后侧入路,再到标准后侧入路。这可以使外科医生在手术学习曲线期间保持在舒适区内,同时为更有经验的微创后侧外科医生提供复杂重建的选择。本文详细介绍了一位作者在更复杂的髋关节重建中使用这种联合入路的经验,以及整个微创后侧入路系列的各种变化。