Suppr超能文献

提出一种评估类风湿关节炎的区域性方法和一种新的结局测量方法。

Proposing a method of regional assessment and a novel outcome measure in rheumatoid arthritis.

机构信息

Rheumatic Disease Center, Kurashiki Medical Center, Kurashiki, Japan.

出版信息

Rheumatol Int. 2012 Aug;32(8):2569-71. doi: 10.1007/s00296-011-2058-9. Epub 2011 Jul 26.

Abstract

We proposed a method of regional assessment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The utility of this method was demonstrated by assessing drug efficacy in patients who received infliximab (n = 31) or tocilizumab (n = 6). Joints were divided into four regions: upper/large, upper/small, lower/large, and lower/small. The total joint index was calculated as follows: the sum of tender and swollen joint counts divided by the number of evaluable joints in each region. At the baseline, the total joint index of the upper/small region was the lowest and that of the lower/large region was the highest compared with other regions. The change in the total joint index from the baseline to the 30-week point (Δ) did not differ among the four regions. There were significant close relations of Δ between the upper/small and the upper/large region and between the lower/small and the lower/large region. This method allows us to focus on a specific region and to compare and contrast among them.

摘要

我们提出了一种针对类风湿关节炎患者的区域性评估方法。通过评估接受英夫利昔单抗(n = 31)或托珠单抗(n = 6)治疗的患者的药物疗效,证明了该方法的实用性。关节分为四个区域:大/上肢、大/小上肢、大/下肢和小/下肢。总关节指数的计算方法如下:压痛和肿胀关节数的总和除以每个区域可评估关节的数量。在基线时,与其他区域相比,小/上肢区域的总关节指数最低,大/下肢区域的总关节指数最高。从基线到 30 周点的总关节指数变化(Δ)在四个区域之间没有差异。小/上肢和大/上肢区域以及小/下肢和大/下肢区域之间的Δ具有显著的密切关系。这种方法使我们能够专注于特定区域,并对它们进行比较和对比。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验