• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

压缩负载和温度对牙胶和 Resilon®热机械测试的影响。

Effect of compression load and temperature on thermomechanical tests for gutta-percha and Resilon®.

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Araraquara Dental School, São Paulo State University - UNESP, Araraquara, Brazil.

出版信息

Int Endod J. 2011 Nov;44(11):1019-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01910.x. Epub 2011 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01910.x
PMID:21790663
Abstract

AIM

To analyse a method used to evaluate the thermomechanical properties of gutta-percha and Resilon(®) at different temperatures and compression loads.

METHODOLOGY

Two hundred and seventy specimens measuring 10 mm in diameter and 1.5 mm in height were made from the following materials: conventional gutta-percha (GCO), thermoplastic gutta-percha (GTP) and Resilon(®) cones (RE). After 24 h, the specimens were placed in water at 50 °C, 60 °C or 70 °C for 60 s. After that, specimens were placed between two glass slabs, and loads weighing 1.0, 3.0 or 5.0 kg were applied. Images of the specimens were digitized before and after the test and analysed using imaging software to determine their initial and final areas. The thermomechanical property of each material was determined by the difference between the initial and final areas of the specimens. Data were subjected to anova and SNK tests at 5% significance. To verify a possible correlation between the results of the materials, linear regression coefficients (r) were calculated.

RESULTS

Data showed higher flow area values for RE under all compression loads at 70 °C and under the 5.0 kg load at 60 °C (P < 0.05). Regarding gutta-percha, GTP showed higher flow under loads weighing 3.0 and 5.0 kg, at 60 and 70 °C (P < 0.05). GCO presented higher flow at 70 °C with a load of 5.0 kg. Regression analyses showed a poor linear correlation amongst the results of the materials under the different experimental conditions.

CONCLUSION

Gutta-percha and Resilon(®) cones require different compression loads and temperatures for evaluation of their thermomechanical properties. For all materials, the greatest flow occurred at 70 °C under a load of 5.0 kg; therefore, these parameters may be adopted when evaluating endodontic filling materials.

摘要

目的

分析一种用于评估不同温度和压缩负载下牙胶和 Resilon®(瑞特)热机械性能的方法。

方法

从以下材料中制备 270 个直径为 10mm、高度为 1.5mm 的样本:传统牙胶(GCO)、热塑牙胶(GTP)和 Resilon®(RE)牙胶尖。24 小时后,将样本在 50°C、60°C 或 70°C 的水中放置 60 秒。之后,将样本放置在两块玻璃板之间,并施加 1.0、3.0 或 5.0kg 的负载。测试前后对样本进行数字化成像,并使用成像软件分析以确定其初始和最终面积。通过样本初始和最终面积的差异确定每种材料的热机械性能。数据采用方差分析和 SNK 检验进行 5%显著水平的分析。为了验证材料结果之间可能存在的相关性,计算了线性回归系数(r)。

结果

数据显示,在所有压缩负载下,RE 在 70°C 时和在 60°C 时 5.0kg 负载下的流动面积值更高(P<0.05)。关于牙胶,GTP 在 60°C 和 70°C 时,在 3.0kg 和 5.0kg 负载下的流动率更高(P<0.05)。GCO 在 70°C 时,在 5.0kg 负载下的流动率更高。回归分析显示,在不同实验条件下,材料的结果之间线性相关性较差。

结论

牙胶和 Resilon®(瑞特)牙胶尖需要不同的压缩负载和温度来评估其热机械性能。对于所有材料,在 5.0kg 负载下 70°C 时的流动率最大;因此,在评估根管充填材料时可以采用这些参数。

相似文献

1
Effect of compression load and temperature on thermomechanical tests for gutta-percha and Resilon®.压缩负载和温度对牙胶和 Resilon®热机械测试的影响。
Int Endod J. 2011 Nov;44(11):1019-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01910.x. Epub 2011 Jul 26.
2
Evaluation of the thermoplasticity of different gutta-percha cones and Resilon.不同牙胶尖和Resilon热塑性的评估。
Aust Endod J. 2007 Apr;33(1):23-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4477.2007.00063.x.
3
Evaluation of the thermoplasticity of gutta-percha and Resilon® using the Obtura II System at different temperature settings.评价不同温度设置下使用 Obtura II 系统的牙胶和 Resilon®的热塑性。
Int Endod J. 2011 Aug;44(8):764-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01889.x. Epub 2011 Apr 25.
4
Push-out bond strengths: the Epiphany-Resilon endodontic obturation system compared with different pairings of Epiphany, Resilon, AH Plus and gutta-percha.推出粘结强度:Epiphany-Resilon根管充填系统与Epiphany、Resilon、AH Plus和牙胶不同组合的比较。
Int Endod J. 2006 Aug;39(8):643-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01132.x.
5
Temperature changes in gutta-percha and Resilon cones induced by a thermomechanical compaction technique.热机械压实技术引起的牙胶尖和Resilon根管充填尖的温度变化
J Endod. 2009 Jun;35(6):879-82. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.03.009. Epub 2009 Apr 19.
6
An ex vivo comparison of three different gutta-percha cones when compacted at different temperatures: rheological considerations in relation to the filling of lateral canals.三种不同牙胶尖在不同温度下压实时的体外比较:与侧支根管充填相关的流变学考量
Int Endod J. 2006 Aug;39(8):648-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01133.x.
7
Efficacy of three different rotary files to remove gutta-percha and Resilon from root canals.三种不同旋转锉去除根管内牙胶和 Resilon 的效果比较。
Int Endod J. 2010 Nov;43(11):1022-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01758.x. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
8
Long-term sealing ability of Resilon apical root-end fillings.Resilon根尖根充材料的长期封闭能力。
Int Endod J. 2009 Oct;42(10):884-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01583.x.
9
A comparison of cohesive strength and stiffness of Resilon and gutta-percha.Resilon与牙胶的粘结强度和刚度比较。
J Endod. 2006 Jun;32(6):553-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.08.002. Epub 2006 Apr 4.
10
Fracture resistance of roots filled with gutta-percha or RealSeal®.根充后牙体抗折性能的比较。
Int Endod J. 2011 Nov;44(11):1005-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01908.x. Epub 2011 Sep 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Obturation Techniques on the Quality of Root Canal Fillings: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Studies.根管充填技术对根管充填质量的影响:一项系统评价与研究的Meta分析
Iran Endod J. 2024;19(2):61-74. doi: 10.22037/iej.v19i2.40210.
2
Effect of Distinctive Moisture Conditions on Push-out Bond Strength of Three Root Canal Sealers-An Study.不同湿度条件对三种根管封闭剂推出粘结强度的影响——一项研究
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2019 Sep 30;9(5):492-498. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_240_19. eCollection 2019 Sep-Oct.
3
Accuracy of Gypsum Casts after Different Impression Techniques and Double Pouring.
不同印模技术和二次灌注后石膏模型的准确性
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 13;11(10):e0164825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164825. eCollection 2016.