Suppr超能文献

吸入丙酸倍氯米松的全身作用:容量贮雾器的双盲比较。

Systemic activity of inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate: a double-blind comparison of volume spacers.

机构信息

Children's Clinic Randers, Denmark.

出版信息

Acta Paediatr. 2012 Feb;101(2):159-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2011.02430.x. Epub 2011 Aug 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To which extent volume spacers may influence systemic activity of inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) has not been evaluated.

AIM

To assess whether the AeroChamber Plus™ spacer is equivalent to the Volumatic™ spacer for administration of inhaled hydroflouroalkane 134a propelled BDP in terms of lower leg growth rate (LLGR).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Prepubertal children with mild asthma (n = 26, aged 6-14 years) were included in a 3-time periods of 2 weeks duration randomized double-blind cross-over study with a single-blind placebo run-in and two washout periods. LLGR was measured with the knemometer. Interventions were inhaled BDP hydroflouroalkane 134a pressurized metered dose inhaler 100 μg and 200 μg b.i.d. with the AeroChamber Plus and 200 μg b.i.d. with the Volumatic spacer.

RESULTS

Beclomethasone dipropionate 200 μg b.i.d. from the AeroChamber Plus was non-inferior to BDP 200 b.i.d. from the Volumatic spacer as the lower margin of confidence interval of the difference between treatments (-0.18 to 0.13 mm/week) was greater than the prespecified lower limit for non-inferiority (-0.20 mm/week). UFC/creatinine data showed no statistically significant variations.

CONCLUSION

The systemic activity of BDP, via the Volumatic™, and AeroChamber Plus™ spacers is similar. The AeroChamber Plus spacer may be used in children without risk of increasing systemic activity of BDP.

摘要

背景

体积扩张器对吸入用丙酸倍氯米松(BDP)全身作用的影响程度尚未得到评估。

目的

评估在下肢生长速率(LLGR)方面,AeroChamber Plus™ 储雾罐与 Volumatic™ 储雾罐在吸入用氢氟烷烃 134a 推进的 BDP 给药方面是否等效。

患者和方法

将轻度哮喘的青春期前儿童(n=26,年龄 6-14 岁)纳入一项为期 3 个 2 周周期的随机双盲交叉研究,其中包括单盲安慰剂导入期和两个洗脱期。采用量角器测量 LLGR。干预措施为吸入用氢氟烷烃 134a 加压计量吸入器 100 μg 和 200 μg,每日 2 次,分别使用 AeroChamber Plus 和 Volumatic 储雾罐。

结果

AeroChamber Plus 中每日 2 次的 BDP 200 μg 与 Volumatic 储雾罐中每日 2 次的 BDP 200 μg 相比是非劣效的,因为治疗之间差异的置信区间下限(-0.18 至 0.13 mm/周)大于预设的非劣效性下限(-0.20 mm/周)。UFC/肌酐数据未显示出统计学上的显著变化。

结论

通过 Volumatic™ 和 AeroChamber Plus™ 储雾罐,BDP 的全身作用相似。AeroChamber Plus 储雾罐可在儿童中使用,而不会增加 BDP 的全身作用风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验