Department of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Fl 33612 USA.
Haematologica. 2011 Nov;96(11):1678-84. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2011.049841. Epub 2011 Jul 26.
The 2005 National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on chronic graft-versus-host disease proposed major changes in the classification and grading of severity of chronic graft-versus-host disease.
We aimed to study the association of the proposed chronic graft-versus-host disease classification and global severity with transplantation outcomes among a consecutive series of patients who received pharmacokinetically-targeted doses of intravenous busulfan and fludarabine conditioning followed by transplantation of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cells.
From a total cohort (n = 242) of patients surviving more than 100 days after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, 181 (75% of those at risk) had some manifestations of graft-versus-host disease after day 100. Of these, at onset 13 (7%) had late acute graft-versus-host disease, 62 (34%) had classic chronic graft-versus-host disease, and 106 (59%) had the overlap subtype of chronic graft-versus-host disease. The global severity of the chronic graft-versus-host disease was mild in 25% of cases, moderate in 46%, and severe in 29%. Multivariable modeling demonstrated the independent association of global severity of chronic graft-versus-host disease with overall survival (moderate/severe versus mild; HR 2.9, 95% CI 1.8-4.7, P < 0.0001) and non-relapse mortality (moderate versus mild; HR 3.86, 95% CI 1.17-12.73, P = 0.03, and severe versus mild (HR 10.06, 95% CI 3.07-32.97, P < 0.001). The type of onset of progressive chronic graft-versus-host disease and the platelet count at the time of diagnosis of the disease were significantly associated with overall survival. The occurrence and severity of chronic graft-versus-host disease was also significantly associated with primary disease relapse.
Patients with moderate to severe chronic graft-versus-host disease, as determined by National Institutes of Health Consensus criteria, have an inferior overall survival and worse non-relapse mortality. Clinical and research advances are needed to improve the outcomes of affected patients.
2005 年美国国立卫生研究院共识发展会议提出了慢性移植物抗宿主病分类和严重程度分级的重大变化。
我们旨在研究在接受药代动力学靶向剂量静脉注射白消安和氟达拉滨预处理后,接受同种异体外周血干细胞移植的连续患者系列中,提出的慢性移植物抗宿主病分类和整体严重程度与移植结局的相关性。
在造血干细胞移植后存活超过 100 天的患者总队列(n=242)中,有 181 例(有风险的患者的 75%)在 100 天后出现了一些移植物抗宿主病的表现。其中,13 例(7%)在发病时出现迟发性急性移植物抗宿主病,62 例(34%)出现经典慢性移植物抗宿主病,106 例(59%)出现慢性移植物抗宿主病重叠亚型。慢性移植物抗宿主病的整体严重程度为轻度占 25%,中度占 46%,重度占 29%。多变量模型显示慢性移植物抗宿主病整体严重程度与总生存(中度/重度与轻度;HR 2.9,95%CI 1.8-4.7,P<0.0001)和非复发死亡率(中度与轻度;HR 3.86,95%CI 1.17-12.73,P=0.03,以及重度与轻度(HR 10.06,95%CI 3.07-32.97,P<0.001)显著相关。进行性慢性移植物抗宿主病的发病类型和疾病诊断时的血小板计数与总生存显著相关。慢性移植物抗宿主病的发生和严重程度也与原发性疾病复发显著相关。
根据美国国立卫生研究院共识标准,患有中重度慢性移植物抗宿主病的患者总生存较差,非复发死亡率较高。需要临床和研究进展来改善受影响患者的结局。