• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

艰难梭菌感染“干预”:毒素检测结果的改变导致艰难梭菌感染病例减少,而患者结局无变化。

A Clostridium difficile infection "intervention": change in toxin assay results in fewer C difficile infection cases without changes in patient outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

Am J Infect Control. 2012 May;40(4):349-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.04.002. Epub 2011 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajic.2011.04.002
PMID:21794950
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4156412/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is most commonly diagnosed using toxin enzyme immunoassays (EIAs). A sudden decrease in CDI incidence was noted after a change in the EIA used at Barnes-Jewish Hospital in St Louis. The objective of this study was to determine whether the decreased CDI incidence related to the change in EIA resulted in adverse patient outcomes.

METHODS

Electronic hospital databases were used to collect data on demographics, outcomes, and treatment of inpatients who had a C difficile toxin assay performed between January 4, 2009, and April 3, 2009 (period A, preassay change) and between May 21, 2009, and August 17, 2009 (period B, postassay change).

RESULTS

Assays were positive in 240 of 1,221 patients (19.7%) during period A and in 106 of 1160 patients (9.1%) during period B (P < .01). There was no difference in mortality or discharge to hospice between the 2 periods (10.3% vs 10.1%; P = .90). Patients tested in period B were less likely to receive metronidazole or oral vancomycin (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

The new EIA resulted in fewer positive tests and reduced anti-CDI therapy. There was no difference in mortality between the 2 periods, suggesting that the decreased incidence was due to increased assay specificity, not decreased sensitivity.

摘要

背景

艰难梭菌感染(CDI)最常通过毒素酶免疫分析(EIA)进行诊断。在圣路易斯巴恩斯-犹太医院改变 EIA 后,注意到 CDI 的发病率突然下降。本研究的目的是确定 EIA 改变与 CDI 发病率下降是否与患者不良预后有关。

方法

使用电子医院数据库收集 2009 年 1 月 4 日至 4 月 3 日(检测前改变期,A 期)和 2009 年 5 月 21 日至 8 月 17 日(检测后改变期,B 期)期间接受艰难梭菌毒素检测的住院患者的人口统计学、结局和治疗数据。

结果

A 期有 1221 例患者中有 240 例(19.7%)检测结果阳性,B 期有 1160 例患者中有 106 例(9.1%)检测结果阳性(P<0.01)。两个时期的死亡率或临终关怀出院率没有差异(10.3% vs 10.1%;P=0.90)。B 期接受检测的患者接受甲硝唑或口服万古霉素治疗的可能性较低(P<0.01)。

结论

新的 EIA 导致阳性检测结果减少和抗 CDI 治疗减少。两个时期的死亡率没有差异,这表明发病率下降是由于检测特异性增加,而不是敏感性降低。

相似文献

1
A Clostridium difficile infection "intervention": change in toxin assay results in fewer C difficile infection cases without changes in patient outcomes.艰难梭菌感染“干预”:毒素检测结果的改变导致艰难梭菌感染病例减少,而患者结局无变化。
Am J Infect Control. 2012 May;40(4):349-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.04.002. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
2
Performance of Clostridium difficile toxin enzyme immunoassay and nucleic acid amplification tests stratified by patient disease severity.按患者疾病严重程度分层的艰难梭菌毒素酶免疫分析和核酸扩增检测的性能。
J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Mar;51(3):869-73. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02970-12. Epub 2012 Dec 26.
3
Clinical outcomes and treatment necessity in patients with toxin-negative Clostridioides difficile stool samples.无毒素艰难梭菌粪便样本患者的临床结局和治疗必要性。
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2024 Apr 25;23(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12941-024-00696-1.
4
Clostridium difficile colonization among patients with clinically significant diarrhea and no identifiable cause of diarrhea.艰难梭菌定植于具有临床显著腹泻且无明确腹泻病因的患者中。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018 Nov;39(11):1330-1333. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.225. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
5
Clinical Significance of Toxigenic Clostridioides difficile Growth in Stool Cultures during the Era of Nonculture Methods for the Diagnosis of C. difficile Infection.非培养方法诊断艰难梭菌感染时代粪便培养中产毒艰难梭菌生长的临床意义。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Oct 31;9(2):e0079921. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00799-21. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
6
The Clinical and Laboratory Impact of Upgrading Clostridioides (formerly Clostridium) difficile Infection Testing from Routine to Molecular Based-Algorithm: an Observational Case-Study from the Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.将艰难梭菌感染检测从常规方法升级为基于分子的算法的临床和实验室影响:来自沙特阿拉伯东部省的一项观察性病例研究。 (注:Clostridioides difficile是艰难梭菌的新属名,原文中括号内的formerly Clostridium表示以前的梭菌属)
Clin Lab. 2019 Aug 1;65(8). doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2019.181252.
7
Incidence, epidemiology and control of infection in a tertiary care private hospital in India.印度一家三级私立医院感染的发病率、流行病学及控制情况
Indian J Med Microbiol. 2018 Jul-Sep;36(3):381-384. doi: 10.4103/ijmm.IJMM_18_340.
8
Predictors of Clostridioides difficile Infection-Related Complications and Treatment Patterns among Nucleic Acid Amplification Test-Positive/Toxin Enzyme Immunoassay-Negative Patients.核酸扩增试验阳性/毒素酶免疫测定阴性患者中艰难梭菌感染相关并发症及治疗模式的预测因素。
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Feb 24;58(3). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01764-19.
9
Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of Clostridium difficile infection in a Korean tertiary hospital.韩国一家三级医院艰难梭菌感染的流行病学和临床特征。
J Korean Med Sci. 2011 Oct;26(10):1258-64. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2011.26.10.1258. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
10
Toxin Enzyme Immunoassays Detect Clostridioides difficile Infection With Greater Severity and Higher Recurrence Rates.毒素酶免疫测定法检测艰难梭菌感染的严重程度更高,复发率更高。
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Oct 30;69(10):1667-1674. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz009.

引用本文的文献

1
Global burden of infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.全球 感染负担:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Glob Health. 2019 Jun;9(1):010407. doi: 10.7189/jogh.09.010407.
2
Rapid detection of Clostridium difficile toxins and laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infections.艰难梭菌毒素的快速检测及艰难梭菌感染的实验室诊断
Infection. 2017 Jun;45(3):255-262. doi: 10.1007/s15010-016-0940-9. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
3
Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: an ongoing conundrum for clinicians and for clinical laboratories.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of hospital-acquired Clostridium difficile infection on in-hospital mortality.医院获得性艰难梭菌感染对住院死亡率的影响。
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Nov 8;170(20):1804-10. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.405.
2
Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults: 2010 update by the society for healthcare epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the infectious diseases society of America (IDSA).艰难梭菌感染临床实践指南:美国医疗保健流行病学学会(SHEA)和美国传染病学会(IDSA)2010 年更新版。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 May;31(5):431-55. doi: 10.1086/651706.
3
Clostridium difficile infection in Ohio hospitals and nursing homes during 2006.
艰难梭菌感染的诊断:临床医生和临床实验室面临的持续难题。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013 Jul;26(3):604-30. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00016-13.
4
Impact of clinical symptoms on interpretation of diagnostic assays for Clostridium difficile infections.临床症状对艰难梭菌感染诊断检测结果解读的影响。
J Clin Microbiol. 2011 Aug;49(8):2887-93. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00891-11. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
2006年俄亥俄州医院和疗养院中的艰难梭菌感染
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009 Jun;30(6):526-33. doi: 10.1086/597507.
4
Review of current literature on the economic burden of Clostridium difficile infection.艰难梭菌感染经济负担的当前文献综述。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009 Jan;30(1):57-66. doi: 10.1086/592981.
5
Asymptomatic carriers are a potential source for transmission of epidemic and nonepidemic Clostridium difficile strains among long-term care facility residents.无症状携带者是长期护理机构居民中流行和非流行艰难梭菌菌株传播的潜在来源。
Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Oct 15;45(8):992-8. doi: 10.1086/521854. Epub 2007 Sep 4.
6
Hospitals to report C. difficile and MRSA.医院需报告艰难梭菌和耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染情况。
CMAJ. 2007 May 8;176(10):1402-3. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.070507.
7
An epidemic, toxin gene-variant strain of Clostridium difficile.一种艰难梭菌的流行、毒素基因变异菌株。
N Engl J Med. 2005 Dec 8;353(23):2433-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa051590. Epub 2005 Dec 1.
8
Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea: a plea for culture.艰难梭菌相关性腹泻的实验室诊断:呼吁进行培养
J Med Microbiol. 2005 Feb;54(Pt 2):187-191. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.45844-0.
9
Do physicians examine patients in contact isolation less frequently? A brief report.医生对处于接触隔离状态的患者进行检查的频率是否较低?一篇简短报告。
Am J Infect Control. 2003 Oct;31(6):354-6. doi: 10.1016/s0196-6553(02)48250-8.
10
Safety of patients isolated for infection control.因感染控制而被隔离的患者的安全。
JAMA. 2003 Oct 8;290(14):1899-905. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.14.1899.