• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

MRI 诊断与临床检查对盆腔器官脱垂的比较。

MRI diagnosis of pelvic organ prolapse compared with clinical examination.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.

出版信息

Acad Radiol. 2011 Oct;18(10):1245-51. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.05.010. Epub 2011 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2011.05.010
PMID:21795069
Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to determine agreement between clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (rectal contrast and noncontrast MRI) for pelvic organ prolapse using both the pubococcygeal line (PCL) and the midpubic line (MPL) and to assess the relationship between measurements performed relative to each line.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Dynamic MRI exams in 88 women (with rectal contrast, n = 39; noncontrast, n = 49) were evaluated, followed by review of clinical exam notes. Agreement between clinical exam and MRI and the difference between PCL and MPL measurements were evaluated.

RESULTS

Agreement of rectal contrast MRI with clinical exam was 79% for PCL and 85% for MPL (P = .17) for cystoceles, 50% for PCL and 59% for MPL (P = .20) for vaginal prolapse, 56% for PCL for enteroceles, and 61% for rectoceles. Agreement of noncontrast MRI with clinical exam was 67% for PCL and 78% for MPL (P = .19) for cystoceles, 58% for PCL and 71% for MPL (P = .10) for vaginal prolapse, 65% for enteroceles, and 40% for rectoceles. The average difference between the PCL and the MPL was 3.12 ± 0.24 cm at the bladder base and 4.88 ± 0.37 cm at the vaginal apex.

CONCLUSIONS

Agreement of MRI with clinical exam was highest for cystoceles. There was no significant difference in agreement using the MPL or PCL, suggesting that either line can be used on MRI. The average differences between the PCL and MPL at the bladder base and vaginal apex were approximately 3 and 5 cm, respectively.

摘要

背景和目的

本研究旨在通过会阴肛提肌线(PCL)和耻骨中点线(MPL)比较临床检查和磁共振成像(MRI)(直肠对比和非对比 MRI)在盆腔器官脱垂中的诊断一致性,并评估两种方法之间的相关性。

材料和方法

对 88 名女性(直肠对比 MRI 39 例,非对比 MRI 49 例)进行动态 MRI 检查,然后回顾临床检查记录。评估临床检查和 MRI 之间的一致性以及 PCL 和 MPL 测量值之间的差异。

结果

直肠对比 MRI 与临床检查在膀胱膨出方面的一致性为 PCL 为 79%,MPL 为 85%(P=.17);阴道膨出方面为 PCL 为 50%,MPL 为 59%(P=.20);肠膨出方面为 PCL 为 56%,MPL 为 61%;直肠膨出方面为 PCL 为 67%,MPL 为 78%。非对比 MRI 与临床检查在膀胱膨出方面的一致性为 PCL 为 67%,MPL 为 78%(P=.19);阴道膨出方面为 PCL 为 58%,MPL 为 71%(P=.10);肠膨出方面为 PCL 为 65%,MPL 为 40%;直肠膨出方面为 PCL 为 40%,MPL 为 71%。PCL 和 MPL 在膀胱底的平均差值为 3.12±0.24cm,在阴道顶点的平均差值为 4.88±0.37cm。

结论

MRI 与临床检查在膀胱膨出方面的一致性最高。使用 MPL 或 PCL 时,其一致性没有显著差异,这表明两种方法都可以在 MRI 上使用。PCL 和 MPL 在膀胱底和阴道顶点的平均差值分别约为 3cm 和 5cm。

相似文献

1
MRI diagnosis of pelvic organ prolapse compared with clinical examination.MRI 诊断与临床检查对盆腔器官脱垂的比较。
Acad Radiol. 2011 Oct;18(10):1245-51. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.05.010. Epub 2011 Jul 26.
2
Comparison of supine magnetic resonance imaging with and without rectal contrast to fluoroscopic cystocolpoproctography for the diagnosis of pelvic organ prolapse.仰卧位磁共振成像在有和没有直肠造影剂情况下与荧光透视下膀胱阴道直肠造影术用于诊断盆腔器官脱垂的比较。
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2009 Jan-Feb;33(1):125-30. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e318161d739.
3
Prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse detected at dynamic MRI in women without history of pelvic floor dysfunction: comparison of two reference lines.在没有盆底功能障碍病史的女性中,动态 MRI 检测到的盆腔器官脱垂的患病率:两条参考线的比较。
Clin Radiol. 2014 Feb;69(2):e71-7. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2013.09.015. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
4
MRI findings before and after prolapse surgery.脱垂手术前后的磁共振成像(MRI)检查结果
Acta Radiol. 2014 May;55(4):495-504. doi: 10.1177/0284185113497201. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
5
Dynamic half Fourier acquisition, single shot turbo spin-echo magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating the female pelvis.动态半傅里叶采集单次激发快速自旋回波磁共振成像在女性盆腔评估中的应用
J Urol. 2000 Nov;164(5):1606-13.
6
Study of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of pelvic organ prolapse.盆腔器官脱垂的动态磁共振成像研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Oct;286(4):953-8. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2381-8. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
7
Prevalence of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging-identified pelvic organ prolapse in pre- and postmenopausal women without clinically evident pelvic organ descent.在无临床明显盆腔脏器脱垂的绝经前和绝经后女性中,动态磁共振成像识别出的盆腔器官脱垂患病率。
Acta Radiol. 2016 Nov;57(11):1418-1424. doi: 10.1177/0284185115589123. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
8
Assessment of pelvic organ descent by use of functional cine-MRI: which reference line should be used?使用功能性电影磁共振成像评估盆腔器官脱垂:应使用哪条参考线?
Neurourol Urodyn. 2004;23(1):33-7. doi: 10.1002/nau.10170.
9
Magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate anterior pelvic prolapse: H line is the key.磁共振成像评估前盆腔脱垂:H 线是关键。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2021 Apr;40(4):1042-1047. doi: 10.1002/nau.24665. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
10
MRI of pelvic floor dysfunction: dynamic true fast imaging with steady-state precession versus HASTE.盆底功能障碍的磁共振成像:稳态进动快速成像与半傅里叶采集单次激发快速自旋回波序列的比较
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Aug;191(2):352-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.3403.

引用本文的文献

1
International Urogynecological Consultation Chapter 2.2: Imaging in the Diagnosis of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.国际妇科学咨询第2.2章:盆腔器官脱垂诊断中的影像学检查
Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Apr;36(4):759-781. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05948-4. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
2
Assessment of pelvic organ prolapse with the Pelvic Inclination Correction System: defining the normal range and threshold to pathology.使用骨盆倾斜矫正系统评估盆腔器官脱垂:定义正常范围和病理阈值。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024 Jun;49(6):1996-2007. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04222-x. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
3
Comparison of Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Defecography With Clinical Examination in Diagnosing Pelvic Floor Dysfunction: An Observational Study.
动态磁共振排粪造影与临床检查在诊断盆底功能障碍中的比较:一项观察性研究。
Cureus. 2023 Dec 31;15(12):e51378. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51378. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
Pubococcygeal Line Versus H-line as MR Defecography Reference for Bladder Descent.肛提肌耻骨直肠肌连线与 H 线在 MRI 排粪造影中评估膀胱下降的对比研究
Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Mar;35(3):537-544. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05707-x. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
5
International Urogynecological Consultation: clinical definition of pelvic organ prolapse.国际尿妇科咨询:盆腔器官脱垂的临床定义。
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Aug;32(8):2011-2019. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04875-y. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
6
Defining mechanisms of recurrence following apical prolapse repair based on imaging criteria.基于影像学标准定义前位阴道壁脱垂修补术后复发的机制。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Nov;225(5):506.e1-506.e28. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.05.041. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
7
Pelvic floor dysfunctions: how to image patients?盆腔功能障碍:如何为患者成像?
Jpn J Radiol. 2020 Jan;38(1):47-63. doi: 10.1007/s11604-019-00903-6. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
8
Relevance of open magnetic resonance imaging position (sitting and standing) to quantify pelvic organ prolapse in women.开放式磁共振成像体位(坐姿和站姿)对量化女性盆腔器官脱垂的相关性。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2018 Nov;12(11):E453-E460. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.5186. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
9
Magnetic resonance defecography versus clinical examination and fluoroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.磁共振排粪造影与临床检查和透视比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2017 Dec;21(12):915-927. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1704-y. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
10
Quantitative assessment of new MRI-based measurements to differentiate low and high stages of pelvic organ prolapse using support vector machines.使用支持向量机对基于磁共振成像的新测量方法进行定量评估,以区分盆腔器官脱垂的低阶段和高阶段。
Int Urogynecol J. 2015 May;26(5):707-13. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2582-8. Epub 2014 Nov 28.