• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

院前简化运动评分与院前格拉斯哥昏迷评分同样准确:全州创伤登记处的分析。

The prehospital simplified motor score is as accurate as the prehospital Glasgow coma scale: analysis of a statewide trauma registry.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2012 Jun;29(6):492-6. doi: 10.1136/emj.2010.110437. Epub 2011 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1136/emj.2010.110437
PMID:21795294
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The simplified motor score (SMS) is a three-point measure of traumatic brain injury (TBI) severity, which is easier to calculate than the 15-point Glasgow coma scale (GCS). Using a state trauma registry, the accuracy of the emergency medical services (EMS)-obtained SMS was compared with the GCS for predicting neurological outcomes and mortality.

METHODS

A retrospective, observational analysis was performed of patients aged 16 years and older in the 2002-7 Ohio Trauma Registry. Those not initially transported by EMS or with incomplete EMS GCS scores were excluded. Outcomes included inhospital mortality, TBI, neurosurgical intervention, any emergency intubation and emergency department intubation. Discriminatory ability was compared using area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUC). Sensitivity and specificity for each outcome were calculated at a SMS cutoff of one or less (any abnormal SMS) and a GCS cutoff of 13 or less.

RESULTS

52,412 patients were identified. Sensitivity, specificity and AUC were similar between the SMS and GCS for all outcomes. Sensitivity for mortality was 72.2% for SMS and 74.6% for GCS. Sensitivity for TBI was 40.8% for SMS and 45.4% for GCS. Sensitivity for neurosurgical intervention was 52.9% for SMS and 60.0% for GCS. Sensitivity for any intubation was 72.7% for SMS and 75.5% for GCS. Specificity was less than 2% different for all outcomes. Discriminatory ability was similar with the difference in AUC between SMS and GCS no greater than 6% for any outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

In a state trauma registry including both trauma and non-trauma centres, the EMS-obtained SMS performs as well as the 15-point GCS.

摘要

目的

简化运动评分(SMS)是一种三点法评估创伤性脑损伤(TBI)严重程度的指标,其计算难度低于 15 分的格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)。利用州创伤登记处,比较了急救医疗服务(EMS)获得的 SMS 与 GCS 在预测神经结局和死亡率方面的准确性。

方法

对 2002-2007 年俄亥俄州创伤登记处年龄在 16 岁及以上的患者进行回顾性、观察性分析。排除最初未由 EMS 转运或 EMS GCS 评分不完整的患者。结局包括院内死亡率、TBI、神经外科干预、任何急诊插管和急诊部插管。使用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)比较判别能力。计算 SMS 截点为 1 或更低(任何异常 SMS)和 GCS 截点为 13 或更低时每个结局的敏感性和特异性。

结果

共确定了 52412 例患者。SMS 和 GCS 在所有结局中的敏感性、特异性和 AUC 相似。SMS 对死亡率的敏感性为 72.2%,GCS 为 74.6%。SMS 对 TBI 的敏感性为 40.8%,GCS 为 45.4%。SMS 对神经外科干预的敏感性为 52.9%,GCS 为 60.0%。SMS 对任何插管的敏感性为 72.7%,GCS 为 75.5%。所有结局的特异性差异小于 2%。AUC 之间的差异小于 6%,提示判别能力相似。

结论

在包括创伤和非创伤中心的州创伤登记处中,EMS 获得的 SMS 与 15 分的 GCS 表现相当。

相似文献

1
The prehospital simplified motor score is as accurate as the prehospital Glasgow coma scale: analysis of a statewide trauma registry.院前简化运动评分与院前格拉斯哥昏迷评分同样准确:全州创伤登记处的分析。
Emerg Med J. 2012 Jun;29(6):492-6. doi: 10.1136/emj.2010.110437. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
2
Modification of Glasgow Coma Scale criteria for injured elders.修订格拉斯哥昏迷评分标准用于评估老年伤者。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Oct;18(10):1014-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01164.x. Epub 2011 Sep 26.
3
Validation of the Simplified Motor Score for the prediction of brain injury outcomes after trauma.简化运动评分对创伤后脑损伤结局预测的验证
Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Jul;50(1):18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.10.004. Epub 2006 Nov 16.
4
Validation of the Simplified Motor Score in the out-of-hospital setting for the prediction of outcomes after traumatic brain injury.验证简化运动评分在创伤性脑损伤后院外环境中的预测结果。
Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Nov;58(5):417-25. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.05.033. Epub 2011 Jul 30.
5
A comparison of five simplified scales to the out-of-hospital Glasgow Coma Scale for the prediction of traumatic brain injury outcomes.五种简化量表与院外格拉斯哥昏迷量表在预测创伤性脑损伤结局方面的比较。
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Sep;13(9):968-73. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.05.019. Epub 2006 Aug 7.
6
A comparison of the prehospital motor component of the Glasgow coma scale (mGCS) to the prehospital total GCS (tGCS) as a prehospital risk adjustment measure for trauma patients.院前格拉斯哥昏迷量表(mGCS)的运动成分与院前总格拉斯哥昏迷量表(tGCS)的比较,作为创伤患者的院前风险调整措施。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014 Jan-Mar;18(1):68-75. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2013.844870.
7
A comparison of the Glasgow Coma Scale score to simplified alternative scores for the prediction of traumatic brain injury outcomes.格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分与简化替代评分在预测创伤性脑损伤结局方面的比较。
Ann Emerg Med. 2005 Jan;45(1):37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.07.429.
8
The predictive value of field versus arrival Glasgow Coma Scale score and TRISS calculations in moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.现场与入院时格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分及创伤和损伤严重度评分计算在中重度创伤性脑损伤中的预测价值。
J Trauma. 2006 May;60(5):985-90. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000205860.96209.1c.
9
The association between field Glasgow Coma Scale score and outcome in patients undergoing paramedic rapid sequence intubation.接受护理人员快速顺序插管患者的现场格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分与预后的关系。
J Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;29(4):391-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2005.04.012.
10
Performance of the pediatric glasgow coma scale in children with blunt head trauma.小儿格拉斯哥昏迷量表在钝性头部创伤患儿中的应用
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Sep;12(9):814-9. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.04.019.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Glasgow coma scale, motor component, eye component, and simplified motor scale for predicting trauma outcomes: a 13-year multicenter retrospective cohort study.格拉斯哥昏迷量表、运动部分、眼部部分及简化运动量表对创伤预后预测的比较:一项为期13年的多中心回顾性队列研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2025 May 30;25(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01246-4.
2
Reverse shock index multiplied by simplified motor score as an indicator of clinical outcomes in patients with abdominal trauma in the emergency department: a retrospective cohort study.急诊腹部创伤患者中反向休克指数乘以简化运动评分作为临床结局指标的回顾性队列研究
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2025 Apr;31(4):332-340. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2025.23798.
3
Combination of reverse shock index and simplified motor score as a strong discriminator of trauma outcomes.
反向休克指数与简化运动评分相结合作为创伤结局的有力判别指标。
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2458205. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2458205. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
4
Reverse shock index multiplied by simplified motor score as a predictor of clinical outcomes for patients with COVID-19.反向休克指数乘以简化运动评分,可预测 COVID-19 患者的临床结局。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Feb 14;24(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-00948-5.
5
Identification of a neurologic scale that optimizes EMS detection of older adult traumatic brain injury patients who require transport to a trauma center.确定一种神经学量表,以优化紧急医疗服务(EMS)对需要转运至创伤中心的老年创伤性脑损伤患者的检测。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2015 Apr-Jun;19(2):202-12. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2014.959225. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
6
Evidence-based improvement of the National Trauma Triage Protocol: The Glasgow Coma Scale versus Glasgow Coma Scale motor subscale.基于证据的国家创伤分诊协议改进:格拉斯哥昏迷评分与格拉斯哥昏迷评分运动子量表。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Jul;77(1):95-102; discussion 101-2. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000280.
7
Pre-hospital and initial management of head injury patients: An update.头部损伤患者的院前及初始处理:最新进展
Saudi J Anaesth. 2014 Jan;8(1):114-20. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.125971.