Arlin Z, Case D C, Moore J, Wiernik P, Feldman E, Saletan S, Desai P, Sia L, Cartwright K
Department of Medicine, New York Medical College, Valhalla 10595.
Leukemia. 1990 Mar;4(3):177-83.
This phase III, randomized trial in previously untreated adults with ANLL compared mitoxantrone plus cytosine arabinoside with the CALGB "7 + 3" daunorubicin-based regimen. Two hundred evaluable patients (98 treated with the mitoxantrone-based regimen and 102 with the daunorubicin-based regimen) were included in the analysis of efficacy. The median age of the patients was 60 years. The induction regimen comprised cytosine arabinoside 100 mg/m2 by infusion daily for 7 days and mitoxantrone 12 mg/m2 or daunorubicin 45 mg/m2 daily for days 1-3. If needed, a second induction course was administered: cytosine arabinoside for 5 days and mitoxantrone or daunorubicin for 2 days. Postremission therapy consisted of two consolidation courses, identical to the second induction course. Sixty-three percent (62 of 98) of patients treated with mitoxantrone achieved complete remission (CR), compared to 53% (54 of 102) treated with daunorubicin. The median time to CR was 35 days in patients treated with mitoxantrone and 43 days for those treated with daunorubicin. Eighty-nine percent (55 of 62) of patients treated with mitoxantrone who entered complete remission achieved CR following one induction course, compared to 68% (37 of 54) of patients treated with daunorubicin who entered CR. The median duration of CR was 240 days in patients treated with mitoxantrone and 198 days in those treated with daunorubicin; the median length of survival was 328 days in patients who received mitoxantrone and 247 days in those who received daunorubicin. The toxicity profiles in patients treated with either of the two regimens were comparable in incidence and in severity. Patients treated with mitoxantrone required fewer median platelet units and were treated with fewer median days of intravenous antibiotics, compared to those who received daunorubicin. Mitoxantrone in combination with cytosine arabinoside is effective in previously untreated ANLL. complete remissions occur more frequently after a single induction course of the mitoxantrone-based regimen, compared to the standard Cancer and Acute Leukemia Group B regimen. This should be explored in further trials.
这项针对既往未经治疗的急性非淋巴细胞白血病(ANLL)成年患者的III期随机试验,比较了米托蒽醌加阿糖胞苷与癌症和白血病B组(CALGB)基于柔红霉素的“7 + 3”方案。200例可评估患者(98例接受基于米托蒽醌的方案治疗,102例接受基于柔红霉素的方案治疗)纳入疗效分析。患者的中位年龄为60岁。诱导方案包括阿糖胞苷100 mg/m²,每日静脉输注,共7天,米托蒽醌12 mg/m²或柔红霉素45 mg/m²,在第1 - 3天每日使用。如有需要,给予第二个诱导疗程:阿糖胞苷使用5天,米托蒽醌或柔红霉素使用2天。缓解后治疗包括两个巩固疗程,与第二个诱导疗程相同。接受米托蒽醌治疗的患者中有63%(98例中的62例)达到完全缓解(CR),而接受柔红霉素治疗的患者为53%(102例中的54例)。接受米托蒽醌治疗的患者达到CR的中位时间为35天,接受柔红霉素治疗的患者为43天。进入完全缓解的接受米托蒽醌治疗的患者中有89%(62例中的55例)在一个诱导疗程后达到CR,而进入CR的接受柔红霉素治疗的患者为68%(54例中的37例)。接受米托蒽醌治疗的患者CR的中位持续时间为240天,接受柔红霉素治疗的患者为198天;接受米托蒽醌治疗的患者中位生存时长为328天,接受柔红霉素治疗的患者为247天。两种方案治疗的患者毒性反应在发生率和严重程度上相当。与接受柔红霉素治疗的患者相比,接受米托蒽醌治疗的患者所需的中位血小板单位更少,静脉使用抗生素的中位天数也更少。米托蒽醌联合阿糖胞苷对既往未经治疗的ANLL有效。与标准的癌症和急性白血病B组方案相比,基于米托蒽醌的方案单次诱导疗程后完全缓解更频繁出现。这一点应在进一步试验中探索。