Center for Human Genetics, Biomedical Quality Assurance Research Unit, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.
Hum Mutat. 2011 Nov;32(11):1197-203. doi: 10.1002/humu.21569. Epub 2011 Aug 17.
Currently, two nomenclature systems are in use to describe sequence variants for cystic fibrosis: the established traditional nomenclature system and the more recent Human Genome Variation Society (HGVS) nomenclature system. We have evaluated the use of both systems in the laboratory reports of 217 participants in the cystic fibrosis external quality assessment scheme of 2009. The mutation c.1521_1523delCTT (p.Phe508del, F508del) was described by traditional and HGVS nomenclature by 32 of 216 (15%) laboratories that correctly identified the mutation, whereas 171 (79%) laboratories used traditional nomenclature only and 13 (6%) laboratories used HGVS nomenclature only. Overall, 29 of 631 (5%) reports used nomenclature that was evaluated as being seriously incorrect and/or misleading and 136 (22%) reports contained attempts at HGVS coding, of which 104 (76%) contained no coding errors; just 33 (24%) mentioned the correct cDNA name and cited the nucleotide reference sequence. We recognized an urgent need for more consistent and correct usage of nomenclature. We recommended that cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator testing reports should include a description of the identified sequence variants in both HGVS and traditional nomenclature and provided basic recommendations and other guidance.
目前,有两种命名系统用于描述囊性纤维化的序列变异:已建立的传统命名系统和最近的人类基因组变异学会(HGVS)命名系统。我们评估了这两种系统在 2009 年囊性纤维化外部质量评估计划的 217 名参与者的实验室报告中的使用情况。突变 c.1521_1523delCTT(p.Phe508del, F508del)被 32 个(15%)正确识别突变的 216 个实验室中的 32 个实验室用传统命名法和 HGVS 命名法描述,而 171 个(79%)实验室仅使用传统命名法,13 个(6%)实验室仅使用 HGVS 命名法。总的来说,在 631 份报告中有 29 份(5%)被评估为严重不正确和/或具有误导性的命名报告,136 份(22%)报告中包含对 HGVS 编码的尝试,其中 104 份(76%)没有编码错误;只有 33 份(24%)提到了正确的 cDNA 名称,并引用了核苷酸参考序列。我们认识到迫切需要更一致和正确地使用命名法。我们建议囊性纤维化跨膜电导调节因子检测报告应同时包含 HGVS 和传统命名法对鉴定的序列变异的描述,并提供了基本建议和其他指导。