Dequeker E, Cassiman J J
Center for Human Genetics, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium.
Eur J Hum Genet. 1998 Mar-Apr;6(2):165-75. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200195.
Within the framework of the European Concerted Action on Cystic Fibrosis (Biomed-2, BMH4-CT96-0462) a quality assessment was set up for 135 European and one Australian laboratory. Six DNA samples were sent to the various laboratories. These samples carried the following CFTR genotypes: dF508/N1303K; dI507/wild; dF508/G551D; dF508/621 + 1 GtoT; R553X/wild and 1717-1 GtoA/wild. Each laboratory was asked to process the samples as they routinely do, whether they checked for all mutations or not. More than 75% of the laboratories screened for at least six of these mutations. Heteroduplex analysis was the most frequently used primary testing method (47%), in many instances followed by restriction enzyme digestion. Only a minority of the laboratories made use of a commercial CFTR mutation detection kit. On average, 91% of the laboratories correctly typed both alleles of a given DNA sample. However, 35% of the laboratories incorrectly typed one or more alleles from a total of 12 alleles included in the trial. One laboratory even failed to identify four of the different alleles correctly. The genotyping error frequency tended to be lower in laboratories which perform more than 200 CFTR mutation analyses per year. The results of this quality control trial suggest that there are many laboratories (35%) which have a percentage of errors unacceptable in a routine testing setting. The development of a consensus testing strategy for routine diagnostic laboratories and centralised mutation analysis facilities for rare or country-specific mutations in a limited number of expert centres, in combination with regular training sessions and quality assessments, should further improve genotyping.
在欧洲囊性纤维化联合行动(Biomed-2,BMH4-CT96-0462)框架内,对135个欧洲实验室和1个澳大利亚实验室进行了质量评估。六个DNA样本被送往各个实验室。这些样本携带以下CFTR基因型:dF508/N1303K;dI507/野生型;dF508/G551D;dF/508/621+1G→T;R553X/野生型和1717-1G→A/野生型。要求每个实验室按照其常规操作流程处理样本,无论是否检测所有突变。超过75%的实验室筛查了这些突变中的至少六种。异源双链分析是最常用的初筛方法(47%),在许多情况下其次是限制性酶切。只有少数实验室使用了商业CFTR突变检测试剂盒。平均而言,91%的实验室能够正确分型给定DNA样本的两个等位基因。然而,35%的实验室在试验中包含的总共12个等位基因中错误分型了一个或多个等位基因。甚至有一个实验室未能正确识别四种不同的等位基因。每年进行超过200次CFTR突变分析的实验室,其基因分型错误频率往往较低。这项质量控制试验的结果表明,有许多实验室(35%)在常规检测环境中的错误率是不可接受的。为常规诊断实验室制定共识检测策略,以及在少数专家中心为罕见或特定国家的突变建立集中式突变分析设施,并结合定期培训课程和质量评估,应能进一步改善基因分型。