Suppr超能文献

经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)治疗原发性痛经:与安慰剂TENS和布洛芬的随机交叉比较

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea: a randomized crossover comparison with placebo TENS and ibuprofen.

作者信息

Dawood M Y, Ramos J

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Apr;75(4):656-60.

PMID:2179780
Abstract

In a randomized four-way crossover study, 32 women with primary dysmenorrhea were treated with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for two cycles, placebo (sham) TENS for one cycle, or ibuprofen 400 mg four times a day for one cycle. The TENS setting used was 100 pulses per second with 100-microsecond pulse widths. The subjects were allowed to adjust the amplitude to a comfortable level. The pain rescue medication was ibuprofen 400 mg as needed, up to 1600 mg/day. Significantly more subjects who had TENS treatment did not require rescue medication or required less backup ibuprofen at 0-4, 4-8, and 8-12 hours after the onset of dysmenorrhea and starting treatment, as well as during the first 24 hours and for the duration of the menstrual flow, when compared with placebo TENS or ibuprofen-treated cycles (Tukey multiple comparison, P less than .01). Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation significantly delayed the need for ibuprofen by an average of 5.9 hours, compared with 0.7 hours when using ibuprofen alone (P less than .05, paired t test). Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation alone provided good to excellent subjective pain relief in 42.4% of subjects, compared with 3.2% with placebo TENS, and significantly reduced diarrhea, menstrual flow, clot formation, and fatigue compared with placebo TENS. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation plus less ibuprofen provided pain relief equivalent to that obtained with ibuprofen alone (71 and 75% of the subjects, respectively). We conclude that TENS is a safe, effective, non-medication method for managing primary dysmenorrhea and that TENS plus ibuprofen was the best overall treatment, as indicated by pain relief.

摘要

在一项随机四向交叉研究中,32名原发性痛经女性接受了两个周期的经皮电神经刺激(TENS)治疗、一个周期的安慰剂(假)TENS治疗或每天4次、每次400毫克布洛芬治疗一个周期。所使用的TENS设置为每秒100个脉冲,脉冲宽度为100微秒。受试者可将振幅调节至舒适水平。疼痛缓解药物为按需服用的400毫克布洛芬,每日剂量最高可达1600毫克。与安慰剂TENS或布洛芬治疗周期相比,接受TENS治疗的受试者在痛经发作并开始治疗后的0至4小时、4至8小时和8至12小时,以及在月经开始的头24小时和整个经期中,显著更少需要缓解疼痛药物或需要更少的备用布洛芬(Tukey多重比较,P小于0.01)。与单独使用布洛芬时平均延迟0.7小时相比,经皮电神经刺激显著延迟了布洛芬的使用需求,平均延迟5.9小时(P小于0.05,配对t检验)。单独使用经皮电神经刺激在42.4%的受试者中提供了良好至极佳的主观疼痛缓解,而安慰剂TENS组为3.2%,与安慰剂TENS相比,经皮电神经刺激显著减轻了腹泻、月经量、血块形成和疲劳。经皮电神经刺激加用较少剂量的布洛芬提供的疼痛缓解与单独使用布洛芬相当(分别为71%和75%的受试者)。我们得出结论,TENS是一种安全、有效的非药物治疗原发性痛经的方法,且如疼痛缓解情况所示,TENS加布洛芬是总体最佳治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验