IBYME-CONICET, Vuelta de Obligado 2490, 1428 Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Vet Parasitol. 2011 Dec 29;183(1-2):174-7. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.06.027. Epub 2011 Jul 8.
Development of resistance to anthelmintic drugs has motivated the search for diagnostic methods to identify animals for targeted selective treatments. We compared three methods for the diagnosis of nematode infection in relation to milk production in a fully grazing dairy herd of 150 cows in the humid Pampa (Argentina). Animals had feces, blood and milk sampled during the first postpartum month for EPG, pepsinogen and anti-Ostertagia antibody determination, respectively. With the results obtained two groups of cows, divided in high and low parasite burden, were conformed for each method, and milk production was then compared between groups. When cows were separated by the EPG method (EPG=0 (N=106) vs. EPG>0 (N=44)) a difference of nearly 800 l of milk per cow per lactation was found (P<0.05). On the other hand, milk production between groups separated by Pepsinogen (mUtyr ≤ 1000 vs. mUtyr > 1000) or by anti-Ostertagia (ODR ≤ 0.5 vs. ODR > 0.5) results did not differ. Interestingly, proportion of cows in each group differed between methods (P<0.0001), and the anti-Ostertagia method yielded significantly more cows in the high index group compared to results using the EPG or Pepsinogen method. No correlations were found between parasite indexes determined by the different methods. High parasite burden estimation found may be ascribed to the production system, fully grazing all year round, and to the sampling time, at the beginning of lactation with cows in negative energy balance and depressed immunity. The fact that the cows were born and reared outside, on pasture with continuous nematode larvae exposure, may also account for the results obtained. In conclusion, EPG counting during the first postpartum month may be a useful tool for the diagnosis of production impairment induced by high nematode burden in adult grazing dairy cows. The anthelmintic treatment of only the EPG-positive recently calved cows would improve milk production, while reducing selective pressure on nematode population for the development of resistance.
抗寄生虫药物耐药性的发展促使人们寻找诊断方法,以识别需要进行靶向选择性治疗的动物。我们比较了三种方法,用于诊断在潮湿潘帕斯(阿根廷)一个 150 头奶牛的完全放牧奶牛场中的线虫感染与产奶量的关系。在产后第一个月,分别采集动物粪便、血液和牛奶,用于 EPG、胃蛋白酶原和抗奥斯特拉谷虫抗体测定。根据获得的结果,为每种方法分别确定了两组奶牛,分为高寄生虫负担和低寄生虫负担,然后比较组间的产奶量。当根据 EPG 方法(EPG=0(N=106)与 EPG>0(N=44))对奶牛进行分组时,发现每头奶牛每个泌乳期的牛奶产量相差近 800 升(P<0.05)。另一方面,通过胃蛋白酶原(mUtyr ≤ 1000 与 mUtyr > 1000)或抗奥斯特拉谷虫(ODR ≤ 0.5 与 ODR > 0.5)方法分组的两组之间的产奶量没有差异。有趣的是,不同方法分组的奶牛比例不同(P<0.0001),与使用 EPG 或胃蛋白酶原方法相比,抗奥斯特拉谷虫方法使更多的奶牛处于高指数组。不同方法确定的寄生虫指标之间没有相关性。可能是由于全年完全放牧的生产系统和泌乳初期的采样时间导致了高寄生虫负担的估计,此时奶牛处于负能量平衡和免疫力下降的状态。此外,牛出生和在外面的牧场饲养,持续接触线虫幼虫,也可能导致了这些结果。总之,在产后第一个月进行 EPG 计数可能是诊断成年放牧奶牛高线虫负担引起的生产障碍的有用工具。对最近产犊的 EPG 阳性奶牛进行驱虫治疗可以提高产奶量,同时减少对线虫种群产生耐药性的选择压力。