de Cruppé W, Geraedts M
Institut für Gesundheitssystemforschung, Private Universität Witten/Herdecke gGmbH, Alfred-Herrhausen-Strasse 50, Witten, Germany.
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2011 Aug;54(8):951-7. doi: 10.1007/s00103-011-1320-3.
Patients want to decide on health care providers. Published quality reports are supposed to help but are rarely used. How patients manage choosing a hospital for elective surgery in Germany and whether they use the hospital quality reports was explored for the Federal Joint Committee.
A cross-sectional survey asked 48 hospitalized patients from 5 specialties in 4 hospitals after elective surgery about their criteria and sources of information, and their use of the compulsory quality reports for choosing the hospital. Data were analyzed descriptively.
To choose their hospital is very important for patients with elective surgery and they do so. Usually there is enough time to obtain information before admission. The three main criteria are own experience with a hospital, short distance from their homes, and the hospital's expertise. The main sources of information are relatives, contact with the hospital's outpatient departments, and patient's ambulatory health care provider. Written information is only used as supplementary information. The compulsory quality reports are not known and, hence, are not used.
患者希望自己决定医疗服务提供者。已发布的质量报告本应有所帮助,但很少被使用。为联邦联合委员会进行了一项研究,探讨德国患者如何选择择期手术的医院,以及他们是否使用医院质量报告。
一项横断面调查询问了4家医院5个专科的48名择期手术后住院患者,了解他们选择医院的标准、信息来源以及使用强制性质量报告的情况。对数据进行描述性分析。
对于择期手术患者来说,选择医院非常重要,他们也会这样做。通常在入院前有足够的时间获取信息。三个主要标准是对医院的自身体验、离家距离近以及医院的专业水平。主要信息来源是亲属、与医院门诊部的接触以及患者的门诊医疗服务提供者。书面信息仅作为补充信息使用。强制性质量报告并不为人所知,因此未被使用。