Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 300 Gumi-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, South Korea.
J Arthroplasty. 2012 Mar;27(3):378-85. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.06.007. Epub 2011 Jul 28.
We compared the dislocation rate of total hip arthroplasty between posterior approach and lateral approach in a prospective randomized trial. One hundred ninety-six hips were randomly chosen for a posterior approach with a posterior soft tissue repair (99 hips) or a lateral approach (97 hips). The average duration of follow-up was 37.9 months. Three hips (3%) dislocated in the lateral group, whereas none from the posterior group dislocated. At the final follow-up, the Harris hip score and limping were similar in the 2 groups. The joint stability obtained by the posterior soft tissue repair in the posterior approach group seemed to produce more favorable result when compared to the stability obtained from the lateral approach group.
我们在一项前瞻性随机试验中比较了后路和外侧入路全髋关节置换术的脱位率。196 髋随机选择后路,后路软组织修复(99 髋)或外侧入路(97 髋)。平均随访时间为 37.9 个月。外侧组有 3 髋(3%)脱位,而后路组无脱位。末次随访时,两组 Harris 髋关节评分和跛行相似。后路软组织修复获得的关节稳定性似乎比外侧入路组获得的稳定性更有利。