University of Washington, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, Seattle, WA, USA.
Sci Total Environ. 2011 Sep 15;409(20):4247-56. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.06.005. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
Hand-to-mouth activity, especially in children, is a potentially significant pathway of exposure to soil contaminants. Hand-mouthing behavior is of particular concern in areas impacted by mining, smelting, and quarrying activities as these activities may lead to elevated levels of heavy metals in soil. In order to estimate potential exposures to contaminated geologic media attributable to hand-to-mouth contact, it is useful to characterize adherence of those media to skin, as contaminant concentrations in adhered media may differ greatly from unfractionated, whole media concentrations. Such an investigation has been undertaken to aid estimation of exposures to arsenic, cadmium, lead, and zinc in nine different geologic media collected in the Pacific Northwest region of the United States. After establishing the particle size distribution of each medium (fractions <63 μm, 63-150 μm, 150-250 μm, and 250 μm-2mm were determined) and target elemental concentrations within each particle size fraction, an active handling protocol involving six volunteers was conducted. Wet media always adhered to a greater extent than dry media and adhered media generally had higher elemental concentrations than bulk media. Regression analyses suggest smaller particle fractions may have higher elemental concentrations. Results of application of a maximum likelihood estimation technique generally indicate that handling of dry media leads to preferential adherence of smaller particle sizes, while handling of wet media does not. Because adhered material can differ greatly in particle size distribution from that found in bulk material, use of bulk concentrations in exposure calculations may lead to poor estimation of actual exposures. Since lead has historically been a metal of particular concern, EPA's Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic (IEUBK) Model was used to examine the potential consequences of evaluating ingestion of the selected media assuming concentrations in adhering versus bulk media.
手口接触活动,尤其是在儿童中,是接触土壤污染物的一个重要途径。在采矿、冶炼和采石等活动影响的地区,手口接触行为尤其令人关注,因为这些活动可能导致土壤中重金属含量升高。为了估计因手口接触而接触受污染地质介质的潜在暴露量,对这些介质与皮肤的附着性进行特征描述是有用的,因为附着介质中的污染物浓度与未分级的全介质浓度可能有很大差异。为了帮助估计美国太平洋西北地区采集的 9 种不同地质介质中砷、镉、铅和锌的暴露量,进行了这样的调查。在确定每种介质的粒度分布(<63 μm、63-150 μm、150-250 μm 和 250 μm-2mm 的分数)和每个粒度分数内的目标元素浓度后,进行了一项涉及 6 名志愿者的主动处理方案。湿介质的附着程度总是高于干介质,附着介质的元素浓度通常高于散装介质。回归分析表明,较小的颗粒分数可能具有较高的元素浓度。最大似然估计技术的应用结果表明,干燥介质的处理导致较小颗粒尺寸的优先附着,而湿介质的处理则不会。由于附着材料的粒度分布与散装材料有很大差异,因此在暴露计算中使用散装浓度可能会导致对实际暴露量的估计不佳。由于铅历来是一种特别受关注的金属,因此使用了 EPA 的综合暴露摄入生物动力学(IEUBK)模型来检查在假设附着介质与散装介质中的浓度的情况下评估选定介质的摄入的潜在后果。