• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

识别不列颠哥伦比亚省长期护理设施在感染预防和控制资源方面的差距。

Identifying the gaps in infection prevention and control resources for long-term care facilities in British Columbia.

机构信息

Provincial Infection Control Network of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Infect Control. 2012 Mar;40(2):150-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.03.026. Epub 2011 Jul 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajic.2011.03.026
PMID:21802783
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Infection prevention and control (IPC) is a critical, although often neglected, part of long-term care (LTC) management. Little is known about what IPC resources are available for LTC and how that impacts patient care and safety.

METHODS

One hundred eighty-eight LTC facilities were randomly selected out of all British Columbia facilities and surveyed using a validated survey tool. The tool was used to collect data regarding IPC resources grouped within 6 indices: (1) leadership, (2) infection control professionals (ICP) coverage, (3) policies and procedures, (4) support through partnerships, (5) surveillance, and (6) control activities. All components measured have been identified as key for an effective IPC program. Survey responses were used to calculate scores for IPC programs as a whole and for each of the 6 indices.

RESULTS

Of 188 randomly selected facilities, 86 institutions participated. Facilities were compared by region, funding source, and ICP coverage. Overall, LTC facilities lacked IPC leadership, especially physician support. Having no dedicated ICP was associated with poorer scores on all indices. Only 41% of practicing ICPs had more than 2 years experience, and only 14% were professionally certified. Twenty-two percent of ICPs had additional roles within the institution, and 44% had additional roles outside of the institution. Thirty-five percent of institutions had no IPC dedicated budget.

DISCUSSION

LTC institutions-with bed numbers exceeding those in acute care-represent an important aspect of health services. These data show that many LTC facilities lack the necessary resources to provide quality infection control programs.

摘要

背景

感染预防与控制(IPC)是长期护理(LTC)管理中一个至关重要但往往被忽视的环节。目前,我们对于 LTC 现有的 IPC 资源以及这些资源对患者护理和安全的影响知之甚少。

方法

从不列颠哥伦比亚省的所有设施中随机抽取 188 家 LTC 机构,并使用经过验证的调查工具对其进行调查。该工具用于收集与 IPC 资源相关的数据,这些资源分为 6 个指标进行分组:(1)领导力;(2)感染控制专业人员(ICP)的覆盖范围;(3)政策和程序;(4)通过伙伴关系提供的支持;(5)监测;(6)控制活动。所有衡量的指标都被认为是有效 IPC 计划的关键。调查回复用于计算 IPC 计划的整体得分和 6 个指标中的每个指标的得分。

结果

在随机抽取的 188 家设施中,有 86 家机构参与了调查。按地区、资金来源和 ICP 覆盖范围对设施进行了比较。总体而言,LTC 设施缺乏 IPC 领导力,特别是缺乏医生的支持。没有专门的 ICP 与所有指标的得分较差相关。只有 41%的执业 ICP 拥有超过 2 年的经验,只有 14%的 ICP 具有专业认证。22%的 ICP 在机构内有其他角色,44%的 ICP 在机构外有其他角色。35%的机构没有专门的 IPC 预算。

讨论

床位数超过急性护理的 LTC 机构代表了卫生服务的一个重要方面。这些数据表明,许多 LTC 设施缺乏提供高质量感染控制计划所需的资源。

相似文献

1
Identifying the gaps in infection prevention and control resources for long-term care facilities in British Columbia.识别不列颠哥伦比亚省长期护理设施在感染预防和控制资源方面的差距。
Am J Infect Control. 2012 Mar;40(2):150-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.03.026. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
2
Infection control resources in New York State hospitals, 2007.2007年纽约州医院的感染控制资源
Am J Infect Control. 2008 Dec;36(10):702-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.01.011. Epub 2008 Oct 3.
3
Finding the gaps: an assessment of infection control surveillance needs in British Columbia acute care facilities.
Am J Infect Control. 2008 Dec;36(10):706-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.06.004. Epub 2008 Oct 22.
4
How Maryland increased infection prevention and control activity in long-term care facilities, 2003-2008.2003-2008 年马里兰州如何加强长期护理机构的感染预防与控制活动。
Am J Infect Control. 2011 May;39(4):292-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2010.09.004. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
5
A survey of infection prevention and control resources in acute care facilities across British Columbia.不列颠哥伦比亚省急性护理机构感染预防与控制资源调查。
Can J Infect Control. 2009 Winter;24(4):213-8.
6
Long-term care survey reveals challenges. Facilities grapple with five broad issues, including changes in leadership and AIDS.长期护理调查揭示了挑战。各机构努力应对五大广泛问题,包括领导层变动和艾滋病问题。
Health Prog. 1993 May;74(4):38-42.
7
A national survey of infection control and antimicrobial stewardship structures in Irish long-term care facilities.爱尔兰长期护理机构感染控制和抗菌药物管理结构的全国性调查。
Am J Infect Control. 2013 Jun;41(6):554-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.06.010. Epub 2012 Nov 11.
8
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
9
Assessing the status of infection control programs in small rural hospitals in the western United States.评估美国西部农村小医院感染控制项目的状况。
Am J Infect Control. 2004 Aug;32(5):255-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2003.10.016.
10
Utilization of nurse practitioners in long-term care: findings and implications of a national survey.长期护理中执业护士的使用情况:一项全国性调查的结果与启示
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2004 Jan-Feb;5(1):9-15.

引用本文的文献

1
Mind the gap: knowledge, attitudes and perceptions on antimicrobial resistance, antimicrobial stewardship and infection prevention and control in long-term care facilities for people with disabilities in the Netherlands.注意差距:荷兰残疾人士长期护理机构对抗微生物药物耐药性、抗微生物药物管理以及感染预防和控制的知识、态度和看法。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2024 Jun 5;13(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13756-024-01415-3.
2
Preparedness and response of assisted living facilities toward COVID-19 infection control in Houston, Texas, USA.美国得克萨斯州休斯敦市辅助生活设施针对新型冠状病毒肺炎感染控制的防范与应对措施
J Infect Prev. 2023 Sep;24(5):199-205. doi: 10.1177/17571774231159390. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
3
Remote infection control assessments in long-term care facilities during COVID-19 pandemic in Texas, 2020.
2020 年德克萨斯州 COVID-19 大流行期间长期护理机构的远程感染控制评估。
Am J Infect Control. 2022 Oct;50(10):1110-1117. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2022.07.007.