• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

空间问题解决中的文化共性和差异:计算分析。

Cultural commonalities and differences in spatial problem-solving: a computational analysis.

机构信息

EECS Department, Northwestern University, 2133 Sheridan Rd., Evanston, IL 60208, USA.

出版信息

Cognition. 2011 Nov;121(2):281-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.06.012. Epub 2011 Jul 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.06.012
PMID:21803347
Abstract

A fundamental question in human cognition is how people reason about space. We use a computational model to explore cross-cultural commonalities and differences in spatial cognition. Our model is based upon two hypotheses: (1) the structure-mapping model of analogy can explain the visual comparisons used in spatial reasoning; and (2) qualitative, structural representations are computed by people's visual systems and used in these comparisons. We apply our model to a visual oddity task, in which individuals are shown an array of two-dimensional images and asked to the pick the one that does not belong. This task was previously used to evaluate understanding of geometric concepts in two disparate populations: North Americans, and the Mundurukú, a South American indigenous group. Our model automatically generates representations of each hand-segmented image and compares them to solve the task. The model achieves human-level performance on this task, and problems that are hard for the model are also difficult for people in both cultures. Furthermore, ablation studies on the model suggest explanations for cross-cultural differences in terms of differences in spatial representations.

摘要

人类认知中的一个基本问题是人们如何推理空间。我们使用计算模型来探索空间认知中的跨文化共性和差异。我们的模型基于两个假设:(1)类比的结构映射模型可以解释用于空间推理的视觉比较;(2)定性的、结构性的表示是由人们的视觉系统计算出来的,并用于这些比较。我们将我们的模型应用于一个视觉异常任务,在该任务中,个体被展示一组二维图像,并被要求挑选一个不属于该组的图像。这个任务以前曾被用于评估两个截然不同的人群对几何概念的理解:北美人,以及南美的 Mundurukú 土著群体。我们的模型自动生成每个手工分割图像的表示,并进行比较以解决任务。该模型在这项任务上达到了人类水平的表现,而且对于模型来说困难的问题对于两种文化的人来说也是困难的。此外,对模型的消融研究根据空间表示的差异提出了跨文化差异的解释。

相似文献

1
Cultural commonalities and differences in spatial problem-solving: a computational analysis.空间问题解决中的文化共性和差异:计算分析。
Cognition. 2011 Nov;121(2):281-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.06.012. Epub 2011 Jul 30.
2
Sex differences in spatial cognition, computational fluency, and arithmetical reasoning.空间认知、计算流畅性和算术推理中的性别差异。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2000 Dec;77(4):337-53. doi: 10.1006/jecp.2000.2594.
3
A hierarchy for relational reasoning in the prefrontal cortex.前额皮质中关系推理的层次结构。
Cortex. 2011 May;47(5):588-97. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2010.04.008. Epub 2010 May 27.
4
Relational spatial reasoning by a nonhuman: the example of capuchin monkeys.非人类的关系性空间推理:卷尾猴的例子。
Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev. 2005 Dec;4(4):282-306. doi: 10.1177/1534582306286573.
5
The nature of gestures' beneficial role in spatial problem solving.手势在空间问题解决中有益作用的本质。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2011 Feb;140(1):102-16. doi: 10.1037/a0021790.
6
Young children's analogical reasoning across cultures: similarities and differences.跨文化视角下的幼儿类比推理:异同。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2010 Jan-Feb;105(1-2):146-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.08.003. Epub 2009 Nov 6.
7
Cognitive and task-related EEG correlates of arithmetic performance in adolescents.青少年算术表现的认知及任务相关脑电图关联
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1987 Oct;9(5):563-74. doi: 10.1080/01688638708410769.
8
Visual spatial representation in mathematical problem solving by deaf and hearing students.聋生和听力正常学生在数学问题解决中的视觉空间表征
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2007 Fall;12(4):432-48. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enm022. Epub 2007 Jun 4.
9
Embodied spatial cognition.具身空间认知
Top Cogn Sci. 2011 Oct;3(4):686-706. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2011.01158.x.
10
Plasticity of human spatial cognition: spatial language and cognition covary across cultures.人类空间认知的可塑性:空间语言和认知在不同文化中相互关联。
Cognition. 2011 Apr;119(1):70-80. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.12.009. Epub 2011 Jan 15.

引用本文的文献

1
On the visual analytic intelligence of neural networks.神经网络的可视化分析智能。
Nat Commun. 2023 Sep 25;14(1):5978. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-41566-2.
2
"Oh no, the forest is burning!" cultural differences in the complex problem-solving process only under high uncertainty.“哦,不,森林着火了!”复杂问题解决过程中的文化差异仅存在于高度不确定性的情况下。
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 22;13:965623. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.965623. eCollection 2022.
3
Topological Relations Between Objects Are Categorically Coded.对象之间的拓扑关系是分类编码的。
Psychol Sci. 2017 Oct;28(10):1408-1418. doi: 10.1177/0956797617709814. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
4
Cultural background shapes spatial reference frame proclivity.文化背景塑造空间参照框架倾向。
Sci Rep. 2015 Jun 15;5:11426. doi: 10.1038/srep11426.