• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜辅助与开放修复矢状缝早闭:圣路易斯儿童医院的经验

Endoscopically assisted versus open repair of sagittal craniosynostosis: the St. Louis Children's Hospital experience.

作者信息

Shah Manish N, Kane Alex A, Petersen J Dayne, Woo Albert S, Naidoo Sybill D, Smyth Matthew D

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2011 Aug;8(2):165-70. doi: 10.3171/2011.5.PEDS1128.

DOI:10.3171/2011.5.PEDS1128
PMID:21806358
Abstract

OBJECT

This study investigated the differences in effectiveness and morbidity between endoscopically assisted wide-vertex strip craniectomy with barrel-stave osteotomies and postoperative helmet therapy versus open calvarial vault reconstruction without helmet therapy for sagittal craniosynostosis.

METHODS

Between 2003 and 2010, the authors prospectively observed 89 children less than 12 months old who were surgically treated for a diagnosis of isolated sagittal synostosis. The endoscopic procedure was offered starting in 2006. The data associated with length of stay, blood loss, transfusion rates, operating times, and cephalic indices were reviewed.

RESULTS

There were 47 endoscopically treated patients with a mean age at surgery of 3.6 months and 42 patients with open-vault reconstruction whose mean age at surgery was 6.8 months. The mean follow-up time was 13 months for endoscopic versus 25 months for open procedures. The mean operating time for the endoscopic procedure was 88 minutes, versus 179 minutes for the open surgery. The mean blood loss was 29 ml for endoscopic versus 218 ml for open procedures. Three endoscopically treated cases (6.4%) underwent transfusion, whereas all patients with open procedures underwent transfusion, with a mean of 1.6 transfusions per patient. The mean length of stay was 1.2 days for endoscopic and 3.9 days for open procedures. Of endoscopically treated patients completing helmet therapy, the mean duration for helmet therapy was 8.7 months. The mean pre- and postoperative cephalic indices for endoscopic procedures were 68% and 76% at 13 months postoperatively, versus 68% and 77% at 25 months postoperatively for open surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopically assisted strip craniectomy offers a safe and effective treatment for sagittal craniosynostosis that is comparable in outcome to calvarial vault reconstruction, with no increase in morbidity and a shorter length of stay.

摘要

目的

本研究探讨内镜辅助下采用桶状板截骨术的宽顶点条带颅骨切除术及术后头盔治疗与无头盔治疗的开放性颅骨穹窿重建术在矢状缝早闭治疗效果及发病率方面的差异。

方法

2003年至2010年期间,作者前瞻性观察了89例12个月以下因孤立性矢状缝早闭接受手术治疗的儿童。2006年起开始提供内镜手术。回顾了与住院时间、失血量、输血率、手术时间和头指数相关的数据。

结果

47例接受内镜治疗的患者手术时平均年龄为3.6个月,42例接受开放性颅骨穹窿重建术的患者手术时平均年龄为6.8个月。内镜治疗组平均随访时间为13个月,开放性手术组为25个月。内镜手术平均手术时间为88分钟,开放性手术为179分钟。内镜手术平均失血量为29毫升,开放性手术为218毫升。3例接受内镜治疗的病例(6.4%)接受了输血,而所有接受开放性手术的患者均接受了输血,平均每位患者输血1.6次。内镜手术平均住院时间为1.2天,开放性手术为3.9天。完成头盔治疗的内镜治疗患者中,头盔治疗的平均持续时间为8.7个月。内镜手术术后13个月的术前和术后平均头指数分别为68%和76%,开放性手术术后25个月为68%和77%。

结论

内镜辅助条带颅骨切除术为矢状缝早闭提供了一种安全有效的治疗方法,其治疗效果与颅骨穹窿重建术相当,发病率无增加,住院时间更短。

相似文献

1
Endoscopically assisted versus open repair of sagittal craniosynostosis: the St. Louis Children's Hospital experience.内镜辅助与开放修复矢状缝早闭:圣路易斯儿童医院的经验
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2011 Aug;8(2):165-70. doi: 10.3171/2011.5.PEDS1128.
2
Endoscopy-assisted wide-vertex craniectomy, "barrel-stave" osteotomies, and postoperative helmet molding therapy in the early management of sagittal suture craniosynostosis.内镜辅助下宽顶点颅骨切除术、“桶板”截骨术及术后头盔塑形疗法在矢状缝早闭早期治疗中的应用
Neurosurg Focus. 2000 Sep 15;9(3):e2. doi: 10.3171/foc.2000.9.3.3.
3
Endoscopy-assisted wide-vertex craniectomy, barrel stave osteotomies, and postoperative helmet molding therapy in the management of sagittal suture craniosynostosis.内镜辅助下宽顶点颅骨切除术、桶状板截骨术及术后头盔塑形疗法在矢状缝早闭治疗中的应用
J Neurosurg. 2004 May;100(5 Suppl Pediatrics):407-17. doi: 10.3171/ped.2004.100.5.0407.
4
Outcomes of endoscopic suturectomy with postoperative helmet therapy in bilateral coronal craniosynostosis.双侧冠状缝早闭内镜下缝线切除术联合术后头盔治疗的效果
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016 Sep;18(3):281-6. doi: 10.3171/2016.2.PEDS15693. Epub 2016 May 20.
5
Endoscope-assisted management of sagittal synostosis: wide vertex suturectomy and barrel stave osteotomies versus narrow vertex suturectomy.内镜辅助下矢状缝早闭的治疗:宽顶缝切除术和桶状骨切开术与窄顶缝切除术的比较
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016 Dec;25(6):674-678. doi: 10.3171/2016.6.PEDS1623. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
6
Morphological, functional and neurological outcomes of craniectomy versus cranial vault remodeling for isolated nonsyndromic synostosis of the sagittal suture: a systematic review.颅骨切除术与颅骨重塑术治疗孤立性非综合征性矢状缝早闭的形态学、功能及神经学预后:一项系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Sep;13(9):309-68. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2470.
7
Assessing long-term outcomes of open and endoscopic sagittal synostosis reconstruction using three-dimensional photography.使用三维摄影评估开放性和内镜下矢状缝早闭重建的长期效果。
J Craniofac Surg. 2014 Mar;25(2):573-6. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000613.
8
Minimally invasive strip craniectomy for sagittal synostosis.矢状缝早闭的微创条状颅骨切除术
J Craniofac Surg. 2012 May;23(3):825-8. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31824dbcd5.
9
Flexible endoscope-assisted suture release and barrel stave osteotomy for the correction of sagittal synostosis.软性内镜辅助缝线松解及桶状板截骨术治疗矢状缝早闭
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2022 Oct 14;31(1):71-77. doi: 10.3171/2022.9.PEDS22227. Print 2023 Jan 1.
10
Less is more: does the addition of barrel staves improve results in endoscopic strip craniectomy for sagittal craniosynostosis?少即是多:添加桶状骨片能否改善矢状缝早闭的内镜下条带颅骨切除术的效果?
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2017 Jul;20(1):86-90. doi: 10.3171/2017.1.PEDS16478. Epub 2017 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Developments in diagnostic and surgical techniques in children with sagittal suture craniosynostosis: a systematic review spanning the last 30 years.矢状缝早闭患儿诊断和手术技术的进展:过去30年的系统评价
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2025 Aug 17;20(1):437. doi: 10.1186/s13023-025-03978-9.
2
Shaping futures: how surgical timing influences outcomes in endoscopic sagittal craniosynostosis repair.塑造未来:手术时机如何影响内镜矢状缝早闭修复的结果。
Childs Nerv Syst. 2025 May 15;41(1):180. doi: 10.1007/s00381-025-06834-0.
3
Head Shape After Sagittal Craniosynostosis Surgery: Open Versus Endoscopic Strip Craniectomy.
矢状缝早闭手术后的头型:开放式与内镜下条带颅骨切除术对比
Plast Surg (Oakv). 2025 May;33(2):283-288. doi: 10.1177/22925503231184262. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
4
Endoscopic versus open treatment for sagittal craniosynostosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜治疗与开放手术治疗矢状缝早闭:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Feb 22;48(1):262. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03423-2.
5
Open versus endoscopic surgery with helmet molding therapy in non-syndromic patients with craniosynostosis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes and treatment-related costs.非综合征性颅缝早闭患者采用开放式手术与内镜手术联合头盔塑形治疗:临床结局及治疗相关成本的最新系统评价与荟萃分析
Childs Nerv Syst. 2024 Dec 16;41(1):53. doi: 10.1007/s00381-024-06692-2.
6
The Effect of Barrel-Stave Osteotomy Length in Sagittal Strip Craniectomy.矢状条颅骨切除术桶状板截骨长度的影响
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2025 Oct;62(10):1750-1756. doi: 10.1177/10556656241275964. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
7
Endoscopic surgery for craniosynostosis: a bibliometric analysis of primary studies.内镜颅缝早闭手术:原始研究的文献计量分析。
Childs Nerv Syst. 2024 Nov;40(11):3647-3654. doi: 10.1007/s00381-024-06552-z. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
8
Isolated Sagittal Craniosynostosis: A Comprehensive Review.孤立性矢状缝早闭:综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Feb 16;14(4):435. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14040435.
9
Concurrent impact of de novo mutations on cranial and cortical development in nonsyndromic craniosynostosis.非综合征性颅缝早闭中新生突变对颅面和皮质发育的并发影响。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2023 Oct 27;33(1):59-72. doi: 10.3171/2023.8.PEDS23155. Print 2024 Jan 1.
10
Biparietal remodelling and total vault remodelling in scaphocephaly-a comparative study using 3d stereophotogrammetry.舟状头畸形的双顶侧和全颅顶重塑:使用三维体视摄影术的比较研究。
Childs Nerv Syst. 2024 Feb;40(2):517-526. doi: 10.1007/s00381-023-06115-8. Epub 2023 Aug 22.