Suppr超能文献

非杓型血压者的中心血流动力学和心血管风险。

Central hemodynamics and cardiovascular risk in nondippers.

机构信息

Menzies Research Institute, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.

出版信息

J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011 Aug;13(8):557-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2011.00480.x. Epub 2011 Jun 27.

Abstract

Failure of blood pressure (BP) to decline appropriately overnight (nondipping) is associated with increased risk. This may be due to inappropriately raised supine central BP and this study's first aim was to examine this hypothesis. Secondly, aortic stiffness, central hemodynamics, and left ventricular (LV) mass were measured as other possible mechanisms of higher risk. Brachial and central BP (supine and seated), aortic stiffness, central hemodynamics, and LV dimensions were measured in 95 patients with hypertension (mean age 62 ± 8 standard deviation). Central hemodynamics were recorded by combined radial tonometry and 3-dimensional echocardiography. Seated brachial and central systolic BP (SBP) were similar between dippers (n = 52) and nondippers (n = 43). However, nondippers had higher supine brachial (132 ± 14 mm Hg vs 126 ± 11 mm Hg; P = .029) and central (121 ± 15 mm Hg vs 115 ± 11 mm Hg; P = .024) SBP. Aortic stiffness was not different between groups (P = .76), but LV mass index (33.0 ± 6.2 vs 29.4±7.2 g/m(2.7) ; P=.019), stroke volume index (30.2 ± 6.2 mL/m(2) vs 27.4 ± 6.0 mL/m(2) ; P = .040), and LV stroke work (3246 ± 815 mm Hg/mL/m(2) vs 2778 ± 615 mm Hg/mL/m(2) ; P = .005) were all higher in nondippers. Dipper status independently predicted LV mass index (β = 3.61; P = .001). Nondippers have higher supine brachial and central SBP, significantly different central hemodynamics, and elevated LV mass index compared with dippers. These cardiovascular anomalies possibly contribute to increased mortality risk.

摘要

夜间血压(BP)下降不适当(非杓型)与风险增加有关。这可能是由于仰卧位中心 BP 升高不当,本研究的首要目的是检验这一假说。其次,还测量了主动脉僵硬度、中心血液动力学和左心室(LV)质量,作为更高风险的其他可能机制。在 95 名高血压患者(平均年龄 62±8 标准差)中测量了臂部和中心 BP(仰卧位和坐位)、主动脉僵硬度、中心血液动力学和 LV 尺寸。通过联合桡动脉张力测定和 3 维超声心动图记录中心血液动力学。杓型(n=52)和非杓型(n=43)患者的坐位臂部和中心收缩压(SBP)相似。然而,非杓型患者的仰卧位臂部(132±14mmHg 与 126±11mmHg;P=.029)和中心(121±15mmHg 与 115±11mmHg;P=.024)SBP 更高。两组之间的主动脉僵硬度没有差异(P=.76),但 LV 质量指数(33.0±6.2 与 29.4±7.2g/m2.7;P=.019)、每搏量指数(30.2±6.2mL/m2 与 27.4±6.0mL/m2;P=.040)和 LV 每搏功(3246±815mmHg/mL/m2 与 2778±615mmHg/mL/m2;P=.005)在非杓型患者中均更高。杓型状态独立预测 LV 质量指数(β=3.61;P=.001)。与杓型患者相比,非杓型患者的仰卧位臂部和中心 SBP 更高,中心血液动力学明显不同,LV 质量指数升高。这些心血管异常可能导致死亡率风险增加。

相似文献

1
Central hemodynamics and cardiovascular risk in nondippers.非杓型血压者的中心血流动力学和心血管风险。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011 Aug;13(8):557-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2011.00480.x. Epub 2011 Jun 27.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验