• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Combination angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB)/calcium channel blocker with HCTZ vs the maximal recommended dose of an ARB with HCTZ in patients with stage 2 hypertension: the exforge as compared to losartan treatment in stage 2 systolic hypertension (EXALT) study.血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)/钙通道阻滞剂与 HCTZ 的联合用药与 HCTZ 最大推荐剂量的 ARB 相比在 2 期高血压患者中的应用:依福地平与缬沙坦治疗 2 期收缩期高血压(EXALT)研究。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011 Aug;13(8):588-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2011.00492.x. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
2
Ambulatory blood pressure response to triple therapy with an angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB), calcium-channel blocker (CCB), and HCTZ versus dual therapy with an ARB and HCTZ.与血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)和氢氯噻嗪(HCTZ)的双联疗法相比,血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)、钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)和氢氯噻嗪(HCTZ)三联疗法对动态血压的影响。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2011;7:701-8. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S25743. Epub 2011 Nov 24.
3
Tolerability and blood pressure-lowering efficacy of the combination of amlodipine plus valsartan compared with lisinopril plus hydrochlorothiazide in adult patients with stage 2 hypertension.氨氯地平联合缬沙坦与赖诺普利联合氢氯噻嗪治疗成年2级高血压患者的耐受性及降压疗效比较
Clin Ther. 2007 Feb;29(2):279-89. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.02.003.
4
Efficacy and tolerability of combination therapy with valsartan plus hydrochlorothiazide compared with amlodipine monotherapy in hypertensive patients with other cardiovascular risk factors: the VAST study.缬沙坦联合氢氯噻嗪与氨氯地平单药治疗对伴有其他心血管危险因素的高血压患者的疗效及耐受性比较:VAST研究
Clin Ther. 2005 May;27(5):578-87. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.05.006.
5
Randomized study to compare valsartan +/- HCTZ versus amlodipine +/- HCTZ strategies to maximize blood pressure control.比较缬沙坦±氢氯噻嗪与氨氯地平±氢氯噻嗪策略以最大程度控制血压的随机研究。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2009;5:883-92. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.s8062. Epub 2009 Nov 2.
6
Triple combination therapy with amlodipine, valsartan, and hydrochlorothiazide vs dual combination therapy with amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide for stage 2 hypertensive patients.氨氯地平、缬沙坦和氢氯噻嗪三联联合疗法与氨氯地平和氢氯噻嗪双联联合疗法治疗2级高血压患者的疗效比较
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2010 Sep 7;6:821-7. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.s11522.
7
Amlodipine/valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide: fixed-dose combination in hypertension.氨氯地平/缬沙坦/氢氯噻嗪:高血压的固定剂量复方制剂。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2009;9(6):411-8. doi: 10.2165/11204350-000000000-00000.
8
Two multicenter, 8-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of amlodipine and valsartan in combination and as monotherapy in adult patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.两项多中心、为期8周、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组研究,评估氨氯地平和缬沙坦联合用药及单药治疗对轻度至中度原发性高血压成年患者的疗效和耐受性。
Clin Ther. 2007 Apr;29(4):563-80. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.03.018.
9
Comparison of medium-dose losartan/hydrochlorothiazide and maximal-dose angiotensin II receptor blockers in the treatment of Japanese patients with uncontrolled hypertension: the Kobe-CONNECT Study.比较中剂量氯沙坦/氢氯噻嗪和最大剂量血管紧张素Ⅱ受体阻滞剂治疗未控制的日本高血压患者的疗效:神户-CONNECT 研究。
Hypertens Res. 2012 Nov;35(11):1080-6. doi: 10.1038/hr.2012.110. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
10
Amlodipine/valsartan single-pill combination: a review of its use in the management of hypertension.氨氯地平/缬沙坦单片复方制剂:在高血压治疗中的应用评价。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2009;9(5):309-30. doi: 10.2165/11201120-000000000-00000.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative efficacy and safety of triple therapy (ramipril, telmisartan, hydrochlorothiazide) vs dual anti hypertensive therapy (ramipril or telmisartan, hydrochlorothiazide) in stage 2 hypertensive patients.三联疗法(雷米普利、替米沙坦、氢氯噻嗪)与双联抗高血压疗法(雷米普利或替米沙坦、氢氯噻嗪)治疗2级高血压患者的疗效及安全性比较
J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Aug;8(8):HC25-8. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/8851.4720. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
2
Exploring issues in difficult-to-treat hypertension.探索难治性高血压的相关问题。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2013 Dec;15(12):859-64. doi: 10.1111/jch.12219. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
3
The efficacy and safety of triple vs dual combination of angiotensin II receptor blocker and calcium channel blocker and diuretic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂和钙通道阻滞剂与利尿剂三联与双联联合治疗的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2013 Mar;15(3):193-200. doi: 10.1111/jch.12040. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
4
Ambulatory blood pressure response to triple therapy with an angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB), calcium-channel blocker (CCB), and HCTZ versus dual therapy with an ARB and HCTZ.与血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)和氢氯噻嗪(HCTZ)的双联疗法相比,血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)、钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)和氢氯噻嗪(HCTZ)三联疗法对动态血压的影响。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2011;7:701-8. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S25743. Epub 2011 Nov 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Triple therapy with olmesartan medoxomil, amlodipine besylate, and hydrochlorothiazide in adult patients with hypertension: The TRINITY multicenter, randomized, double-blind, 12-week, parallel-group study.在高血压成年患者中使用奥美沙坦酯、苯磺酸氨氯地平与氢氯噻嗪三联治疗的多中心、随机、双盲、12 周、平行分组研究(TRINITY)。
Clin Ther. 2010 Jul;32(7):1252-69. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.07.008.
2
Angiotensin receptor blocker/diuretic combination preserves insulin responses in obese hypertensives.血管紧张素受体阻滞剂/利尿剂联合治疗可改善肥胖高血压患者的胰岛素反应。
J Hypertens. 2010 Aug;28(8):1761-9. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32833af380.
3
Results of treatment with telmisartan-amlodipine in hypertensive patients.替米沙坦-氨氯地平治疗高血压患者的结果。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2009 Apr;11(4):207-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2009.00098.x.
4
Triple antihypertensive therapy with amlodipine, valsartan, and hydrochlorothiazide: a randomized clinical trial.氨氯地平、缬沙坦和氢氯噻嗪三联降压治疗:一项随机临床试验。
Hypertension. 2009 Jul;54(1):32-9. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.131300. Epub 2009 May 26.
5
Antihypertensive efficacy of olmesartan medoxomil or valsartan in combination with amlodipine: a review of factorial-design studies.奥美沙坦酯或缬沙坦联合氨氯地平的降压疗效:析因设计研究综述
Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Jan;25(1):177-85. doi: 10.1185/03007990802597456.
6
Metabolic and antihypertensive effects of combined angiotensin receptor blocker and diuretic therapy in prediabetic hypertensive patients with the cardiometabolic syndrome.血管紧张素受体阻滞剂与利尿剂联合治疗对伴有心脏代谢综合征的糖尿病前期高血压患者的代谢及降压作用
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2008 Dec;10(12):894-903. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2008.00054.x.
7
Benazepril plus amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide for hypertension in high-risk patients.贝那普利联合氨氯地平或氢氯噻嗪用于高危患者高血压的治疗
N Engl J Med. 2008 Dec 4;359(23):2417-28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0806182.
8
Telmisartan/Hydrochlorothiazide: a review of its use as fixed-dose combinations in essential hypertension.替米沙坦/氢氯噻嗪:其在原发性高血压中作为固定剂量复方制剂应用的综述
Drugs. 2008;68(13):1877-99. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200868130-00010.
9
Olmesartan medoxomil: a review of its use in the management of hypertension.奥美沙坦酯:关于其在高血压管理中应用的综述
Drugs. 2008;68(9):1239-72. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200868090-00005.
10
Two multicenter, 8-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of amlodipine and valsartan in combination and as monotherapy in adult patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.两项多中心、为期8周、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组研究,评估氨氯地平和缬沙坦联合用药及单药治疗对轻度至中度原发性高血压成年患者的疗效和耐受性。
Clin Ther. 2007 Apr;29(4):563-80. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.03.018.

血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)/钙通道阻滞剂与 HCTZ 的联合用药与 HCTZ 最大推荐剂量的 ARB 相比在 2 期高血压患者中的应用:依福地平与缬沙坦治疗 2 期收缩期高血压(EXALT)研究。

Combination angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB)/calcium channel blocker with HCTZ vs the maximal recommended dose of an ARB with HCTZ in patients with stage 2 hypertension: the exforge as compared to losartan treatment in stage 2 systolic hypertension (EXALT) study.

机构信息

Pacific Heart Institute, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011 Aug;13(8):588-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2011.00492.x. Epub 2011 Jul 14.

DOI:10.1111/j.1751-7176.2011.00492.x
PMID:21806769
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8108754/
Abstract

This study compared the efficacy and safety of combination angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB)/calcium-channel blocker (CCB) with hydrochlorothiazide (valsartan/amlodipine/HCTZ 160/5/2mg) vs maximal available combination doses of an ARB with HCTZ (losartan/HCTZ 100/25 mg) in the management of stage 2 hypertension. After 1 to 2 weeks of antihypertensive drug washout, patients with a mean sitting systolic blood pressure (MSSBP) of ≥ 160 mm Hg and <200 mm Hg were randomized to valsartan/amlodipine 160/5 mg (n = 241) or losartan 100 mg (n = 247). At week 3, HCTZ 25 mg was added to both treatments. The primary end point, reduction in MSSBP from baseline to week 6, was significantly greater in the valsartan/amlodipine group than in the losartan group (least-squares [LS] mean change, -31.8 mm Hg vs -26.4 mm Hg; P<.001). Additional reductions occurred after titrating to 320/10/25 mg at week 6 in the valsartan/amlodipine group and switching from losartan/HCTZ to valsartan/amlodipine/HCTZ (week 6, 160/5/25 mg; week 9, 320/10/25 mg) in the losartan group. Achievement of blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg also favored the valsartan/amlodipine group. Dizziness was the only adverse event reported in >5% of patients (5.4% valsartan/amlodipine group, 3.6% losartan group). Moderate doses of an ARB/CCB combination with HCTZ reduced blood pressure more effectively than the maximal dose of an ARB with HCTZ.

摘要

这项研究比较了血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)/钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)联合氢氯噻嗪(缬沙坦/氨氯地平/HCTZ 160/5/2mg)与 ARB 联合 HCTZ 的最大可用剂量(氯沙坦/HCTZ 100/25mg)在 2 级高血压治疗中的疗效和安全性。在 1 至 2 周的降压药物洗脱期后,平均坐位收缩压(MSSBP)≥160mmHg 且<200mmHg 的患者被随机分为缬沙坦/氨氯地平 160/5mg 组(n=241)或氯沙坦 100mg 组(n=247)。第 3 周时,两组均加用氢氯噻嗪 25mg。缬沙坦/氨氯地平组的主要终点(从基线到第 6 周 MSSBP 的降低)显著大于氯沙坦组(最小二乘[LS]平均变化,-31.8mmHg 与-26.4mmHg;P<.001)。在缬沙坦/氨氯地平组第 6 周时将剂量滴定至 320/10/25mg,以及在氯沙坦组从氯沙坦/HCTZ 转换为缬沙坦/氨氯地平/HCTZ(第 6 周,160/5/25mg;第 9 周,320/10/25mg)后,血压进一步下降。血压<140/90mmHg 的达标率也有利于缬沙坦/氨氯地平组。头晕是唯一报告发生率超过 5%的不良事件(缬沙坦/氨氯地平组 5.4%,氯沙坦组 3.6%)。ARB/CCB 联合 HCTZ 的中等剂量比 ARB 联合 HCTZ 的最大剂量更有效地降低血压。