• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加利福尼亚教学学校花园计划评估。

An evaluation of the California Instructional School Garden Program.

机构信息

Department of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.

出版信息

Public Health Nutr. 2012 Feb;15(2):285-90. doi: 10.1017/S1368980011001248. Epub 2011 Aug 2.

DOI:10.1017/S1368980011001248
PMID:21806859
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

California Assembly Bill 1535 awarded $US 15 million to California public schools to promote, develop and sustain instructional school gardens through the California Instructional School Garden Program (CISGP). The present study was designed to assess the effectiveness of the CISGP at assisting schools in implementing, maintaining and sustaining an academic school garden programme, determine how schools utilized the funding they received and assess the impact of the California state budget crisis on the CISGP.

DESIGN

A mid-term evaluation was used to assess the degree to which schools achieved their instructional garden-related goals.

SETTING

California.

SUBJECTS

Only schools that applied for the CIGSP grant as part of a school district and also provided a contact email and had a unique contact person were included in the study (n 3103, 80·6 %).

RESULTS

In general, many schools reported not achieving their predicted goals with regard to the CISGP grant. Only 39·4 % of schools reported accomplishing all of their garden-related goals. Over one-third (37·8 %) of schools reported that their school gardens were negatively affected by the California budget deficit.

CONCLUSIONS

The difference between predicted and actual utilization of the CISGP grants may be due to a combination of the effects of budget shortfall and insufficiency of the grant award amount.

摘要

目的

加州议会法案 1535 向加州公立学校拨款 1500 万美元,通过加州教学植物园计划(CISGP)促进、发展和维持学校教学植物园。本研究旨在评估 CISGP 在协助学校实施、维持和持续学术植物园项目方面的有效性,确定学校如何利用所获得的资金,并评估加州州预算危机对 CISGP 的影响。

设计

采用中期评估来评估学校在实现与教学植物园相关目标方面的程度。

地点

加利福尼亚州。

对象

仅包括作为学区的一部分申请 CIGSP 赠款的学校,并且提供了电子邮件联系地址,并设有唯一联系人(n=3103,80.6%)。

结果

总体而言,许多学校报告称没有实现 CISGP 赠款的预期目标。只有 39.4%的学校报告完成了所有与花园相关的目标。超过三分之一(37.8%)的学校报告说,他们的学校花园受到加州预算赤字的负面影响。

结论

CISGP 赠款的预期和实际利用之间的差异可能是由于预算短缺和赠款金额不足的综合影响。

相似文献

1
An evaluation of the California Instructional School Garden Program.加利福尼亚教学学校花园计划评估。
Public Health Nutr. 2012 Feb;15(2):285-90. doi: 10.1017/S1368980011001248. Epub 2011 Aug 2.
2
Factors contributing to a school's decision to apply for the California Instructional School Garden Program.促成学校决定申请加利福尼亚州教学学校花园计划的因素。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2012 Jul-Aug;44(4):379-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2011.08.001. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
3
Best practices models for implementing, sustaining, and using instructional school gardens in California.在加利福尼亚州实施、维持和使用教学性学校花园的最佳实践模式。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2011 Sep-Oct;43(5):409-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2011.05.005.
4
Use of school gardens in academic instruction.学校花园在学术教学中的应用。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2005 May-Jun;37(3):147-51. doi: 10.1016/s1499-4046(06)60269-8.
5
Impact of garden-based youth nutrition intervention programs: a review.基于花园的青少年营养干预项目的影响:一项综述。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2009 Feb;109(2):273-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2008.10.051.
6
Development of the GREEN (Garden Resources, Education, and Environment Nexus) Tool: An Evidence-Based Model for School Garden Integration.《GREEN(花园资源、教育和环境关联)工具的开发:学校花园整合的循证模型》
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Oct;117(10):1517-1527.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.02.008. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
7
Garden-based nutrition education affects fruit and vegetable consumption in sixth-grade adolescents.基于花园的营养教育影响六年级青少年的水果和蔬菜摄入量。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2007 Apr;107(4):662-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2007.01.015.
8
School gardens: an experiential learning approach for a nutrition education program to increase fruit and vegetable knowledge, preference, and consumption among second-grade students.学校花园:一种体验式学习方法,用于开展营养教育项目,以增加二年级学生对水果和蔬菜的了解、喜好及摄入量。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2009 May-Jun;41(3):212-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2008.06.002.
9
Expanding children's food experiences: the impact of a school-based kitchen garden program.拓展儿童的食物体验:基于学校的菜园项目的影响。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2013 Mar;45(2):137-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2012.09.004.
10
A garden pilot project enhances fruit and vegetable consumption among children.一个花园试点项目增加了儿童对水果和蔬菜的摄入量。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2009 Jul;109(7):1220-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2009.04.009.

引用本文的文献

1
School Gardens in the United States: Current Barriers to Integration and Sustainability.美国的学校花园:当前整合与可持续发展的障碍。
Am J Public Health. 2018 Nov;108(11):1543-1549. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304674. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
2
Examining the Benefits and Barriers of Instructional Gardening Programs to Increase Fruit and Vegetable Intake among Preschool-Age Children.探究教学园艺项目对增加学龄前儿童水果和蔬菜摄入量的益处与障碍。
J Environ Public Health. 2017;2017:2506864. doi: 10.1155/2017/2506864. Epub 2017 May 21.
3
Influence of school architecture and design on healthy eating: a review of the evidence.
学校建筑与设计对健康饮食的影响:证据综述
Am J Public Health. 2015 Apr;105(4):e46-57. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302453. Epub 2015 Feb 25.