Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
Arthroscopy. 2011 Sep;27(9):1242-51. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.03.086. Epub 2011 Jul 31.
The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical results of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction by use of bone-patellar tendon-bone and gracilis tendon (BPTB-G) grafts and to compare them with the results of double-bundle ACL reconstruction by use of semitendinosus tendon (ST) or semitendinosus-gracilis tendon (ST-G) grafts, with particular emphasis on the postoperative incidence of anterior knee pain.
The study comprised 144 patients who underwent unilateral anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction with 3 graft types, including 55 BPTB-G, 56 ST, and 33 ST-G grafts. A traumatic graft rupture occurred within 2 years postoperatively in 5 patients (1 BPTB-G, 3 ST, and 1 ST-G). Clinical results and incidence and severity of anterior knee pain were assessed and compared among the 3 different graft groups at 2 years postoperatively. Potential variables influencing postoperative anterior knee pain development were subjected to univariate analysis, followed by logistic regression analysis to identify risk factors for anterior knee pain.
Both subjective and objective clinical results in anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction with BPTB-G graft were similar to those using ST or ST-G graft at 2 years postoperatively. The incidences of anterior knee pain at 2 years' follow-up were 18.5%, 9.4%, and 9.3% in the BPTB-G, ST, and ST-G groups, respectively, indicating no statistically significant difference among the 3 groups. Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that BPTB graft harvest and patellofemoral cartilage defect failed to be significant factors for anterior knee pain whereas quadriceps peak torque at 60°/s was the only significant factor for anterior knee pain at 2 years.
Clinical results including the incidence of anterior knee pain 2 years after anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction with BPTB-G grafts were comparable to those after ACL reconstruction with ST or ST-G grafts.
Level III, therapeutic, retrospective comparative study.
本研究旨在评估使用骨-髌腱-骨(BPTB)和股薄肌肌腱(G)移植物进行解剖双束前交叉韧带(ACL)重建的临床结果,并将其与使用半腱肌腱(ST)或半腱肌-股薄肌肌腱(ST-G)移植物进行双束 ACL 重建的结果进行比较,特别强调术后前膝疼痛的发生率。
本研究纳入了 144 例接受单侧解剖双束 ACL 重建的患者,使用了 3 种移植物类型,包括 55 例 BPTB-G、56 例 ST 和 33 例 ST-G 移植物。5 例(1 例 BPTB-G、3 例 ST 和 1 例 ST-G)患者术后 2 年内发生创伤性移植物断裂。术后 2 年对 3 组不同移植物的临床结果和前膝疼痛的发生率及严重程度进行评估和比较。对可能影响术后前膝疼痛发展的潜在变量进行单因素分析,然后进行逻辑回归分析,以确定前膝疼痛的危险因素。
在术后 2 年时,使用 BPTB-G 移植物进行解剖双束 ACL 重建的主观和客观临床结果与使用 ST 或 ST-G 移植物相似。术后 2 年随访时,BPTB-G、ST 和 ST-G 组的前膝疼痛发生率分别为 18.5%、9.4%和 9.3%,3 组间无统计学差异。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,BPTB 移植物采集和髌股软骨缺损不是前膝疼痛的显著因素,而股四头肌峰值扭矩在 60°/s 时是术后 2 年时前膝疼痛的唯一显著因素。
使用 BPTB-G 移植物进行解剖双束 ACL 重建后 2 年的临床结果,包括前膝疼痛的发生率,与使用 ST 或 ST-G 移植物的 ACL 重建结果相当。
III 级,治疗性,回顾性比较研究。