Vlachos L, Trakadas S, Gouliamos A, Lazarou S, Mourikis D, Ioannou R, Kalovidouris A, Papavasiliou C
Department of Radiology, University Areteion Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Gastrointest Radiol. 1990 Spring;15(2):102-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01888749.
Forty-one patients with liver tumor have been evaluated with ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (IA-DSA), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in order to establish the accuracy of each technique. In group A (24 patients), in which all four imaging modalities were performed, our results show that MRI detected all hemangiomas (25/25) compared to 22/25, 21/25, and 20/25 with US, CT, and IA-DSA, respectively. No difference between the various methods was seen in the case of hepatoma. Finally, in the patients with metastases, all four techniques had the same sensitivity (100%) but the specificity of MRI was also 100%, compared to 33% for IA-DSA and 66% for US and CT.
为确定每种技术的准确性,对41例肝肿瘤患者进行了超声(US)、计算机断层扫描(CT)、动脉内数字减影血管造影(IA-DSA)和磁共振成像(MRI)检查。在A组(24例患者)中,四项成像检查均已完成,我们的结果显示,MRI检测到了所有的血管瘤(25/25),而US、CT和IA-DSA分别检测到22/25、21/25和20/25。在肝癌病例中,不同方法之间未观察到差异。最后,在有转移的患者中,所有四项技术的敏感性均为100%,但MRI的特异性也为100%,相比之下,IA-DSA为33%,US和CT为66%。